AZ senator rogers calls to decertify election

not really. thanks for asking. how's yours?

Good.

We had a backyard lunch with my wife's sisters and their husbands. Lots of good conversation...and laughter. Had a fawn come over to beg for some food, but the fawn ran away when we offered it corn on the cob.

Going to an outdoor music night in a town near us this evening. My wife retired effective yesterday...so I am looking to have lots of activities to keep her occupied while she gets use to being out of work. She's been a workaholic for years...and I suspect the "retirement" is going to be more traumatic than she thinks. I've got golf to help me occupy time. She doesn't. She has plans for painting the living room, the master bedroom, and the kitchen. I've already told her I am not going to help with any painting unless she switches to oils on canvas.
 
You don't care about election integrity?

We are watching you Trumpys destroy election integrity. You lost every damn recount. Trump lost 61 court cases. And still, the reds push on. There is someone gutting Americans' faith in elections, but it is not the Dems.
 
They did.

No. Congress did not choose any of the electors. You lie or misunderstood the process.

Into the Night:

“Currently, it looks like GA is going to choose Republican electors.
AZ looks like it might also, but seems to be further away from actually choosing.”

“Only religions use supporting evidence. Science doesn't.”

“The phrase “freedom of speech” does not appear in the Constitution”

Trump’s lawsuit does not claim social media providers are “state actors”

These Democrats have committed a felony. (Texas Dems leaving state).
 
ARIZ. STATE SEN. ROGERS SAYS AUDIT NUMBERS JUSTIFY DECERTIFICATION
Arizona state Sen. Wendy Rogers (R) recently laid out her ideas on how to move forward in the state’s forensic audit. The Republican said this effort “is absolutely imperative” and she “will be fighting, fighting, fighting.”

During an interview on Tuesday, she stated there is enough evidence of fraud to begin decertifying 2020 presidential election results in Maricopa County. The audit found massive discrepancies, including over 74,000 mail-in ballots that appear to have never been sent.

Rogers confirmed the state legislature could decertify the results with a joint resolution, but would need a Senate majority vote. The Republican lawmaker said she’s confident that Senate President Karen Fann will follow through on enforcement.

“We have to finish the audit, we have to hold the Maricopa County supervisors accountable to include possibly sending them to jail,” stated the state senator. “There is already enough information to justify this.”

https://wendyrogers.org/ariz-state-sen-rogers-says-audit-numbers-justify-decertification/

Hell Yeah!

jesus-is-my-savior-trump-is-my-president-bandana.jpg


In twelve days Trump will reclaim the the white-house, and once again we will have capable and competent leadership again?!!:whoa:
 
you are such a dickhead!! you do not understand words!!

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, ...

Article II Section 1 | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov ...


Electoral College Fast Facts | US House of Representatives ...https://history.house.gov › Institution › Electoral-College
Electors. Most states require that all electoral votes go to the candidate who receives the most votes in that state. After state election officials certify the ...

Electoral College :: Article II. Executive Department :: US ...https://law.justia.com › constitution › article-2 › 03-elec...
Clause 2. Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and ...(in Arizona the state legislature says the party of the candidate who has the most votes get to pick the 11 electors, stupid shit)

Read this complete Arizona Revised Statutes Title 16. Elections and Electors § 16-212. Election of presidential electors;  electoral college votes;  vacancy;  replacement on Westlaw

A. On the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, 1956, and quadrennially thereafter, there shall be elected a number of presidential electors equal to the number of United States senators and representatives in Congress from this state.

B. After the secretary of state issues the statewide canvass containing the results of a presidential election, the presidential electors of this state shall cast their electoral college votes for the candidate for president and the candidate for vice president who jointly received the highest number of votes in this state as prescribed in the canvass.

C. A presidential elector who knowingly refuses to cast that elector's electoral college vote as prescribed in subsection B of this section is no longer eligible to hold the office of presidential elector and that office is deemed and declared vacant by operation of law.  The chairperson of the state committee of the political party represented by that elector shall appoint a person who is otherwise qualified to be a presidential elector.  The replacement presidential elector shall cast the elector's electoral college vote as prescribed by this section.  Notwithstanding § 16-344 and any other statute, the nomination paper and affidavit of qualification of the replacement presidential elector may be completed and filed with the secretary of state as soon as is practicable after the presidential elector's appointment.

https://codes.findlaw.com/az/title-16-elections-and-electors/az-rev-st-sect-16-212.html

Thank you for quoting the relevant passage in Article II. Only the legislature can choose the electors. If they use a vote system, only the legislature can certify such a vote. Only the legislature of a State can choose the electors.
 
We are watching you Trumpys destroy election integrity.
Not possible. Democrats already did that.
You lost every damn recount.
Counting fake ballots again is meaningless.
Trump lost 61 court cases.
There were not 61 court cases filed by Trump. You still believe in this random number, don't you?
And still, the reds push on. There is someone gutting Americans' faith in elections, but it is not the Dems.
It's gutted, thanks to the Democrats.
 
No. Congress did not choose any of the electors. You lie or misunderstood the process.

Into the Night:

“Currently, it looks like GA is going to choose Republican electors.
AZ looks like it might also, but seems to be further away from actually choosing.”

“Only religions use supporting evidence. Science doesn't.”

“The phrase “freedom of speech” does not appear in the Constitution”

Trump’s lawsuit does not claim social media providers are “state actors”

These Democrats have committed a felony. (Texas Dems leaving state).

Yes they did. They broke the law. You again deny the Constitution.
 
did fauci ever say masks were uselss against the virus?

Don't really know. But it is irrelevant to whether a state decertifies the election results.

When it doesn't happen you will come up with some new magical event to overturn the election.
 
At least seven States never certified their election results. Their legislatures never chose any electors.

Sure they did. They followed all the correct procedures and the certifications are all available at the National Archives.

Because a few rogue Republicans dissented does not affect the official results:

"Arizona officials certified the results of the general election on Monday, confirming Democratic President-elect Joe Biden’s victory in the state and clearing the way for Mark Kelly to take a seat in the U.S. Senate as soon as Wednesday."

The legislature chooses the electors when they passed the law providing that the electors are those chosen by the political party winning the popular vote in that state. Biden won AZ and therefore the 11 electors chosen by the Democratic party are certified by the state.

Very simple. You are denying the Constitution and the constitutional powers of the states to choose electors because you don't like the results.
 
Sure they did. They followed all the correct procedures and the certifications are all available at the National Archives.
The National Archives is not a valid reference. False authority fallacy. At least seven States never chose their electors.
Because a few rogue Republicans dissented does not affect the official results:
I am not talking about a few, and I am not talking about Republicans. There are NO official results. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.
"Arizona officials certified the results of the general election on Monday, confirming Democratic President-elect Joe Biden’s victory in the state and clearing the way for Mark Kelly to take a seat in the U.S. Senate as soon as Wednesday."
These 'officials' have no authority to choose the electors for the State of AZ.
The legislature chooses the electors when they passed the law providing that the electors are those chosen by the political party winning the popular vote in that state. Biden won AZ and therefore the 11 electors chosen by the Democratic party are certified by the state.
Paradox. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox, dude.
Very simple. You are denying the Constitution and the constitutional powers of the states to choose electors because you don't like the results.
No, I am not. It is YOU denying the Constitution. Inversion fallacy. AZ never chose the electors for their State.
 
The National Archives is not a valid reference. False authority fallacy. At least seven States never chose their electors.

I am not talking about a few, and I am not talking about Republicans. There are NO official results. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.

These 'officials' have no authority to choose the electors for the State of AZ.

Paradox. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox, dude.

No, I am not. It is YOU denying the Constitution. Inversion fallacy. AZ never chose the electors for their State.

The National Archives is not a false authority. Your conclusions are based on your false belief that election fraud occurred. That is your furtive fallacy--claiming an event happened with no evidence to support it which makes your entire premise fake news.
 
Back
Top