Diogenes
1 account to rule them all
You could ask your .... sources ... to help you decide, couldn't you?
Somebody would have to check me on it, but AFAIK neither the Talmud nor the Greek philosopher Celsus openly claim Mary was raped. One might possibly leap to that inference though. Celsus claimed the name of the Roman soldier was Panteras, or something like that.Regarding the Roman soldier story, was it consensual or rape? Romans were pretty well known for being rapists....just like those in the MAGA party.
I’m not at liberty to say. They informed me on the condition of anonymity.
Hah! Look at Cypress trying to mess Christmas up, what an absolute faux intellectual miserable cretin.A premarital pregnancy would have been a scandal in first century Jewish Galilee, bringing dishonor to the family of the woman.
Most scholars are predisposed to accept a historical reality of Mary becoming pregnant outside of wedlock. When such a damaging story appears in the gospels the underlying oral or written tradition was too persistent to ignore by first century authors. The Babylonian Torah seems to claim Mary was impregnated by a Roman soldier.
Luke and Matthew get around this problem by using the Hebrew Bible to frame the birth of Jesus in a theological context. The question is whether the birth narratives in Luke and Matthew are only based on prophecy, or based on an authentic and long standing oral tradition.
The miraculous virgin birth narrative is only briefly mentioned in Luke and Matthew, composed around 80 to 85 AD.
Authors writing much earlier, Paul and Mark, make no mention of a virgin birth. Paul seems to allude that Jesus did not become divine until after he was crucified.
John and the author of Peter I and II make no mention of a virgin birth.
The gnostic gospel of Thomas and the other recognized Gnostic writings do not mention a virgin birth.
It is remarkable that an event so momentous and unprecedented as a virgin birth fulfilling Hebrew prophecy is not mentioned by these other authors.
Conclusion: the miraculous Virgin birth narrative is a later legendary account composed and framed by Luke and Matthew for theological reasons.
Okay, so if Mark predates Luke and Matthew, why is Jesus a grown man at the beginning of Mark?Then you would have to explain why Mary in Mark's gospel - which predates Luke and Mathew - doesn't seem to know Jesus is son of God. Mary and Jesus' siblings hear about his ministry and faith healings and seem to think Jesus has gone mad
If the angel Gabriel came to tell Mary the holy spirit would cause her to give birth to the Son of God, why does Mary seem to not understand who Jesus is in Mark's gospel?
What do you care? Nothing you do on this forum even approximates a minimal attempt to emulate the example of JesusHah! Look at Cypress trying to mess Christmas up, what an absolute faux intellectual miserable cretin.
Merry Christmas all!
Wow, you're really dumb.Okay, so if Mark predates Luke and Matthew, why is Jesus a grown man at the beginning of Mark?
Who say Mark predates Luke and Matthew?
I call out shitbags like Jesus did. Shitbag!What do you care? Nothing you do on this forum even approximates a minimal attempt to emulate the example of Jesus
Is that so? So who dated the books of The Bible, cupcake?Wow, you're really dumb.
^^ Claims to honor the birth of Jesus, while shitting on the example Jesus setI call out shitbags like Jesus did. Shitbag!
Religious scholars. You're way out of your pay grade if this is your first time hearing Mark is regarded as the earliest gospel.So who dated the books of The Bible, cupcake?
Linko, Pinko-?Religious scholars. You're way out of your pay grade if this is your first time hearing Mark is regarded as the earliest gospel.
I think invoking miracles have to be pretty far down the list of explanations.I've never seen a miracle that couldn't be explained by odds or "luck".
Isn't it odd that there were many "miracles" reported in ancient times yet not modern times? I know the Catholic church looks into some things such miracles and sainthood, but, again, I'm not buying as something other than misperception or just the odds.
Consider the Trump assassination. Some claim it was divine providence that he survived. Does that mean God hates the two people who were killed, including the nutjob shooting at Trump, and the two people severely wounded? No, since, IMO, God is all merciful. It's just the odds and examples of human beings making choices.
Yes, he is....and probably drunk at this time of day. It's pretty common among JPP MAGAts.Wow, you're really dumb.
All MAGAts are hypocrites too. Sad.^^ Claims to honor the birth of Jesus, while shitting on the example Jesus set
Ditto on MAGAts not being too bright....or sober.Religious scholars. You're way out of your pay grade if this is your first time hearing Mark is regarded as the earliest gospel.
Alcohol or crack cocaine must be involved somehowYes, he is....and probably drunk at this time of day. It's pretty common among JPP MAGAts.
False. You're just a miserable Jesus-hating moron with very limited vision.Alcohol or crack cocaine must be involved somehow
Wilson set the tone for US intervention in wars affecting our national security and economy. Notice that Truman continued to response without blinking an eye. IMO, the War Department briefings clearly laid out the "what ifs" and the consequences of failing to act.I think invoking miracles has to be pretty far down the list of explanations.
I do tend to think there is something to fate. How is it we got both Churchill and FDR at the exact right moment, in the face of isolationism in the US and appeasement in the UK?