Creationist child abusers close doors

not at all.....it came up originally because someone claimed there wouldn't have been room on the ark for all the animals they would have needed to bring......I merely pointed out they wouldn't have needed all 37,000 varieties of beetle and the discussion has continued from there....

No, you mentioned felines.

It's just you cherry picking and rewriting the Bible and other sources to confirm your bias.
 
He is goofy, all were killed, but then he tries to say it was a local occurrence? I don't know how you can claim both! This is his way of arguing and it is funny to read.

lol....you quote Baxter to prove what I said?.....can I quote SF sometime to prove what you've said?.....
 
I have only ever approached these discussions for the purpose of getting folks to realize their assumptions are only assumptions......I could care less what Baxter believes as long as he recognizes it IS a belief and not a proven scientific fact.......

Evolution and common descent are proven facts and you need to deal with that. It's too bad if it does not fit your Bible.

You will claim in one instance that you agree but then in another that you don't by attempting to redefine words like macroevolution and inventing others like "kind."
 
you may believe your ancestors were mold but it is hardly a proven fact.....(though I admit I see a family resemblance to Swiss cheese).......
 
you would have to ask a Mormon about that.....it's not what anyone I have ever heard states......certainly it is not the understanding of Christianity that he is a physical being and you can continue to pretend that so long as you don't expect anyone to agree with you.....

The majority of Christian, and Jesus believe he was spirit, living spirit. It is you that has some weird philosophy about the Bible god not being alive.
 
only if you think the relevance of the story lies in how many animals were on the ark instead of in the disobedience and punishment of humanity.....

The story included more than that.

But fine, quit using it in the context of science. Keep it in your morality tales and quit trying to tell us that the bullshit on that quiz was accurate because your "poetry" says so.
 
The majority of Christian, and Jesus believe he was spirit, living spirit. It is you that has some weird philosophy about the Bible god not being alive.

I also believe he is a spirit....as I have said before, we say things like he lives in our heart......that does not mean we think he is a tiny little man in our left ventricle........he is not a living creature with a heart and lungs and acids digesting food in his stomach......
 
The story included more than that.

But fine, quit using it in the context of science. Keep it in your morality tales and quit trying to tell us that the bullshit on that quiz was accurate because your "poetry" says so.

lol.....tell me where I said anything about anything being "accurate"?......
 
I also believe he is a spirit....as I have said before, we say things like he lives in our heart......that does not mean we think he is a tiny little man in our left ventricle........he is not a living creature with a heart and lungs and acids digesting food in his stomach......

Lo, you better go back and read the thread, you are ridiculous.
 
the purpose of ALL your "atheist's panties in a wad" threads is to call Christians a pile of shit.....you started another one today.....(excluded me from it too, I see)......

The purpose is to stop creationist from attempting to brainwash kids and attack science. We need science education. When I post stories on the anti-vaxers, many of them left wing idiots, or GM fear mongering, it's the same.

Fuck your religion. Science is not about attacking your religion. You just have delusions of persecution and so you think that anytime someone talks about something that might challenge one of you fairy tales that they are attacking you. Your religion only becomes the issues when you make it so, like the creationists are doing in Ohio.

You were excluded because otherwise you might feel it was about you and troll the thread again until you made it so.
 
is replanting the earth that big a deal to a guy who created time?........the Horsehead Nebula?.......created DNA in the first place?.....if you don't believe Genesis 1:1 would a more detailed Genesis 7 do the trick for you?......

No, I would not believe it. But your explanation does not fit where mine does. The supposed major acts of creation, destruction and salvation were explained for the audience. The audience and story tellers were ignorant and so they did not understand the problems. But I don't believe they ever really expected it to be understood as a historical event either.
 
I also mentioned canines.....want me to mention lizards too?......I can do that......

It's a huge difference. Beetles and other species with rapid overturn in their generations evolve faster. Your argument was nonsense and still is. Yet while you claim you don't really believe it you are still trying to argue it. You are a troll.
 
Back
Top