apnews.com
Completely irrelevant to the point of the thread; you're trolling your own thread.
www.nbcnews.com
Infant mortality rate rose 8% in wake of Texas abortion ban, study shows
Infant mortality rate rose 8% in wake of Texas abortion ban, study shows
A new study shows the infant death rate in Texas went up in the wake of the state's abortion ban. The analysis published Monday out of Johns Hopkins University is the latest research to find higher infant mortality rates in states with abortion restrictions.
Look what you have done..
But multiple obstetrician-gynecologists who focus on high-risk pregnancies told CNN that Texas’ strict abortion laws likely contributed to the uptick in infant deaths.
Yeah what do the obgyn's know about infant mortality!
The fact that overturning dobbs has increased baby deaths is making you upset. Good it should. You have made the problem worse. Good going.
Abortion doesn't kill "babies".
awe digging graves for all the dead babies you caused by overturning Dobbs?
Raw Story??? Seriously????
'Decision will be overturned': Law experts predict immunity ruling will not survive
Harvard constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe expects the U.S. Supreme Court will likely overturn its own decision in Donald Trump's case.Legal analysts lined up to denounce the court's decision Monday that gives Donald Trump immunity for actions taking in his official capacity as...www.rawstory.com
Harvard constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe expects the U.S. Supreme Court will likely overturn its own decision in Donald Trump's case.
Legal analysts lined up to denounce the court's decision Monday that gives Donald Trump immunity for actions taking in his official capacity as president. But in reading lawyer Robert B. Hubbell, Tribe quoted that the ruling is “destined to be remembered as a mark of shame for the Roberts Court just as Dred Scott tarnishes Chief Justice Taney’s legacy to this day.”
Hubbell, one of the top-rated Securities Litigation attorneys in Los Angeles, wrote that the constitutional theory is that all presidents were "subject to impeachment for actions immune from prosecution."
Neither legal expert believes that the decision will remain in place for generations the way most landmark cases stand.
"Trump v. United States will be overruled. The decision is so bad it will not stand," wrote Hubbell. "Like Dred Scott (holding that enslaved people are not citizens entitled to judicial protections), Plessy v. Ferguson (upholding segregation), Koramatsu v US (upholding the Japanese internment camps), today’s decision will be overturned by the acclamation of history in due course."
www.allsides.com
law experts are quoted try againRaw Story??? Seriously????
Sources with an AllSides Media Bias Rating of Left display media bias in ways that strongly align with liberal, progressive, or left-wing thought and/or policy agendas. This is our most liberal rating on the political spectrum.
Raw Story Media Bias Rating
Learn the AllSides Media Bias Rating of Raw Story. AllSides rates the media bias of hundreds of news outlets, media sources and writers.
How about quoting from a non garbage source next time?
Apparently, law professors who support the autocratic Democratic Party like looking stupid and being wrong most of the time. Sad, but they can't help themselves.'Decision will be overturned': Law experts predict immunity ruling will not survive
Harvard constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe expects the U.S. Supreme Court will likely overturn its own decision in Donald Trump's case.Legal analysts lined up to denounce the court's decision Monday that gives Donald Trump immunity for actions taking in his official capacity as...
Harvard constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe expects the U.S. Supreme Court will likely overturn its own decision in Donald Trump's case.
Legal analysts lined up to denounce the court's decision Monday that gives Donald Trump immunity for actions taking in his official capacity as president. But in reading lawyer Robert B. Hubbell, Tribe quoted that the ruling is “destined to be remembered as a mark of shame for the Roberts Court just as Dred Scott tarnishes Chief Justice Taney’s legacy to this day.”
Hubbell, one of the top-rated Securities Litigation attorneys in Los Angeles, wrote that the constitutional theory is that all presidents were "subject to impeachment for actions immune from prosecution."
Neither legal expert believes that the decision will remain in place for generations the way most landmark cases stand.
"Trump v. United States will be overruled. The decision is so bad it will not stand," wrote Hubbell. "Like Dred Scott (holding that enslaved people are not citizens entitled to judicial protections), Plessy v. Ferguson (upholding segregation), Koramatsu v US (upholding the Japanese internment camps), today’s decision will be overturned by the acclamation of history in due course."
I know they are wrong and should be embarrassed saying such stupid nonsense. It won't be overturned unless Fascists on the left take over everything, which they can't seem to do anyway.
Still not a majority. Why do you think the court should be partisan? Be specific.
The cases where he was found guilty on 34 counts and liable for sexual assault and defamation? So they were correct.Apparently, law professors who support the autocratic Democratic Party like looking stupid and being wrong most of the time. Sad, but they can't help themselves.
Probably some of the same morons who suggested that the cases against Trump were sound legal theories.