Can you forgive those who put "unvaccinated" people through a living hell for 2+ yrs?


Yeah.

d3nulYH.jpg
 
I can only assume that you agree with the long list of other items that I brought up since you have neglected to form arguments against them. ;) ;)

How do you think states determine who wins that state's electoral votes? If there is no popular vote Trump lied (again) when he claimed to have won the popular vote in 2016.
Your questions are answered in the Constitution.
 
Next we should be apologizing to Trump for being mad that he stole top secret classified documents.
Trump didn't steal anything. He was GIVEN COPIES OF those documents, of which he has since declassified. Each government agency still has in their possession the originals of those documents. Trump, once again, has not committed any crimes.

And to the rioters for trying to overthrow the government.
Do you mean these rioters? https://www.justice.gov/usao-or/pr/...eeknight-protests-federal-courthouse-portland

Or these rioters? https://interdependentcourts.com/2021/01/24/another-federal-courthouse-attacked-by-a-mob/

Or these rioters? https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/kav...e-120-arrested-capitol-hill/story?id=58048599

Or even the rioters who stormed into and occupied the Wisconsin State capitol in 2011 during the Act 10 riots? https://www.maciverinstitute.com/2021/02/act-10-at-10-remembering-the-riots/

All you have is one single example of one single peaceful protest event (with regular calls from Trump and others to remain peaceful during it) that was infiltrated by Antifa/BLM/FBI... I can go on and on and on with examples in which BLM/Antifa/Demonkkkrat rioters got violent, vandalized, and stormed capitol and other government buildings all across the nation.

Why don't you take any offense to any of those plethora of riot examples yet take extreme offense to J6 and only J6? Obviously you aren't offended by riots at all, so stop pretending that you are.

And to Herschel Walker for pointing out that we are pointing out that he is what Repubicans call a 'murderer'.
What are you talking about?

And to Alex Jones for calling him on his disgusting subhuman conspiracy theories.
What are "subhuman conspiracy theories"? What "conspiracy theories" are you referring to?

You don't actually take offense to conspiracy theories either because you were perfectly fine with the 2016/2017 conspiracy theory that Donald Trump was an illegitimate President because Russia colluded with him in the 2016 election. This shows that you don't actually have any problem with "election denial" either, since you were perfectly okay with it when Demonkkkrats did it in the past, such as 2000, 2004, 2016, and 2018.

Let me get started on my apology tour by saying to bird brain 'FUCK YOU'.

Good start?
... and likewise, fuck your communism.

Happy now?
 
I actually like Christians who aren't threatened by being asked to do things that might help other people. Otherwise it isn't "Christianity". :)
Generally speaking, I like doing things that help other people. I don't like doing things that harm other people.
 
Last edited:
I like doing things that help other people. I don't like doing things that harm other people.

And in your vast knowledge of virology and communicable diseases you sit at the Right Hand of the Father...

Sorry but elevating one's own ignorance to that level and worshipping it isn't a good thing.
 
The doctors.
... and who is that, exactly? How can an unspecified group of people lead you to rationally believe that a COVID jab can keep you out of the hospital?

Let's just say you don't usually use it as a noun like you did. It's kind of its own statement by itself. :)

Now if you were to actually say that outloud with the Latin translated it would read:

"Continued thus it is shown that you want to be irrational". What you PROBABLY meant (so you wouldn't sound stupid) was: "QED that you want to be irrational". Thus it is shown that you want to be irrational.

That and your general overall ignorance indicated to me you probably weren't familiar with the Latin. Maybe you're just really bad with English grammar and syntax?
Nope. My grammar was fine, and yours is flawed. You are incorrect about what QED means.
 
Never said I was.
Given that The Bible is correct, you have already attempted to assume the position of Jesus Christ.

But if you think Christianity is best displayed by those who are unwilling to take personal actions that might help other people
Not what Christianity is about.

For example, I am unwilling to shoot a police officer in order to help out an active drug dealer that this police officer is attempting to arrest for his drug dealing crime(s). Does that mean that I am "not displaying Christianity very well" because I am "unwilling to take personal actions that might help other people"?

then you and I have a very different version of Christianity.
Yes, we most certainly do, as you seem to not even understand what Christianity is to begin with.

I suspect very highly a conversation with YOU about Christianity would be hilarious.
It most definitely would be, as I can clearly tell that you would already completely embarrass yourself due to your lack of knowledge about Christianity.
 
which alternative facts?

ballots with no chain of custody = bad election. fact.

Oh no, you just brought up some evidence of election fraud...

Yet I still keep hearing to this very day that there is "no evidence of election fraud".

Hmmmm..... Denial much?
 
Back
Top