Watermark is a converted Democrat.The cult of libertarians
Watermark is a converted Democrat.The cult of libertarians
When did I say we should intervene? What gives you the right to decide what I want? Thank the GODS we have the constitution to protect me from the tyranny of the majority.What in the hell makes you believe that YOU get to deciode what other people want?
That is simply amazing to me. I mean mindblowing fucking amazing.
What in the hell makes you believe that YOU get to deciode what other people want?
That is simply amazing to me. I mean mindblowing fucking amazing.
Watermark is a converted Democrat.
He's not really "deciding", black. He's discussing it, and obviously he'd dissaprove.
If Alabama were going socialist he'd say the same thing.
Yep. Since bush voters are too embarrased to defend their hero, this is a back door way to defend bush. By attacking some petty third world president, who has a habit of bashing bush. That's all it is. There are far, far worse countries and presidents in the world, who don't get 5% of the posts and threads that Chavez does.
Some his remarks are more like a perverted democrat.
That's sad.
When did I say we should intervene? What gives you the right to decide what I want? Thank the GODS we have the constitution to protect me from the tyranny of the majority.
And what exact thing did I say that would make a choice for anybody but myself?
You amaze me, the way you deliberately ignore parts of things to pretend that I, or another (R. Paul for instance) has said something that they haven't. It's like arguing with Asshat about Kabbalism.
Watching a Socialist takeover of a nation is nothing to ignore. I'd rather not allow that to become part of our history because we ignored it somewhere else and dismissed it as 'unimportant' and negligible because it was their own choice.
I was talking about OUR history and that I would work against any such change. Not theirs. And I have as much right to work within the system to effect the change I want to see as you do. I will fight against making this nation into a socialist nation.When did I say you said we should intervene?
My comment was directed to this ...
I was talking about OUR history and that I would work against any such change. Not theirs. And I have as much right to work within the system to effect the change I want to see as you do. I will fight against making this nation into a socialist nation.
Don't attempt to silence me, I have a right to speak out against such systems of government invading my system.
I will fight against making this nation into a socialist nation.
...
A better use of your time would be to fight to end bush's war, to restore the constitutional freedoms we've lost, to fight poverty, etc.
He is doing that, since the trend towards centralization of power is THE cause of two and the biggest factor in the third.
I will fight against making this nation into a socialist nation.
Surely there are better uses of your time. This nation is never going to be a socialist nation, whatever that really means. The dictionary definition means centralized government control over manufacturing, production, and distribution. Calm down my man. That ain't going to happen except in the fevered imagination of Lyndon Larouche types.
A better use of your time would be to fight to end bush's war, to restore the constitutional freedoms we've lost, to fight poverty, etc.
Yep. Since bush voters are too embarrased to defend their hero, this is a back door way to defend bush. By attacking some petty third world president, who has a habit of bashing bush.
My cat once proposed an extremely interesting economic theorem to me in the heat of debate.