Anybody still advocating for Third World Labor to replace American Labor?

Bull Durham said:
I have explained to you how replacement-level legal immigration (especially without the worthless lottery system) will not ever lead to anything resembling India several times.
Click to expand...

Yes. You have explained that. What you fail to explain is ... why do we need that with Automation, Robotics, and Artificial Intelligence in our Future?
 
Jack said:
Yes. You have explained that. What you fail to explain is ... why do we need that with Automation, Robotics, and Artificial Intelligence in our Future?
Click to expand...

Because you lack imagination. You would have predicted that the infernal combustion engine would put people out of work.
 
Bull Durham said:
You consider DPRK rightist, because... communism?
Click to expand...

Communism is a society with no government where everyone shares everything. North Korea isn't Communist. North Korea is an authoritarian dictatorship, which makes it right-wing.

At least you're correct that theocracies like KSA and Iran are rightist.

My general point is that, while progressivism is the threat most relevant to my life in America, all other forms of illiberalism are also bad, whether they be left (fascism, socialism, Marxism) or right (anarchy, militarism, aristocracy, monarchy, theocracy).
Click to expand...

How exactly is Progressivism a threat to you? How does gay marriage or unisex bathrooms hurt you at all?

How are Anarchy and Monarchy both right-wing?
 
Legion said:
In what demonstrable ways do leftist societies supposedly "do so much better than right-wing countries like Saudi Arabia"?

North Korea is not a "right-wing" country, BTW.
Click to expand...

Would you rather live in Norway or Iran? Switzerland or Somalia? Austria or Russia? Canada or North Korea?
And yes, North Korea is right-wing because it's a totalitarian ultra-nationalist dictatorship.

Leftist societies have better economies, freedom, health, and education. Though I know you don't like that last one.
You can scream about how terrible "THE LEFT" is all you want, but I know that you'd rather live in a liberal country than a conservative one.
 
StoneByStone said:
Communism is a society with no government where everyone shares everything. North Korea isn't Communist. North Korea is an authoritarian dictatorship, which makes it right-wing.



How exactly is Progressivism a threat to you? How does gay marriage or unisex bathrooms hurt you at all?

How are Anarchy and Monarchy both right-wing?
Click to expand...

Are you saying that Lenin's Russia wasn't communist?

Gay marriage and unisex bathrooms are both premised upon lies. Once accepted, these lies set society and science back decades.

Monarchy and aristocracy are societies based upon rightist social structures. Anarchy is very clearly rightist, as it is a reaction to statism. The liberalism of the founding fathers was fearful of democracy, as they knew it could devolve into anarchy as easily as statism.
 
Bull Durham said:
Are you saying that Lenin's Russia wasn't communist?
Click to expand...

Of course. Lenin's Russia had a government.

Gay marriage and unisex bathrooms are both premised upon lies. Once accepted, these lies set society and science back decades.
Click to expand...

And yet accepting LGBT rights hasn't set science back. The most scientifically advanced countries in the world also happen to be the most LGBT friendly.

Monarchy and aristocracy are societies based upon rightist social structures. Anarchy is very clearly rightist, as it is a reaction to statism. The liberalism of the founding fathers was fearful of democracy, as they knew it could devolve into anarchy as easily as statism.
Click to expand...

Anarchy is the absence of a state. So how is Anarchy in the same camp as Monarchy and Aristocracy?
 
StoneByStone said:
Of course. Lenin's Russia had a government.



And yet accepting LGBT rights hasn't set science back. The most scientifically advanced countries in the world also happen to be the most LGBT friendly.



Anarchy is the absence of a state. So how is Anarchy in the same camp as Monarchy and Aristocracy?
Click to expand...

LGBT rights has led to people believing that gender is fluid and non-binary.

Totalitarianism is not the absence of government, and Marxism was never an anarchical philosophy.

As an ideology, anarchy falls on the right. The reason why monarchy and aristocracy also do, is because they represent the old world order. To an extent, with anarchy being the exception, it is a matter of totalitarianism vs authoritarianism.
 
Bull Durham said:
LGBT rights has led to people believing that gender is fluid and non-binary.
Click to expand...

It is. Despite what memes on Facebook say, gender has never been clear cut. The number of genders change based on how you're defining gender and that number is always over two.

Totalitarianism is not the absence of government, and Marxism was never an anarchical philosophy.
Click to expand...

I didn't say Totalitarianism is the absence of government, I said Anarchy is. And Marxism's ultimate goal was Communism which has no government. Obviously, Marxism failed, but that doesn't redefine Communism. Communism is still an anarchist philosophy.

As an ideology, anarchy falls on the right. The reason why monarchy and aristocracy also do, is because they represent the old world order. To an extent, with anarchy being the exception, it is a matter of totalitarianism vs authoritarianism.
Click to expand...

That doesn't make any sense.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top