Can any leftist answer?

AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST.

I think this might be important for you so I'll repeat it a couple times so you can figure it out:

AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST.
AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST.AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST.AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST.AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST.AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST.AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST.AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST.AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST.AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST.AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST.AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST.AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST.AOC IS NOT A SCIENTIST
Of course she isn't, but she like most if not all you lefties keep repeating just how dangerous and just how we're headed to a doomsday finality if we taxpayers don't cough up more money to fund your ridiculous and inane Green New Deal nonsense.
Got to stop all those cows from farting, don't ya know!
 
Of course she isn't, but she like most if not all you lefties keep repeating just how dangerous and just how we're headed to a doomsday finality if we taxpayers don't cough up more money to fund your ridiculous and inane Green New Deal nonsense.
Got to stop all those cows from farting, don't ya know!

You don't know what the scientists actually say. And even if you did you wouldn't understand it. AOC is simple to understand and NOT A SCIENTIST.

Maybe when you want to talk about SCIENCE YOU SHOULD FUCKING LISTEN TO WHAT THE SCIENTISTS SAY.
 
You don't know what the scientists actually say. And even if you did you wouldn't understand it. AOC is simple to understand and NOT A SCIENTIST.

Maybe when you want to talk about SCIENCE YOU SHOULD FUCKING LISTEN TO WHAT THE SCIENTISTS SAY.
Take your own advice, Sybil. It is YOU that is denying theories of science. You discard the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, Kirchoff's law, and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

It is YOU denying these theories of science, Sybil.
 
Take your own advice, Sybil. It is YOU that is denying theories of science. You discard the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, Kirchoff's law, and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

It is YOU denying these theories of science, Sybil.
tlwm9kS.jpg
 
Why should I answer a spam troll like Legion? You don't believe half the things you post and just argue for amusement. You proved that enough by posting as The Harris Administration and immediately switching sides after the election and changing to The Trump Administration.
 
Why should I answer a spam troll like Legion? You don't believe half the things you post and just argue for amusement. You proved that enough by posting as The Harris Administration and immediately switching sides after the election and changing to The Trump Administration.


Let the record show that Triggered Lizard cannot answer either, by their own admission.
 
You don't know what the scientists actually say. And even if you did you wouldn't understand it. AOC is simple to understand and NOT A SCIENTIST.

Maybe when you want to talk about SCIENCE YOU SHOULD FUCKING LISTEN TO WHAT THE SCIENTISTS SAY.
Were these scientists around thousands of years ago when the earth was first formed, so that they could give their expertise in
knowing or in scientifically declaring that our current earth is under a massive crisis concerning it's actual existence is in jeopardy now? Those scientists of today would have a much clearer vision of just when our earth is going down for good (if it does go down for good) by getting in touch with our Christian GOD.
 
Reposted to remind the leftists of the challenge:

➊ You claim that the Earth is overheating. You say it’s “too hot.” So, what is the correct global mean surface temperature (GMST) for life on Earth and why? Please provide a numerical answer. Use units and round it to the nearest tenth of a degree Celsius. Then, explain why that value is ideal and cite evidence to justify your answer.

➋ What is the correct atmospheric CO₂ level for life on Earth? What level optimizes our agricultural productivity? What CO₂ level will make weather less scary? Give your answer as an exact value in a mole fraction or volume percentage, and then explain why that value is ideal.

➌ What makes CO₂ “pollution”? The EPA considers CO₂ to be a pollutant, legally speaking, under the Clean Air Act, and their scientific justification is simply that, it “…𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑔𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑡ℎ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑒.” https://epa.gov/climate-change/endangerment-and-cause-or-contribute-findings-greenhouse-gases-under-section-202a…That seems pretty ambiguous. Because by that measure, water vapor should also be classified as a “pollutant” because it’s also a “greenhouse gas” (GHG) — in fact, it’s the most abundant GHG and it absorbs a wider spectrum of IR wavelengths than CO₂. So, what makes CO₂ pollution?

➍ Why are temperature departures from 1850-1900 climate conditions deemed as the human welfare control knob given that the overall human condition has never been better than it is today? How is was climate during the end of the Little Ice Age — the coldest period in the last 10,000-years — preferable to today’s? On what account was the weather more benign? By what measure? Be specific. Tell me how the climate was supposedly less dangerous in the 17-19th centuries.

➎ The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that President Biden signed into law in 2022 was popularized as the “biggest climate bill in history,” but ever since the bill was signed, climate alarmists insist climate change has only gotten worse. Why are we not seeing the bill work its magic? What’s not working? https://axios.com/2024/07/21/biden-legacy-election-2024…

➏ The estimated cost of net zero by the year 2050 in the U.S. is $75 trillion ($3 trillion per year), according to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen. https://politico.com/news/2024/07/27/yellen-amazon-climate-change-00171522… That’s a hefty price tag. And with ~165 million U.S. taxpayers, it would cost each of us >$450,000 to get to “net zero” by the target date. Are you willing to shell out that money, or do you just expect that everyone else will foot the bill for you?

➐ If we spend $75 trillion to decarbonize the economy by 2050, by how much will it reduce the GMST by the end of the century? Please provide your answer to the nearest tenth of a degree Celsius and show your calculations. What does the perfect climate look like? How will we know when we get there? By what measure? If you don’t know the answer to question six, are we supposed to spend $75 trillion and just see what happens?

➑ If “combating climate change” is a global concerted effort, why do China and India get a free pass to continue emitting CO₂ without bound? Why are they never criticized?

➒ Why are you so vehemently opposed to the deployment of nuclear power? It is the safest, most sustainable “carbon-free” energy technology, and without the compliance regulations, it isn’t expensive when compared to solar PV and wind, which are inefficient, intermittent, costly add-ons to existing electricity generation sources.

➓ If humans are parasites on the Earth and we are destroying it, why not be the change you want to see and decarbonize yourself?
 
What's hilarious about that is that the 2014 winter saw the LARGEST ice extent ever recorded in the Antarctic...just 6 months later! It was a cold winter for them that year! Oh, and the penguins and other wildlife is still there!

So much for the Sierra Club.
 
That was horrible. NASA is deeply involved in monitoring climate change. They have trained scientists doing the work. They have been at it for decades. The appeal to authority is a win, They are the authorities on climate change and you are not. The answer is complete and solid.
DF13CF49-85C2-4C4A-B42D-0034D1759AEB_large.JPEG
 
Back
Top