And you think they are in exactly the same condition as when they had an empire? Because they aren't.
There odds of having their heart cut out are significantly lower.
Oh, and they have the wheel...
And you think they are in exactly the same condition as when they had an empire? Because they aren't.
it is not possible to measure global sea level. There is no valid reference point.
JFK is 12 ft ASL. It has been 12 ft ASL since it was built in 1948.
BFI is 13 ft ASL. It has been 13 ft ASL since it was built in 1928.
Shipyards that built ships in 1880 are still there and they are still operating.
Is the equator desert?
Yeah, but the shysters and frauds are lining their pockets with our money....
There odds of having their heart cut out are significantly lower.
Oh, and they have the wheel...
Like you know anything about this.
LOL. The fact that you don't see that you just gutted your own position is actually kind of entertaining. I'll let you puzzle out what howler you just made.
No one says there is a correct temperature. The key is "change".
Ohh, show us a GRAPH!
Graphs to AGW cultists are like speaking in tongues to Pentecostals..
ROFL
But your church says that we are at the wrong temperature. How can there be a "wrong" temperature if there is no "right" temperature?
I liked the irony of no wheel. But the fields for the ball game they played has these nice circular "wheel-like" things. I can only imagine that they simply had no need for a wheel qua wheel.
Why is that?Most land areas at the equator are lush jungle.
Now you're learning.The largest desert in the world is at latitude 90 deg S (Antarctica, centered over the south pole).
Tarot is a rummy like game. Playing cards have been used to 'foretell' the future since there have been playing cards.It's not necessary to know the details of Tarot Cards to know they don't tell the future.
Quite right. It is the central God of the Church of Global Warming. This religion is used to justify implementing tyranny. It stems directly from the Church of Green, which in turn stems from the Church of Karl Marx.AGW is a fraud, has ALWAYS been a fraud, will always be a fraud.
Not possible. Climate has no value associated with it. There is nothing that can 'change'. Weather changes, but climate never can because there is nothing that can 'change'.I'll let you in on a secret your shamans and voodoo priests of the church of global warming and immaculate climate change will never tell you: In the 4.7 billion years that planet earth has existed - there is only one constant to the climate.
Change.
They do. They use a bogus 'calculation' to say Earth is 33 deg F hotter than it 'should be'.Why can your priests never tell you what the "correct" temperature range should be?
So you discard the 1st law of thermodynamics. Gotit.Wrong.
No, it doesn't. Energy can change in any given system according to this equation.It states that the total energy of the system remains constant.
Yes there is.There is no "time" component.
Heat is not energy. Work is not 'done' by any system.It basically says that the change in energy of the system is the difference between the heat added to the system and the work done by the system.
Semantics fallacy.(ALSO: normal designations put U as the energy of the system and "W" as work.
Heat is not energy.Oh yeah and "Q" is the heat added.
Nope. The 2nd law of thermodynamics applies to ALL systems, open or closed. So does the 1st law of thermodynamics. The Earth is a closed system. The Sun-Earth-space is another closed system. They are not the same system, even though you try to make them equivalent. The entire known universe is a closed system as well.Wrong again. You forgot the MAIN CAVEAT about this law that makes it special. It only applies to a closed system.
Nope. These are the laws of thermodynamics. You just want to ignore them.And you got them both astoundingly wrong.
He knows a hell of a lot more than you. You openly discard the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. At least he senses that there is something fundamentally wrong with your religion.Like you know anything about this.
He is not you.LOL. The fact that you don't see that you just gutted your own position is actually kind of entertaining. I'll let you puzzle out what howler you just made.
Lie.No one says there is a correct temperature.
Base rate fallacy. You cannot describe any 'change' without at least two absolute measurements. it is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. It is not possible to measure the global atmospheric concentration of CO2. It is not possible to measure the total snow and ice on Earth. It is not possible to measure the global sea level. It is not possible to measure the global pH or the temperature of the oceans.The key is "change".
Certainly a nice change to their society!There odds of having their heart cut out are significantly lower.
Don't know anyone that doesn't!Oh, and they have the wheel...
Except graphs actually make sense. I understand if you have no science background that you might be confused by them. They do require at least a junior high school education.
See? The fact that you think this indicates you aren't very well versed on the topic.
Cool, show that the Mayans, or Aztecs for that matter - EVER had wheeled carts or devices?
No?
Damn...
Why is that?
Now you're learning.
Hey genius, how did the equation presented by Into the Night allow for creation or destruction of energy? You don't understand any of the science you believe you "learned" from your three-minute perusal of Wikiedia so you aren't going to be able to give me any sort of answer, but suffice to say that you are wrong.Wrong. It states that the total energy of the system remains constant.
We'll just chalk this up to you being a scientifically illiterate moron. Of course there is a "passage of time" element to the first law. The amount of energy remains constant over time, despite its changing form over time. It would be stupid to claim that an amount of energy equals itself at any given moment.There is no "time" component.
Nope. The amount of work accomplished is the difference between the initial amount of usable energy and the final amount of usable energy.It basically says that the change in energy of the system is the difference between the heat added to the system and the work done by the system.
You blew it here. In science and math, there is no "normal". There is only the speaker, who gets to choose however he wants to express the concept. You (the audience) are free to convert the symbology any way you want, i.e. you are not required to adhere to anything that anyone declares is "normal" either.(ALSO: normal designations put U as the energy of the system and "W" as work. Oh yeah and "Q" is the heat added.
He's not wrong for omitting that common assumption. All you're doing is telling everyone that you rushed to Wikipedia for guidance on what to say. Your mistaken belief that Wikipedia is somehow inerrant and is the authority on all things is reflected in your "the normal way" comment above. You could have just posted that you are a babbling, uneducated idiot and it would have been much easier and taken a lot less time.Wrong again. You forgot the MAIN CAVEAT about this law that makes it special. It only applies to a closed system.
I liked the irony of no wheel. But the fields for the ball game they played has these nice circular "wheel-like" things. I can only imagine that they simply had no need for a wheel qua wheel.
Or more factually, just never figured it out.
But one cannot expect a leftist to grasp the difference between a circle and a wheel...
Except graphs actually make sense.
I understand if you have no science background that you might be confused by them.
They do require at least a junior high school education.
See? The fact that you think this indicates you aren't very well versed on the topic.