Once again, you jump directly to ad hominems and vast assumptions. Just because I'm conservative doesn't mean I'm an apologist for the Confederacy.
Yes it does. Because Conservatives were the Confederacy. Back then, Democrats were the Conservatives.
Secondly, you're the ones who are trying to erase history by pretending the flag represents some bullshit heritage thing. Your own dude on this thread, Wolverine, said the flag represented slavery. By saying it represents something else now,
that is precisely erasing history.
So again, I must ask; why are you so adamant that we erase history?
I'm saying that there are plenty of Confederate era monuments and memorabilia that can be archived for all of society to see and learn about.
What is learned from them? That's the question none of you have been able to answer. The design of the flag teaches what? The monuments teach what?
What is learned from those that can't be learned from reading the Articles of Secession?
It's not about glorification -- it's about understanding why the Civil War happened and what the repercussions were.
So explain how the design of the Confederate flag helps people understand what they were fighting for? Explain how monuments that glorify those traitors help people understand what they were fighting for? Because on some of those monuments, they say that they were fighting to preserve white supremacy.
Why do the Articles of Secession not teach you why the war happened?
And how do the monuments serve what the "repercussions" are?
Face it, you just like having those things because you feel insecure in your own shitty inherent racism, and don't want to admit it.
So you erase history and pretend those things represent something else,
when one of your own idiotic allies said plainly they represent slavery.
By pretending the flag and monuments represent something else, you are erasing history.
So you are accusing us of doing the thing you are actually doing.
Well done, dumbass.