Lorca
Don't fence me in
I do not. Ever. Republicans/conservatives often do, with their socially-motivated legislation.
I believe in personal responsibility.
Behind the Roar of Political Debates, Whispers of Race Persist
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
I do not. Ever. Republicans/conservatives often do, with their socially-motivated legislation.
I believe in personal responsibility.
Boris The Animal
It's Just Boris!
That's where you are dead wrong. You believe Government should be the end all to America's problems.
Lorca
Don't fence me in
Boris The Animal
It's Just Boris!
No, very correctly. it's the "progressive" mindset. the Hive mentality. This is why Conservatives are not welcome in your party.
Lorca
Don't fence me in
Heh heh heh....*We* have a hive mentality when your mind is locked up so tight it tells other people what they believe based on knee-jerk party line thinking?
ooooooookaaayyyyyyy @_@
Boris is as dumb as any Limbaugh troll
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
lol.....of course they do.......Democrats are the ones whispering.......
evince
Truthmatters
Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy
The dismissal of U.S. Attorneys controversy was initiated by the unprecedented[1] midterm dismissal of seven United States Attorneys on December 7, 2006, by the George W. Bush administration's Department of Justice. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[2][3] The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.[4][5][6][7][8]
The dismissed U.S. Attorneys had all been appointed by President George W. Bush and confirmed by the Senate, more than four years earlier.[9][10] Two other attorneys were dismissed in controversial circumstances in 2005–2006. Twenty-six or more U.S. Attorneys had been under consideration for dismissal during this time period.[11][12][13] The firings received attention via hearings in Congress in January 2007, and by March 2007 the controversy had national visibility. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales stated that the U.S. Attorneys "serve at the pleasure of the president" and described the affair as "an overblown personnel matter".[14][15]
By mid-September 2007, nine of the highest-level officers of the Department of Justice associated with the controversy had resigned,[16][17][18][19] most prominently, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...never-vote-for-this-guy&p=1361629#post1361629
The dismissal of U.S. Attorneys controversy was initiated by the unprecedented[1] midterm dismissal of seven United States Attorneys on December 7, 2006, by the George W. Bush administration's Department of Justice. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[2][3] The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.[4][5][6][7][8]
The dismissed U.S. Attorneys had all been appointed by President George W. Bush and confirmed by the Senate, more than four years earlier.[9][10] Two other attorneys were dismissed in controversial circumstances in 2005–2006. Twenty-six or more U.S. Attorneys had been under consideration for dismissal during this time period.[11][12][13] The firings received attention via hearings in Congress in January 2007, and by March 2007 the controversy had national visibility. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales stated that the U.S. Attorneys "serve at the pleasure of the president" and described the affair as "an overblown personnel matter".[14][15]
By mid-September 2007, nine of the highest-level officers of the Department of Justice associated with the controversy had resigned,[16][17][18][19] most prominently, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...never-vote-for-this-guy&p=1361629#post1361629
evince
Truthmatters
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...51C1A96F9C8B63
U.S. Judge Opposes Republicans On Elections
By JOHN SCHWARTZ
Published: December 3, 2009
The Republican National Committee will not be able to use election tactics that have been linked to suppression of voting by racial minorities without court supervision, a federal judge in New Jersey has ruled.
and this court documented proof
I have yet to meet one righty who admits to these truths
no one who cheats and then lies and denies the obvious proof they are cheating shitheels is reasonable.
Not one republican or even libertarian or what ever the hell you calls your elves to distance you from your only power source.
the republican party
U.S. Judge Opposes Republicans On Elections
By JOHN SCHWARTZ
Published: December 3, 2009
The Republican National Committee will not be able to use election tactics that have been linked to suppression of voting by racial minorities without court supervision, a federal judge in New Jersey has ruled.
and this court documented proof
I have yet to meet one righty who admits to these truths
no one who cheats and then lies and denies the obvious proof they are cheating shitheels is reasonable.
Not one republican or even libertarian or what ever the hell you calls your elves to distance you from your only power source.
the republican party
cawacko
Well-known member
Really? Based on your definition a majority of whites vote for Republicans over Democrats. Are the Democrats racist towards whites or anti-white?
evince
Truthmatters
http://www.thenation.com/blog/17109...ople-romney-won-white-vote-almost-everywhere#
the robmoney numbers
If only white people had voted on Tuesday, Mitt Romney would have carried every state except for Massachusetts, Iowa, Connecticut and New Hampshire, according to the news media’s exit polls. Nationally, Romney won 59 percent of the white vote, a towering twenty-point margin over Obama. (Exit polls were canceled in nineteen states by the consortium of news media that run them.)
the robmoney numbers
If only white people had voted on Tuesday, Mitt Romney would have carried every state except for Massachusetts, Iowa, Connecticut and New Hampshire, according to the news media’s exit polls. Nationally, Romney won 59 percent of the white vote, a towering twenty-point margin over Obama. (Exit polls were canceled in nineteen states by the consortium of news media that run them.)
cawacko
Well-known member
We can go back to '04 when Bush won 40% of the Hispanic vote. Is that an insignificant number?
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
why are you so racist?