Creationist child abusers close doors

I agree.....if you stuck with science instead of attacking Christianity we would have very little to argue about....


the purpose of ALL your "atheist's panties in a wad" threads....

Bullshit. Every time a topic is raised that indirectly contradicts one of your fairy tales you whine about it.

Fuck your religion, as in I don't care about it. It's not relevant to me. Believe whatever you want, just don't attack the furtherance of scientific understanding.
 
The audience and story tellers were ignorant and so they did not understand the problems.

actually they were uncannily accurate in that ignorance.....

what was the first thing created......the automatic response is light, raising the difficult question of where the light came from if the sun had not yet been created......but....
And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.

he didn't create "light".....he created "day" and "night"......measured transition understandable by nomads.....he didn't create light, he created time....

what did he create next.....
6 And God said, “Let there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water.” 7 So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the vault “sky.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the second day.
did he create "space"?......a place wherein he could separate "the waters from the waters"?....

next....
9 And God said, “Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear.” And it was so. 10 God called the dry ground “land,” and the gathered waters he called “seas.” And God saw that it was good......creation of matter?.....

then he goes on to create the stars, the planets and ever more complex life forms ending with man......

not too shabby for ignorant nomads....
 
Bullshit. Every time a topic is raised that indirectly contradicts one of your fairy tales you whine about it.

Fuck your religion, as in I don't care about it. It's not relevant to me. Believe whatever you want, just don't attack the furtherance of scientific understanding.

/shrugs....fuck your scientific understanding.....or should I say misunderstanding.....
 
actually they were uncannily accurate in that ignorance.....

what was the first thing created......the automatic response is light, raising the difficult question of where the light came from if the sun had not yet been created......but....
And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.

he didn't create "light".....he created "day" and "night"......measured transition understandable by nomads.....he didn't create light, he created time....

what did he create next.....
6 And God said, “Let there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water.” 7 So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the vault “sky.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the second day.
did he create "space"?......a place wherein he could separate "the waters from the waters"?....

next....
9 And God said, “Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear.” And it was so. 10 God called the dry ground “land,” and the gathered waters he called “seas.” And God saw that it was good......creation of matter?.....

then he goes on to create the stars, the planets and ever more complex life forms ending with man......

not too shabby for ignorant nomads....

No, it was obvious, lol, even to people from the Bronze Age.
 
actually they were uncannily accurate in that ignorance.....

what was the first thing created......the automatic response is light, raising the difficult question of where the light came from if the sun had not yet been created......but....
And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.

he didn't create "light".....he created "day" and "night"......measured transition understandable by nomads.....he didn't create light, he created time....

what did he create next.....
6 And God said, “Let there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water.” 7 So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the vault “sky.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the second day.
did he create "space"?......a place wherein he could separate "the waters from the waters"?....

next....
9 And God said, “Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear.” And it was so. 10 God called the dry ground “land,” and the gathered waters he called “seas.” And God saw that it was good......creation of matter?.....

then he goes on to create the stars, the planets and ever more complex life forms ending with man......

not too shabby for ignorant nomads....

Oh now it is uncannily accurate? You said it was not historically accurate.

LOL, It's accurate about what? When the flood happened? Where? How? Whether all animals were taken or not?

The cosmology in the Bible is all wrong. Are you going to argue geocentrism for us now?
 
your beliefs about evolution?......certainly not.....unless intelligent design is taught on an equal basis....

No, dumbass. The stupid creationist stuff on that test.

The SCIENTIFIC FACT of evolution will continue to be taught and your thoroughly debunked and abandoned intelligent design wedge will not.
 
No, dumbass. The stupid creationist stuff on that test.

I haven't asked anyone to teach the stuff on the test......however, I would object to any science class teaching the equally stupid stuff you've argued in this thread......some idiot might grow up believing its science......oh wait....that was you, wasn't it.....
 
Back
Top