Are Conservatives Second Amendment Extremists?

RestoreCommonSense said:
That's a ridiculous argument. There is no need for anyone to own a semi-automatic weapon... If you want to hunt use a lever or bolt action rifle... If you need home defense, most gun shops will tell, you that a shotgun is the way to go?

What do we need rapid-fire weapons for? It's tell you what for.... Killing as many people, as quickly as possible.

Most people need to drive, and there is no need for a semi-automatic weapon... So you're argument falls flat on the face.
Click to expand...

The Second Amendment has nothing to do with hunting. Why should law abiding citizens be denied the right to self protection? The most effective weapon for self protection is a semiautomatic. You literally have no idea what you're talking about.
 
Liberals need to start getting smart, and use class-action to start suing the gun manufactures... Once you get a big payout, you reinvest that money into further lawsuits... and start bankrupting them... one by one. If they like attrition, then tie them up in courts and give them a taste of their own medicine.
 
RestoreCommonSense said:
Do you ever wonder why Canadian Conservatives, British Conservatives, and European conservatives aren't in a Rush to pass American style gun laws in their own countries?
Click to expand...

Not in the least. None of those nations have a Constitution that limits Government overreach and have a second amendment. :rolleyes:

RestoreCommonSense said:
If the second amendment is so great... Why aren't conservatives from other countries begging for the same laws to be adapted in their home country? Why didn't Doug Ford, or Andrew Scheer run on a pro-gun platform. You don't hear them bashing Canadian gun laws, or calling them oppressive.
Click to expand...

See above.

RestoreCommonSense said:
Well maybe their scratching their heads, asking themselves.... Do we really want to see mass shootings every week? No Thanks.... You keep your Gun's, and will carry on.
Click to expand...

No; Canadians, Brits and Europeans have been duped to believe Government makes them safe. They have forgotten the lessons of WWI and WWII. It's kind of like their shitty healthcare where they have to wait in long lines.

The common dumb statement for not having instant access is that "someone must have needed it more." Dumb really.

RestoreCommonSense said:
It's very pathetic indeed.
Click to expand...

Yes, your arguments are; not to mention weak and dishonest as well. ;)
 
countryboy said:
You're no conservative, even by Canuck standards. I seriously doubt you're even Canadian. You talk like a run of the mill leftist loon. Gun manufacturers are no more responsible for school shootings than automobile manufacturers are for drunk driving fatalities.
Click to expand...

I think it is LV426
 
RestoreCommonSense said:
Liberals need to start getting smart, and use class-action to start suing the gun manufactures... Once you get a big payout, you reinvest that money into further lawsuits... and start bankrupting them... one by one. If they like attrition, then tie them up in courts and give them a taste of their own medicine.
Click to expand...

Still getting crickets to my question snowflake; what gun laws would have prevented the mass shootings in the US, France and Norway?
 
domer76 said:
More people has NOTHING to do with death rate, idiot.

But, you are correct on the “more guns”. That’s a causative factor, all right.
Click to expand...

top-20-death-rate-revised-768x927.jpg Guess you are right.
 

Attachments

  • gundeaths2016IHME.jpg
    gundeaths2016IHME.jpg
    21.6 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
RestoreCommonSense said:
Liberals need to start getting smart, and use class-action to start suing the gun manufactures... Once you get a big payout, you reinvest that money into further lawsuits... and start bankrupting them... one by one. If they like attrition, then tie them up in courts and give them a taste of their own medicine.
Click to expand...

Lol, conservative my arse.
 
countryboy said:
Protect lives by taking away the people's ability to protect their lives? Riiight.
Click to expand...

It all depends on the UN... If they want to put up with American BS... I say they're too accommodating... because America foots the bill... My advice... Relocate to the EU

Well, for self defense... you can use non lethal means... and that's all you shall receive.... Yous Truly.
 
RestoreCommonSense said:
Piers Morgan said it best. There're an average of 32 people killed by guns per year in Britian. There're an average of 85 People killed per day in the United States....

That just proves that the less guns there are, the less people who die due to gun deaths.

It's a simple trade-off. For everyone shot by an Isis Teorrist, you have thousands of people shot by ordinary gun deaths.

If you ban the guns, you will save thousands of lives.... unless the idiots want to start a civil war.
Click to expand...

And if the three cities with the highest crime rate are removed from the count, the US falls way down on the list.
 
RestoreCommonSense said:
I think we should ban all semi-automatic weapons and only allow shotguns, and single shot rifles for home protect and hunting. We need to Implement vigorous background checks, and non-responsible gun owners, should have all firearms confiscated. End of story.
Click to expand...

What's with this "WE'??

Canada doesn't set policy or law for the US.
 
RestoreCommonSense said:
It all depends on the UN... If they want to put up with American BS... I say they're too accommodating... because America foots the bill... My advice... Relocate to the EU

Well, for self defense... you can use non lethal means... and that's all you shall receive.... Yous Truly.
Click to expand...

Fuck off and die asshole.
 
RestoreCommonSense said:
I don't have a problem with peoples rights. I have a problem with gun culture. Americans make guns apart of their ego... That's the problem. Canadians also have the right to own a gun...but we treat it like Sex in the bedroom. We don't brag about it... We embrace modesty.

Braging about owning guns if froned upon, and it keeps us safe.
Click to expand...

This republic called the United States of America was constructed upon a "GUN CULTURE".....that culture had a great deal in stopping enemy armies from invading the US..(knowing every citizen has a right to gun ownership), Japan suggested that was a great consideration for not invading the west coast right after they destroyed the US navy's ability to defend the coast from attack…..it was that GUN CULTURE that pulled Europe's tits from the fascist wringer ….2 times, after kicking GB's ass 2 times

More information? It is that GUN CULTURE that protects the CANUCKS because their southern neighbor has the biggest attack dog on the planet ….allowing the Canucks to waste their tax money on socialism and supposed free shit because they don't have to fund but a small standing military compared to the US.

Lets compare. Canada's budget on military? 21 Billion compared to a US budget of 682 Billion. The US spends 32x more on National Security than does Canada.

Yeah....GUN CULTURE. :bigthink:
 
domer76 said:
:lolup:

You’re going to try to compare us to El Salvador, Brazil and other third world countries? Priceless!

:rofl2:

Gun death rates (per 100,000)

US - 12.2
Mexico - 7.6
Finland - 3.2
France - 2.8
Canada - 2.0
Norway - 1.7
Sweden - 1.6
Germany - 1.0
Austalia - 1.0
UK - 0.2
Japan - 0.06
Click to expand...

Hate to tell you dick weed gun deaths are the same no matter where they occur. If someone is killed in Brazil does that make it less painful for the family? Sorry AH but you worry about gun deaths I'm just showing you that we aren't the only country with the problem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top