Cyndi Lauper Says 'Our Families Are Validated' as Biden Signs Marriage Act

T. A. Gardner said:
Biden signs a bill that codifies something that's been law for over two decades and a minor celebrity applauds it? How meaningless was this whole exercise?
Click to expand...

Hasn’t been law on a national level, and it wasn’t protected by Congressional legislation but rather by legal decisions and precedent, which with this Court, means little, no matter how established

And I agree with you that Lauper is a classic jerk
 
evince said:
And you have a right to hate everyone


But not the power to destroy peoples lives


Loser
Click to expand...

But that is the mistake that many make. Just because I call something (behavior) wrong (depraved) doesn't mean that I hate them. Just because I don't want it to be held up as the "ideal" of how things are to be doesn't mean that I hate the people involved. I have a brother who was married, divorced and is now remarried for reasons other than adultery. He is in a depraved relationship as well. I don't hate him, but I don't hold him up to my kid as an example of how to be nor do I applaud his ability to engage in an adulterous relationship without repercussions in the US.

Desh, you have been here long enough to know that I have always been on board with civil unions in this country, though not calling it "marriage." I do not see that as a position of hate.
 
leaningright said:
But that is the mistake that many make. Just because I call something (behavior) wrong (depraved) doesn't mean that I hate them. Just because I don't want it to be held up as the "ideal" of how things are to be doesn't mean that I hate the people involved. I have a brother who was married, divorced and is now remarried for reasons other than adultery. He is in a depraved relationship as well. I don't hate him, but I don't hold him up to my kid as an example of how to be nor do I applaud his ability to engage in an adulterous relationship without repercussions in the US.

Desh, you have been here long enough to know that I have always been on board with civil unions in this country, though not calling it "marriage." I do not see that as a position of hate.
Click to expand...

I don’t memorize your posts dude


What you promote is hate of people your fucked up religious belief creates



Jesus didn’t suggest helping people murder gay people by claiming they are Unclean and molest children


You just absolving yourself of the repercussions of what you do is meaningless to the actual effects of your actions


Wake up evil spreader
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Why are all the White Nationalists opposed to this, Terry?

Do you prepare your own food or is it prepared for you? I'm curious.
Click to expand...

I'm not "opposed" to it. I'm pointing out its irrelevance. It's nothing but an empty feel-good measure of the sort the Left often pulls to appear to be doing something when they are really doing nothing.
 
evince said:
I don’t memorize your posts dude
Click to expand...

I could say something about your cognitive abilities right about now ... but I won't.

What you promote is hate of people your @#$%$##$@ religious belief creates
Click to expand...

You're wrong.

Jesus didn’t suggest helping people murder gay people by claiming they are Unclean and molest children
Click to expand...

Neither have I ... ever suggested such a thing.

You just absolving yourself of the repercussions of what you do is meaningless to the actual effects of your actions


Wake up evil spreader
Click to expand...

Whatever....:rolleyes:
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It doesn't "upset me." It makes me wonder just how fucking stupid the people running things actually are because they have to be stupider than me by a huge margin to think I'd swallow their codifying something into law that was already long codified into law as significant.
Click to expand...
Like Roe vs Wade? Wasn’t that thought to be law?
 
leaningright said:
I could say something about your cognitive abilities right about now ... but I won't.



You're wrong.



Neither have I ... ever suggested such a thing.



Whatever....:rolleyes:
Click to expand...




You can’t spew idiot loser hate and then just claim it’s not hate



Life doesn’t work like that loser
 
floridafan said:
Right handjob, we saw what happened to Roe V Wade.
Click to expand...

Roe v. Wade was made up out of thin air by the Supreme Court. It is a state issue in any case. There is no need--NONE WHATSOEVER--for a federal law on abortion. Gay marriage... And I might point out that it was originally put on the ballot in 35 states including California where the LGBTPDQRSTUV activists lost all 35 times. They then resorted to the courts to force it on the public without any popular support at the time...

Anyway, gay marriage is an issue the federal government has some interest in. If you are married in state A your marriage should be valid in state B. You can't have differing rules on marriage because it has an interstate component built into it. Abortion doesn't. You get one, or can't where you are at the time it occurs. Getting an abortion in state A has no impact on state B's laws on abortion no matter how different the two may be.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Roe v. Wade was made up out of thin air by the Supreme Court. It is a state issue in any case. There is no need--NONE WHATSOEVER--for a federal law on abortion. Gay marriage... And I might point out that it was originally put on the ballot in 35 states including California where the LGBTPDQRSTUV activists lost all 35 times. They then resorted to the courts to force it on the public without any popular support at the time...

Anyway, gay marriage is an issue the federal government has some interest in. If you are married in state A your marriage should be valid in state B. You can't have differing rules on marriage because it has an interstate component built into it. Abortion doesn't. You get one, or can't where you are at the time it occurs. Getting an abortion in state A has no impact on state B's laws on abortion no matter how different the two may be.
Click to expand...

Its done and over with my dear, and all the more important since noted liberal Clarence Thomas, so recently suggested that the SC should examine the legality issue of gay marriage.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Biden signs a bill that codifies something that's been law for over two decades and a minor celebrity applauds it? How meaningless was this whole exercise?
Click to expand...

Wake up! Anyone there?

Justice Thomas leaked out that he was going to vote to leave gay marriage up to the states because he had a legal power grab- the lack of a federal law!

Well, a Bipartisan Congress, House, and President said- WELL, WE CAN FIX THIS SO THAT THOMAS CAN'T INFLUENCE THE COURTS WITH HIS BIGOTRY- AND THEY DID IT THE LEGAL AND OLD FASHIONED WAY- THROUGH THE LEGISLATION BRANCH! :laugh:

TRY GOVERNMENT 101- I think you'll find it very educating!
 
Last edited:
evince said:
I don’t memorize your posts dude


What you promote is hate of people your fucked up religious belief creates



Jesus didn’t suggest helping people murder gay people by claiming they are Unclean and molest children


You just absolving yourself of the repercussions of what you do is meaningless to the actual effects of your actions


Wake up evil spreader
Click to expand...
Do we really live in a country where you can’t freely support whoever or whatever you want? Why should he hide from his opinion ? You shouldn’t ask that he does or rage out on him in response... (thanks Mike.....RIP)

RIP 🇺🇸
 
leaningright said:
But that is the mistake that many make. Just because I call something (behavior) wrong (depraved) doesn't mean that I hate them. Just because I don't want it to be held up as the "ideal" of how things are to be doesn't mean that I hate the people involved. I have a brother who was married, divorced and is now remarried for reasons other than adultery. He is in a depraved relationship as well. I don't hate him, but I don't hold him up to my kid as an example of how to be nor do I applaud his ability to engage in an adulterous relationship without repercussions in the US.

Desh, you have been here long enough to know that I have always been on board with civil unions in this country, though not calling it "marriage." I do not see that as a position of hate.
Click to expand...

So you don't mind them getting married?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It doesn't "upset me." It makes me wonder just how fucking stupid the people running things actually are because they have to be stupider than me by a huge margin to think I'd swallow their codifying something into law that was already long codified into law as significant.
Click to expand...

Be honest, it won't hurt. the fact is Repubs were talking about changing that. Clarence the cross-eyed Supreme talked about looking for cases to overthrow it. It was under fire from the right. That is why he did it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top