Are You A Capitalist Scumbag?

coolzone said:
Who cares about Venezuela. It's like caring about Vietnam or Libya. To hell with them all. I am a White person and I only care about White people. The problems they have in those other screwed up countries is part of the reason why. As for a kangaroo court, you couldn't do any worse than the Nuremberg Trials. Those scum could have found Mother Teresa guilty.
Click to expand...

Okay, Nazi. So, do you speak German and hate America?
 
coolzone said:
I tried that before. But didn't come up with anything. At least nothing that didn't involve being cooked by radio waves to a greater degree than I already am. It's too bad we don't live in a socialist country. Then everybody would probably have a fiber optic cable running into their house that a large number of cable companies could share. I hear there is at least one city here in the U.S. where everybody has fiber optics. But because of the monopoly thing, there isn't a whole hell of a lot of monitory incentive to make it as wide spread as it needs to be.
Click to expand...

Tin foil hats help with those radio waves. Do you have internet? If so, check out Roku, Firestick, or similar devices (or a Samsung smart TV). You can download many apps to them that have many free programs. For live TV try DirectTVNow which streams the same channels on DirectTV or cable for $25 a month and you don't need cable.

China and Cuba are socialist. I hear everybody there has free fiber optic cable.
 
coolzone said:
Now I think you're being full of shit just to annoy me. It's true that things were often screwed up in Europe at the time. After all, this was way-pre industrial revolution. They also had aristocracies. And of course slavery. One of the zillions of low points was that in England when they needed sailors, they would send press gangs out to capture them. But they did have literature and a little understanding in some scientific fields.
But to be "third world low life scum," you have to be worse than the country you are invading. The injuns were backwards heathen and barbarians. They were most often just as primitive as they were 5000 years earlier. And apart from the bloodthirsty cannibalistic Aztecs, they didn't have a written language. They were just bloodthirsty and sometimes cannibalistic. So you couldn't call the Europeans third world low life scum.
Click to expand...

Bwa ha ha ha ha, yes, that is the grand american creation myth. Perhaps you’re permanently annoyed by the truth which apparently you’ve never learned or are compelled to deny. The objective reality is that the savages were the euros, and they came with genocide, plunder and enslavement in mind; evident the moment they made land fall. Go back and read Columbus' first dispatches back home where he belonged seeing as how he was what we would now call an illegal murderous alien and not one of Europe’s best to be sending, but rather a murderer. Read what he wrote of the people he “found”.

It was euros who introduced scalping to North America. The Brits had established head hunting as a lucrative trade in dealing with the Irish, it’s just that the heads piled up so fast, they turned to scalps.

There were three vast and adanced agricultural societies in North America that far surpassed anything in Europe at the time; in the eastern portion of North America, in central Mexico, and the Andes. What made “Indians” “savages” in the euro’s eyes is the same nonsense we use to subjugate peoples via war today; they do not embrace our predatory version of capitalism and they do not follow our male dominator god or “way of life”. That’s all there is to it, ya’ll don’t manage your resources properly, so we will. And you need to die, move, disappear. “Cannibal” was the forerunner of “he gassed his own people”, it’s a get-out-of-jail-free-for-genocide-and-enslavement card. It was nothing but ignorance on the part of euros that they deemed nothing was developed or that the land was not managed. They just wanted what they saw and they slaughtered their way into/onto it.

From Columbus’ log:

They ... brought us parrots and balls of cotton and spears and many other things, which they exchanged for the glass beads and hawks' bells. They willingly traded everything they owned... . They were well-built, with good bodies and handsome features.... They do not bear arms, and do not know them, for I showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance. They have no iron. Their spears are made of cane... . They would make fine servants.... With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.

....................................................
As soon as I arrived in the Indies, on the first Island which I found, I took some of the natives by force in order that they might learn and might give me information of whatever there is in these parts.



Then of course there are the Papal Bulls of the 1500s calling for the extermination of native peoples.

The historical record is very clear, it's just that fake news has been around on the North American continent as long as euros have.
 
coolzone said:
Who cares about Venezuela. It's like caring about Vietnam or Libya. To hell with them all. I am a White person and I only care about White people. The problems they have in those other screwed up countries is part of the reason why. As for a kangaroo court, you couldn't do any worse than the Nuremberg Trials. Those scum could have found Mother Teresa guilty.
Click to expand...

We obviously care enough to send in our military of empire to slaughter in 2 of the 3 having nothing to do with defense and we'd love to figure out a way to justify the 3rd, and that's pretty much a white people in america thing doing this. America, a kangaroo nation never able to face what it is.
 
Threedee said:
Okay, Nazi. So, do you speak German and hate America?
Click to expand...

Thanks for the compliment. But despite that, I am not a member of the national socialist party. Neither have I read any of their literature. At least not directly. But reality is what it is. And it just so happens that just about everything you have heard and continue to hear about Hitler or WW II in general is a complete lie. It has been said that in war, truth is the first casualty. And from what I have seen, it remain a casualty. Also, it is said that history is written by the victors. But having won a fight doesn't mean the winners were in the right. And it certainly isn't the case with the allies. Another thing is a wise statement by Napoleon. He basically said that history is nothing but lies that have been agreed upon. That again is certainly true with most of what you know about Hitler and WW II. I could direct you to a book that speaks the truth. Far more than you have been conditioned to accept. So I doubt if you would look at it.
Next, no. I don't speak German. I am an American who comes from a long line of Americans. As for hating America, yes I do. Just as I hate a dirty house. It isn't the house that is at fault. It is all the filth in it. Everything I have been trying to do is clean it up. So I can again love it without resorting to a shitload of self deceptive lies. Which is something I have never been into anyway.
 
Fentoine Lum said:
We obviously care enough to send in our military of empire to slaughter in 2 of the 3 having nothing to do with defense and we'd love to figure out a way to justify the 3rd, and that's pretty much a white people in america thing doing this. America, a kangaroo nation never able to face what it is.
Click to expand...

so you are an anarchist?
 
Fentoine Lum said:
Bwa ha ha ha ha, yes, that is the grand american creation myth. Perhaps you’re permanently annoyed by the truth which apparently you’ve never learned or are compelled to deny. The objective reality is that the savages were the euros, and they came with genocide, plunder and enslavement in mind; evident the moment they made land fall. Go back and read Columbus' first dispatches back home where he belonged seeing as how he was what we would now call an illegal murderous alien and not one of Europe’s best to be sending, but rather a murderer. Read what he wrote of the people he “found”.

It was euros who introduced scalping to North America. The Brits had established head hunting as a lucrative trade in dealing with the Irish, it’s just that the heads piled up so fast, they turned to scalps.

There were three vast and adanced agricultural societies in North America that far surpassed anything in Europe at the time; in the eastern portion of North America, in central Mexico, and the Andes. What made “Indians” “savages” in the euro’s eyes is the same nonsense we use to subjugate peoples via war today; they do not embrace our predatory version of capitalism and they do not follow our male dominator god or “way of life”. That’s all there is to it, ya’ll don’t manage your resources properly, so we will. And you need to die, move, disappear. “Cannibal” was the forerunner of “he gassed his own people”, it’s a get-out-of-jail-free-for-genocide-and-enslavement card. It was nothing but ignorance on the part of euros that they deemed nothing was developed or that the land was not managed. They just wanted what they saw and they slaughtered their way into/onto it.

From Columbus’ log:

They ... brought us parrots and balls of cotton and spears and many other things, which they exchanged for the glass beads and hawks' bells. They willingly traded everything they owned... . They were well-built, with good bodies and handsome features.... They do not bear arms, and do not know them, for I showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance. They have no iron. Their spears are made of cane... . They would make fine servants.... With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.

....................................................
As soon as I arrived in the Indies, on the first Island which I found, I took some of the natives by force in order that they might learn and might give me information of whatever there is in these parts.



Then of course there are the Papal Bulls of the 1500s calling for the extermination of native peoples.

The historical record is very clear, it's just that fake news has been around on the North American continent as long as euros have.
Click to expand...

LINK
 
evince said:
LINK
Click to expand...

Not this time sugar, we've played this game before, you don't care, you don't want to know, no link will help your ilk. This is all publicly available information and you seem to have a computer and access to the internet.

You can find your poo fest somewhere else.

Be a good little american now and hide from the truth.
 
Flash said:
Tin foil hats help with those radio waves. Do you have internet? If so, check out Roku, Firestick, or similar devices (or a Samsung smart TV). You can download many apps to them that have many free programs. For live TV try DirectTVNow which streams the same channels on DirectTV or cable for $25 a month and you don't need cable.

China and Cuba are socialist. I hear everybody there has free fiber optic cable.
Click to expand...

There is no such thing as safe radiation. Including radio waves. I doubt if a tin foil hat would help. Next, I wouldn't be saying this here if I didn't have the internet. The thing is separating my computer from my TV service. There is one thing I do like about cable. Which I doubt the other options you spoke of has. A DVR. With a built in TV guide so I can see what is going to be shown and record them if I want to. I also like that they have the channels I want. Which as I said before, also has WAY more channels than I want. As for direct TV, the last time I checked into it I couldn't get it without a satellite dish. But I'll give it another look.
 
Fentoine Lum said:
Not this time sugar, we've played this game before, you don't care, you don't want to know, no link will help your ilk. This is all publicly available information and you seem to have a computer and access to the internet.

You can find your poo fest somewhere else.

Be a good little american now and hide from the truth.
Click to expand...

so your link is to a crap nut ball site

thanks
 
evince said:
words have meaning you idiot

its a simple question

you seem to hate EVERYFUCKINGTHING

do you?
Click to expand...

You just hate confronting reality love, that's all. And partisanshitheads like you are unable to have a conversation, you're just here to sling labels.
 
Fentoine Lum said:
Bwa ha ha ha ha, yes, that is the grand american creation myth. Perhaps you’re permanently annoyed by the truth which apparently you’ve never learned or are compelled to deny. The objective reality is that the savages were the euros, and they came with genocide, plunder and enslavement in mind; evident the moment they made land fall. Go back and read Columbus' first dispatches back home where he belonged seeing as how he was what we would now call an illegal murderous alien and not one of Europe’s best to be sending, but rather a murderer. Read what he wrote of the people he “found”.

It was euros who introduced scalping to North America. The Brits had established head hunting as a lucrative trade in dealing with the Irish, it’s just that the heads piled up so fast, they turned to scalps.

There were three vast and adanced agricultural societies in North America that far surpassed anything in Europe at the time; in the eastern portion of North America, in central Mexico, and the Andes. What made “Indians” “savages” in the euro’s eyes is the same nonsense we use to subjugate peoples via war today; they do not embrace our predatory version of capitalism and they do not follow our male dominator god or “way of life”. That’s all there is to it, ya’ll don’t manage your resources properly, so we will. And you need to die, move, disappear. “Cannibal” was the forerunner of “he gassed his own people”, it’s a get-out-of-jail-free-for-genocide-and-enslavement card. It was nothing but ignorance on the part of euros that they deemed nothing was developed or that the land was not managed. They just wanted what they saw and they slaughtered their way into/onto it.

From Columbus’ log:

They ... brought us parrots and balls of cotton and spears and many other things, which they exchanged for the glass beads and hawks' bells. They willingly traded everything they owned... . They were well-built, with good bodies and handsome features.... They do not bear arms, and do not know them, for I showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance. They have no iron. Their spears are made of cane... . They would make fine servants.... With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.

....................................................
As soon as I arrived in the Indies, on the first Island which I found, I took some of the natives by force in order that they might learn and might give me information of whatever there is in these parts.



Then of course there are the Papal Bulls of the 1500s calling for the extermination of native peoples.

The historical record is very clear, it's just that fake news has been around on the North American continent as long as euros have.
Click to expand...

WOW! Are you full of crap!!! So much so it's hard to list all the things you're wrong about. The Europeans didn't come here with genocide on their minds. At least not the White European ones. As for the Spanish, that is a different matter. At the outset, from what I hear, they sought spices and gold. As for the slavery thing, slavery was just a part of life to them. They were slaves to god, then to their kings, etc. etc. etc. So why not try to enslave those they found. As for Europeans from more White parts of Europe, slaves isn't what they traded in. Their first major trade crop was tobacco.
Another thing it was diseases brought here that wiped out most of the natives. Not genocide. You also disparage Columbus, (rightly so) then promote the bullshit he wrote. The natives on those islands did have weapons. Just not like European weapons. There was also a warlike tribe in the area that the Caribbean was loosely named after. They were feared by their enemies. If the tribe Columbus first encountered weren't of that tribe, surely they had means of defending themselves from them.
Another pile of crap is what you mention about Columbus calling them attractive. They were no different from any Amazon tribe I have ever seen on TV. The women were fat and ugly. And only to another indian could the men be considered to be handsome. Maybe what was going on was that they had been out to sea too long. But obviously what was really going on was that Columbus was overstating what he had found to puff himself up to the king and queen.
Next, I doubt if the Brits engaged in headhunting against the Irish. As for scalping, the Indians did far worse. Such as the Aztecs ripping the hearts out of captives as an offering to their gods. The bodies were then consumed by the populace. The shitheads in Europe used to come up with some rotten things. Like burning people alive or torturing them in some barbaric fashion. But the Indians in North America came up with some pretty good things themselves. Apart from also burning people alive. Sometimes they would skin people alive. Or bury them up to their heads in the sun to let the sun cook their brains. Or stake them out over a large ant mound and let the ants eat them alive. Sometimes they even let their women carry out the torture. And with that being the case, they probably sometimes let the children take part as well.
Also, various North American tribes also tried to wipe each other out. Sometimes successfully. Another thing is that words like Apache or Comanche is what enemy tribes called them. It isn't what they call themselves. And from what I heard, many of the Sioux and Blackfoot tribes still don't like each other. So all in all, when it comes to being lowlife scum, the injins were worse.
 
Fentoine Lum said:
We obviously care enough to send in our military of empire to slaughter in 2 of the 3 having nothing to do with defense and we'd love to figure out a way to justify the 3rd, and that's pretty much a white people in america thing doing this. America, a kangaroo nation never able to face what it is.
Click to expand...

White people?! You really don't know who's running things. I gave a link to a book that explains it all. You need to read it.
 
coolzone said:
WOW! Are you full of crap!!! So much so it's hard to list all the things you're wrong about. The Europeans didn't come here with genocide on their minds. At least not the White European ones. As for the Spanish, that is a different matter. At the outset, from what I hear, they sought spices and gold. As for the slavery thing, slavery was just a part of life to them. They were slaves to god, then to their kings, etc. etc. etc. So why not try to enslave those they found. As for Europeans from more White parts of Europe, slaves isn't what they traded in. Their first major trade crop was tobacco.
Another thing it was diseases brought here that wiped out most of the natives. Not genocide. You also disparage Columbus, (rightly so) then promote the bullshit he wrote. The natives on those islands did have weapons. Just not like European weapons. There was also a warlike tribe in the area that the Caribbean was loosely named after. They were feared by their enemies. If the tribe Columbus first encountered weren't of that tribe, surely they had means of defending themselves from them.
Another pile of crap is what you mention about Columbus calling them attractive. They were no different from any Amazon tribe I have ever seen on TV. The women were fat and ugly. And only to another indian could the men be considered to be handsome. Maybe what was going on was that they had been out to sea too long. But obviously what was really going on was that Columbus was overstating what he had found to puff himself up to the king and queen.
Next, I doubt if the Brits engaged in headhunting against the Irish. As for scalping, the Indians did far worse. Such as the Aztecs ripping the hearts out of captives as an offering to their gods. The bodies were then consumed by the populace. The shitheads in Europe used to come up with some rotten things. Like burning people alive or torturing them in some barbaric fashion. But the Indians in North America came up with some pretty good things themselves. Apart from also burning people alive. Sometimes they would skin people alive. Or bury them up to their heads in the sun to let the sun cook their brains. Or stake them out over a large ant mound and let the ants eat them alive. Sometimes they even let their women carry out the torture. And with that being the case, they probably sometimes let the children take part as well.
Also, various North American tribes also tried to wipe each other out. Sometimes successfully. Another thing is that words like Apache or Comanche is what enemy tribes called them. It isn't what they call themselves. And from what I heard, many of the Sioux and Blackfoot tribes still don't like each other. So all in all, when it comes to being lowlife scum, the injins were worse.
Click to expand...

Until you are able to pull yourself together emotionally, research Columbus' dispatches back home in his own words (a portion of which I provided here), research the Papal Bulls of the 1500s and the behavior of the Spanish upon landfall, you're going to continue to display tantrums resulting from the lies you were indictrinated with by your power structure as a child.

It is long past time to put away childish things.
 
coolzone said:
Thanks for the compliment. But despite that, I am not a member of the national socialist party. Neither have I read any of their literature. At least not directly. But reality is what it is. And it just so happens that just about everything you have heard and continue to hear about Hitler or WW II in general is a complete lie. It has been said that in war, truth is the first casualty. And from what I have seen, it remain a casualty. Also, it is said that history is written by the victors. But having won a fight doesn't mean the winners were in the right. And it certainly isn't the case with the allies. Another thing is a wise statement by Napoleon. He basically said that history is nothing but lies that have been agreed upon. That again is certainly true with most of what you know about Hitler and WW II. I could direct you to a book that speaks the truth. Far more than you have been conditioned to accept. So I doubt if you would look at it.
Next, no. I don't speak German. I am an American who comes from a long line of Americans. As for hating America, yes I do. Just as I hate a dirty house. It isn't the house that is at fault. It is all the filth in it. Everything I have been trying to do is clean it up. So I can again love it without resorting to a shitload of self deceptive lies. Which is something I have never been into anyway.
Click to expand...

1) Prove the history is wrong.
2) If you hate America, get the fuck out yesterday.
 
Fentoine Lum said:
Until you are able to pull yourself together emotionally, research Columbus' dispatches back home in his own words (a portion of which I provided here), research the Papal Bulls of the 1500s and the behavior of the Spanish upon landfall, you're going to continue to display tantrums resulting from the lies you were indictrinated with by your power structure as a child.

It is long past time to put away childish things.
Click to expand...

I don't care what Columbus's dispatches said. I already told you that he was likely overstating what he found to make himself look good to the king and queen. Also, hell would freeze over before I ever gave a crap about what any pope said, ever. Call it a "tantrum" if it makes you feel better. But the fact remains that the natives of the Western Hemisphere were more barbaric and a lot more ignorant than people from Europe at the time. And as I also mentioned, Europeans often didn't treat each other very well. So what makes you expect that they should have treated the natives any better. Who as I said, didn't treaty each other very well either. Even today there are some tribes in the Amazon for whom the words stranger and enemy are the same. Also, none of these things I learned as a child. But found out years later.
Is that "indoctrination" enough for you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top