Chavez On Private Schools: Teach Socialism or Face Takeover

OrnotBitwise said:
I, on the other hand, do not want a society that allows parents to selectively choose whatever nonsense they wish to teach their children. I think there have to be certain minimum standards. They can be (and should be) quite broad but they have to be there.

The most common form of child abuse is parental. It's unpleasant and disquieting but quite true. And teaching one's child in such a way as to exclude the child from full participation in society as an adult is clearly child abuse, in my view.
Click to expand...
What on earth? Who the hell are you to define society as having to include public schools?
I know plenty of people who went to private schools and live fine in society, hell I wouldn't be surprised if more than half the Democrat politicians went to private school.

Moreover it is clearly NOT abuse to abstain from society or pieces of it. Ridiculous leftist idiocy.
 
blackascoal said:
No, you're the idiot.

The Venezulan people have every right to do what is in the best interest of their people .. and guess what? .. You don't get a say in what THEY theink is best for THEM.

What Venezula is now is better prepared to educate their people and increase their opportunity through a variety of programs designed to do ust that .. and THEY are using THEIR oil resources for THEIR people.

ONLY an idiot would be whining about what Venezulans peacefully do for THEIR own people.
Click to expand...

OK.
 
Last edited:
OrnotBitwise said:
I, on the other hand, do not want a society that allows parents to selectively choose whatever nonsense they wish to teach their children. I think there have to be certain minimum standards. They can be (and should be) quite broad but they have to be there.

The most common form of child abuse is parental. It's unpleasant and disquieting but quite true. And teaching one's child in such a way as to exclude the child from full participation in society as an adult is clearly child abuse, in my view.
Click to expand...

I've already said that brainwashing kids in a curriculum isn't a very effective tactic. That's what they tried to do in Russia - didn't work very well.
 
So no one has an opinion about mugabe FORCING tution to not go up in Zimbabwe. I mean they are private schools.
 
Darla said:
Why? You think Capitalism is so superior? I think this is crazy, honestly. Just crazy.
Click to expand...

Of course capitalism is superior. Socialism proven itself terrible through hundreds of failed utopias.

The best, of course, is a mixed economy. Like, for instance, Britians.
 
Well, honestly, I just the Mugabe's trying to cover for the fact that his policies have made the economy unsustainable, and prices NEED to rise. I'm not hatin' on the poor or anything. But I've heard reports on this. People giving back foreign remmittances to Zimbabwean relatives often have their money rendered practically worhtless by the time it gets to them.
 
RStringfield said:
Yeah, it's a horrible idea. They need to do something about their ridiculous inflation.
Click to expand...

I don't think you gave that fauxrage the same intensity you did about Chavez. I'd need to see the normal exclamation marks, curse words, and long winded rhetoric to be convinced.
 
LadyT said:
I don't think you gave that fauxrage the same intensity you did about Chavez. I'd need to see the normal exclamation marks, curse words, and long winded rhetoric to be convinced.
Click to expand...

God damn, motherfucking Mugabe!!! How's that?

I have not seen a story on this. Had to hunt to see what you were talking about and could not find much. Liberal media is obviously supressing the catastrophe caused by the socialist policies. :)
 
I think the reason Chavez gets more attention is because of his anti-US rhetoric, anti-capitalist rhetoric. Whereas Mugabe is pretty much just a strongman dictator that has no real goal in life other than staying in power.
 
Hugo getas the attention because of the stance Bush and the neocons take on him.
The "liberal" media is eager to follow along.
 
Damocles said:
Watching a Socialist takeover of a nation is nothing to ignore. I'd rather not allow that to become part of our history because we ignored it somewhere else and dismissed it as 'unimportant' and negligible because it was their own choice.
Click to expand...

What in the hell makes you believe that YOU get to deciode what other people want?

That is simply amazing to me. I mean mindblowing fucking amazing.
 
uscitizen said:
Hugo getas the attention because of the stance Bush and the neocons take on him.
The "liberal" media is eager to follow along.
Click to expand...


Yep. Since bush voters are too embarrased to defend their hero, this is a back door way to defend bush. By attacking some petty third world president, who has a habit of bashing bush. That's all it is. There are far, far worse countries and presidents in the world, who don't get 5% of the posts and threads that Chavez does.

:cof1:
 
Battleborne said:
a communist sympathizer along with darla,lady t,and cippie...like we really don't know where it is you are coming from...'che' avatar ring a bell..y'all love the che' avatar we all get it already...go have fun in the park with darla et al...she is a fat idiot anyway...have fun!
Click to expand...

This from the mind of a pervert.

I'll file this one under "abnormal"

By the way, I'm not a communist, I'm a socialist liberal.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top