Matt Dillon
Semolina comes from wheat
See Matt? There it is! I called it. He put me on ignore after I found him out.
Legion posts are never quite as on point as Arminius's.
Democrats lied about elections, encouraged terrorism, stormed capitals
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
Legion posts are never quite as on point as Arminius's.
Yes, complete energy independence was TRUMP rotting the system. Ending the border anarchy and "refugee" insanity was TRUMP rotting the system. Finally putting a stop to the endless wars and creating unprecedented peace was TRUMP rotting the system.
Resident Biden was in office for half a century while everything was being made completely dysfunctional and rigged against the American people. Biden is the KING of rot, and you project his signature trait onto Trump...while accusing those CONFRONTING the rot...of projection?
New idiot hypocrisy level achieved.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Are you trying to be funny? If so, you have succeed.
Notice how in seven pages of slander, vitriol, and crying, not one Democrat asked to SEE the evidence of Election Theft 2020? 
THAT is how concerned they are with the truth.
Guess that explains why so many of them said in polls that even THEY knew Biden stole the presidency.
Guess I'll come back tomorrow and see if any of them mustered up the honesty or courage to do anything other than hurl impotent insults.
THAT is how concerned they are with the truth.
Guess that explains why so many of them said in polls that even THEY knew Biden stole the presidency.
Guess I'll come back tomorrow and see if any of them mustered up the honesty or courage to do anything other than hurl impotent insults.
Matt Dillon
Semolina comes from wheat
Matt Dillon
Semolina comes from wheat
That's from Scrubs, huh?
That's a show with writing as good as it gets.
One of the very few that I can watch every episode of over and over in a week-long binge.
no worries
Verified User
This is an ad nauseum fallacy.
Repeating your already debunked lie doesn't make it less debunked.
Again, the MOUNTAINS of unassailable proof being refused on the technicality of standing, without even reviewing said evidence, in no way constitutes said evidence not existing. It has all been gathered, submitted, and ignored...so that unthinking partisan hacks like yourself can talk past all the evidence to demand the evidence, like it hasn't already been provided, like a dumb-ass.
View attachment 19356
Try to keep up.
Yeah, you might want to try.
IF my comment was already debunked, WTF is Joe Biden doing in the White House?
What "evidence' has already been provided?
In court?
Well your "evidence" is 1 for 60?
Not very compelling.
Courts, it's where evidence thrives and BS dies.
Just because I SAY my neighbors dog, shit in my yard doesn't make it so.
Dotard lost the popular vote twice, by 3 million in 2016 and by 7 million on 2020.
There's the election fraud.
no worries
Verified User
Apparently better than you do.
Do you?
You mean the part that got immediately shut down over imaginary issues with standing? Yeah, I'm aware. Comprehend the irrelevance of this yet?
Wow. How embarrassingly ignorant of basic facts. No. Let me break out the crayons for you. Not having standing means that you weren't the person violated and that it needs to therefore be someone else who brings the case. It implies nothing whatsoever about the validity of the evidence.
You just about done discrediting yourself today or would you like to keep going?
Yeah, keep embarrassing yourself.
"Let me break out the crayons for you".
In law, standing or locus standi is the ability of a party to demonstrate to the court sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged to support that party's participation in the case. Standing exists from one of three causes:
The party is directly subject to an adverse effect by the statute or action in question, and the harm suffered will continue unless the court grants relief in the form of damages or a finding that the law either does not apply to the party or that the law is void or can be nullified. This is called the "something to lose" doctrine, in which the party has standing because they will be directly harmed by the conditions for which they are asking the court for relief.
The party is not directly harmed by the conditions by which they are petitioning the court for relief but asks for it because the harm involved has some reasonable relation to their situation, and the continued existence of the harm may affect others who might not be able to ask a court for relief. In the United States, this is the grounds for asking for a law to be struck down as violating the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, because while the plaintiff might not be directly affected, the law might so adversely affect others that one might never know what was not done or created by those who fear they would become subject to the law. This is known as the "chilling effects" doctrine.
The party is granted automatic standing by act of law.
Under some environmental laws in the United States, a party may sue someone causing pollution to certain waterways without a federal permit, even if the party suing is not harmed by the pollution being generated. The law allows the plaintiff to receive attorney's fees if they substantially prevail in the action. In some U.S. states, a person who believes a book, film or other work of art is obscene may sue in their own name to have the work banned directly without having to ask a District Attorney to do so.
In the United States, the current doctrine is that a person cannot bring a suit challenging the constitutionality of a law unless they can demonstrate that they are or will "imminently" be harmed by the law.
Dotard, crazy eyes and the loony woman, claimed Dotard was harmed by election laws,(losing the election) otherwise they wouldn't have appealed to multiple states attorneys to challenge that states election laws, Texas did the same thing.
But they couldn't prove it.
Where do you prove it, just a smidgen of proof? The opening statement.
Otherwise, the court will rule that the plaintiff "lacks standing" to bring the suit, and will dismiss the case without considering the merits of the claim of unconstitutionality.
In United States law, the Supreme Court has stated, "In essence the question of standing is whether the litigant is entitled to have the court decide the merits of the dispute or of particular issues."
Sooo, Dotard, crazy eyes and the loony woman failed to bring enough evidence in their opening arguments for the trial could even proceed, the courts were laughing as they threw cases out.
"Wow. How embarrassingly ignorant of basic facts".
Yup.
no worries
Verified User
"The majority of Republicans support President Trump".
"Republican support for Trump to play role in party up 18 points from early January".
Proves how stupid they are, supporting a lying, grifter from NYC.
"And yes, this right-of-center country, President Trump's base, was so electrified in support of him, because he took a CONSERVATIVE stance on almost everything".
"2) Free markets, limited government that lives within its means, and following the Constitution is only "loony" to Marxist loonies".
Teabaggers (www.teaparty.org.) CLAIM to be conservative, it's only a campaign slogan and utilized when democrats are in office as a means for obstructing everything.
"Notice how easily proven wrong everything you say is".
Not in the slightest.
May as well be listening to Rannity, Dotards son, on Dotard TV.
1) "Theft still isn't winning, no matter how many times you repeat it".
Winning isn't theft, no matter how many times you repeat it, 60 court cases proves that.
2) 'Telling your supporters to peacefully resist election theft is NOTHING LIKE the last four years of non-stop Democrat support for insurrection".
January 6 2021
Trump: “If You Don’t Fight Like Hell, You’re Not Going To Have A Country Anymore”.
Crazy eyes: 'So lets have trial by combat".
The rest is a repeat of Rannity, teabagger (www.teapaty.org) BS.
"Republican support for Trump to play role in party up 18 points from early January".
Proves how stupid they are, supporting a lying, grifter from NYC.
"And yes, this right-of-center country, President Trump's base, was so electrified in support of him, because he took a CONSERVATIVE stance on almost everything".
"2) Free markets, limited government that lives within its means, and following the Constitution is only "loony" to Marxist loonies".
Teabaggers (www.teaparty.org.) CLAIM to be conservative, it's only a campaign slogan and utilized when democrats are in office as a means for obstructing everything.
"Notice how easily proven wrong everything you say is".
Not in the slightest.
May as well be listening to Rannity, Dotards son, on Dotard TV.
1) "Theft still isn't winning, no matter how many times you repeat it".
Winning isn't theft, no matter how many times you repeat it, 60 court cases proves that.
2) 'Telling your supporters to peacefully resist election theft is NOTHING LIKE the last four years of non-stop Democrat support for insurrection".
January 6 2021
Trump: “If You Don’t Fight Like Hell, You’re Not Going To Have A Country Anymore”.
Crazy eyes: 'So lets have trial by combat".
The rest is a repeat of Rannity, teabagger (www.teapaty.org) BS.
The "I know you are, but what am I" defense? What are you eight years old? [If so, have you been molested by Resident Biden yet?]
Behold, what passes for a serious counterpoint among Democrats.
Being an illegitimate usurper, what else?
And the dishonest fallacy you're relying on this time is the "if some judge doesn't agree with you, then the already proven cheating must not have happened" non-sequiter.
What "evidence' has already been provided?
Are you looking for evidence like the hundreds upon hundreds of affidavits sworn out under penalty of perjury by registered Republicans AND Democrats saying they personally witnessed Democrats feeding the same ballots into the machines over and over hundreds of times and filling dumpsters with military ballots?
Or more like the suitcases of fake ballots that were caught on video being wheeled into secure vote counting places while Republicans were not allowed in?
Or more like all the postal workers who signed sworn statements under penalty of perjury stating that they were instructed to fraudulently back-date truckloads of fake votes?
Or more like the literal mathematical impossibility of Biden losing minorities in droves, losing all the counties Obama gained, losing badly in Congress, while also somehow getting more votes than any person in human history (while hiding in his basement and never campaigning)...all at 3:00 in the morning when things shut down only in notorious Democrat-run voter fraud precincts...WHILE there were somehow 20 million more votes than voters?
Which kind of evidence would you like? There are so many kinds. You have to narrow it down to which plethora of proof you require.
Being a dishonest moron 101...
Step 1: Make no demands for proof.
Step 2: Condemn the lack of proof that you never demanded.
Unless it's never considered due to standing. Shall I break out the crayons and explain it a third time or can you grasp it this time around?
Say the only people who would ever need that explained.
You know, the same evidence-impaired gullible morons who fell for:
-the Trump demanded Georgia ballots hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax
Cheating still isn't winning, no matter how many times you repeat it. And how many votes do you think it costs a person to:
-be framed as a secret Russian agent for four years straight,
-be impeached for wanting to investigate Biden's already proven blackmail and bribery of Ukraine,
-have the news media bury massive bombshell scandals against your opponent,
-have Google ban all conservative sites for 90 days leading up to the election so no one can get multiple sides of the story,
-have social media ban everyone to the right of Karl Marx from getting to express opinions in public,
-and have illegal immigrants voting Democrat?
Just think, Biden had ALL THAT RIGGING on his side and STILL had to blatantly steal the presidency in broad daylight. THAT'S what a massive landslide defeat this was for him.
Is anything you say EVER accurate or honest?
Last edited:
no worries
Verified User
Any way that makes you look smarter or more mature than a 5th Grader?
The majority of Republicans support President Trump.
Republican support for Trump to play role in party up 18 points from early January
And yes, this right-of-center country, President Trump's base, was so electrified in support of him, because he took a CONSERVATIVE stance on almost everything.
-Ordered the removal of Obama policies that forced the suburbs to pay for the cities (+1).
-Reversed Obama’s payoffs to failed “green” companies (+1).
————————————————————————————
-Ordered Congressional reapportionment to only take into account the population of actual U.S. citizens, excluding illegal immigrants (+1).
-Ordered HHS to intervene to protect rights and liberties for Christians in health care (+1).
-Launched Operation Legend to combat Democrat-created crime in major cities (+1).
-Reversed dangerous Obama transgender policy that put battered women in shelters at risk (+1).
-Barred illegal immigrants from being counted in Congressional redistricting (+1).
-Added a payroll tax cut (+1).
-Brought back manufacturing jobs (the ones Obama said could never return) and lowered unemployment to 3.9%, until Democrats scaremongered us into gridlock over the sniffles (+1).
Trump-appointed judges drastically reduced foreign Third World asylum approvals (+1).
-Took aggressive and extensive early action against COVID, despite being relentlessly sabotaged by Democrat incompetence and dishonesty, impeachment hoaxes, and anti-science doomsday scaremongering (+1).
-Announced executive action against online censorship of conservatives (+1).
-Declared Antifa a domestic terrorist group (+1).
———————————————————————————–
-Executive Order combating human trafficking (+1).
-Increased sanctions on Iran (+1).
-Eliminated major terror-sponsor Solemani (+1).
-Announced the removal of U.S. from W.H.O. (+1).
-Repealed Obama’s racist preferential treatments for minorities in public schools (+1).
-Replaced NAFTA with an America-first trade deal, effectively making Mexico pay for the wall (+1).
-Secured more concessions and made more progress with North Korea than any president since the Armistice (+1).
-Reinstated travel bans from unstable terror states (+1).
-Successfully nominated Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court (+1).
-Increased the removal of criminal gang members by 36% (and an 83% increase in MS-13 gang members) (+1).
————————————————————————————-
-Doubled the number of counties aiding illegal immigrant deportations (+1).
-Ended Obama’s catch-and-release illegal immigration policy (+1).
-Restored enforcement of national security-related trade agreements (+1).
-Removed extreme red tape from infrastructure permit approval process (+1).
-Signed 15 bills into law cutting regulations on job-creators (+1).
-Withdrew the U.S. from the biased U.N. Human Rights Council (+1).
-Reversed Obama’s extremist response to the BP oil spill (+1).
-Cut off funding for the United Nations (+1).
-Stopped terminally ill patients from having to wait on FDA approval to try experimental life-saving drugs (+1).
-Ended taxpayer-funded subsidies for federal unions (+1).
————————————————————————————-
-Illegally banned bump stocks (-1).
-Signed into law a return to massive pork-barrel deficit spending (-1).
-Cut off funding to terror states like Pakistan (+1).
-Dramatically expanded offshore drilling (+1).
-Acknowledged Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel (+1).
-Resumed the prosecution of first-time border violating illegal immigrants, which had been suspended by Obama (+1).
-Reversed Obama’s policy of importing un-vetted Islamic “refugees” while denying refugee status to Christians being relentlessly persecuted throughout the Middle East (+1).
-Reversed Obama’s use of the Social Security system to deny American citizens gun rights on frivolous, intentionally broad and sweeping “mental health” grounds (+1).
-Reversed Obama’s illegal bathroom policy requiring schools to cater to gender delusions at the expense of public safety (+1).
-Refused to fill numerous federal posts that should not even exist under the Constitution (+1).
————————————————————————————–
-Repealed job-killing, unconstitutional Dodd-Frank regulations (+1).
-Stocked HHS with anti-abortion conservatives (+1).
-Reversed Obama decree that publicly funded abortions through Title X funding (+1).
-Signed the VA Choice and Quality Employment Act to protect veterans from government incompetence, corruption, neglect, and lack of access (+1).
-Cut off funding for sanctuary cities and increased ICE enforcement in those cities despite the actions of their lawless local governments (+1).
-Removed Obama’s ban on offshore drilling in the Arctic and Atlantic Ocean (+1).
-Stopped the funding of international organizations that promote abortion (+1).
-Loosened IRS restrictions on religious institutions (+1).
-Launched investigations into voter fraud (+1).
-Repaired our relations with Israel from the extreme hostility of the Obama years (+1).
————————————————————————————–
-Appointed nominees who reject the left’s Constitution-trampling interpretation of Title IX to push radical feminist gender hysteria (+1).
-Implemented a White House hotline, fully staffed by veterans, for veterans being harmed or neglected by the VA (+1).
-Implemented a tracking system through DHS to identify those staying in the U.S. on expired visas (+1).
-Signed the Veterans Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act to uproot VA corruption and incompetence (+1).
-Reversed Obama’s illegal land-grabbing assault on private property rights, known as the “Waters of the United States” rule (+1).
-Reversed Obama’s attempt to legitimize Cuba’s communist, terror-sponsoring regime (+1).
-Opened up massive amounts of job-creating trade with China (+1).
-Approved the Dakota Access Pipeline project (+1).
-Reversed our numerous losses in Iraq from Obama’s premature withdrawal and needless surrender of the entire region to Islamic terrorists (+1).
-Ended Obama’s policies arming Islamic jihadists in Syria (+1).
————————————————————————————–
-Reversed Obama’s obliteration of the coal industry via the “Stream Protection Rule” (+1).
-Authorized increased oil and natural gas development on federal lands (+1).
-Reversed Obama’s illegal Operation Choke Point assault on gun rights (+1).
-Reinstated successful work requirements for welfare policies that had been repealed by Obama (+1).
-Reversed Obama’s transgender military policy (+1).
-Increased deportations of illegal immigrants by more than 28% in his first year (+1).
-Ended the Central American Minors Parole Program that used children to import entire families Third World South American countries into the U.S. (+1).
-Introduced eight separate waves of numerous young, conservative federal judicial nominees (+1).
-Began re-funding the missile defenses dismantled by Obama (+1).
-Implemented measures to undo, delay or block 30 economy-killing Obama-era EPA policies, stripping down more regulations than ever in the agency’s entire history (+1).
————————————————————————————–
-Removed the U.S. from U.N. organizations that oppose our interests and those of our allies (+1).
-Reversed Obama’s appeasement of Iran (+1).
-Reversed Obamacare’s restrictions on purchasing health plans across state lines (+1).
-Ended the left’s corrupt practice of stacking “independent” review boards of the EPA with EPA-funded environmental extremists (+1).
-Directed the Department of Agriculture to immediately stop discriminating against Christians for disagreeing with homosexual marriage (+1).
-Reversed Obama’s illegal, economy-killing EPA takeover of energy production (+1).
-Reversed Obamacare’s illegal contraception mandate (+1).
-Sided with establishment RINO Luther Strange over proven conservative Roy Moore (-1).
-Helped Democrats raise the debt ceiling to further illegally nationalize hurricane relief (-1).
-Dramatically reduced regulations on manufacturers (+1).
————————————————————————————–
-Rescinded Obama’s illegal DACA program (+1).
-Repealed Obama’s absurd Executive Order forcing infrastructure projects to prioritize global warming (+1).
-Removed the U.S. from the Paris Climate Deal (+1).
-Repealed Obama’s racist preferential treatment for minorities in prosecuting criminals (+1).
-Repealed unscientific restrictions on fracking (+1).
-Reformed H-1B visa system to stop discriminating against Americans for profit (+1).
-Required Federal Government to prioritize hiring Americans (+1).
-Rolled back Obama-era gun controls (+1).
-Appointed religious liberty defender to important civil rights post (+1).
-Signed resolution overturning Obama’s forced state funding of Planned Parenthood (+1).
—————————————————————————————
-Stated his intention to fight the Freedom Caucus (conservatives) in 2018 (-1).
-Ended taxpayer funding for UN programs that support “coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization” (+1).
-Nominated an anti-environmentalist, anti-regulation, pro-religious freedom, pro-life, anti-judicial activism, Scalia-loving opponent of over-criminalization to the SCOTUS (+1).
-Implemented English-first policies (+1).
-Implemented “extreme vetting” of Islamic “refugees” (+1).
-Began rebuilding the military (+1).
-Implemented requirement for all new regulations to be accompanied by the removal of two other regulations (+1).
-Implemented 5-year ban on anyone from his administration taking lobbying jobs in Washington (what ACTUAL transparency and draining the swamp looks like) (+1).
-Sided with Ryancare over simply repealing Obama’s illegal health care takeover. (-1)
-Rescinded Obama’s lawless war on coal (+1).
——————————————————————————————-
-Reversed the Obamacare penalty for being too poor to afford insurance (+1).
-Reversed Obama’s attempt to restart the Democrat-created housing disaster that destroyed the economy in 2008 (no more forcibly lower lending standards for unqualified buyers) (+1).
-Reversed taxpayer funding for partisan liberal media (NPR and PBS) (+1).
-Reinstated Reagan’s ban on funding overseas abortion promoters and providers (+1).
-Pulled us out of TPP (+1).
-Imposed a federal hiring freeze on everything but the military (one of the few things the Federal Government is actually AUTHORIZED to spend money on under the Constitution) (+1).
-Restored the building of the Keystone pipeline (+1).
-Fired corrupt incompetents from the VA after years of inaction under Obama (+1).
-Froze EPA grant programs (+1).
-Reversed Obama’s sweeping EPA water power grab (+1) 2/28/16.
Notice how easily proven wrong everything you say is?
1) *loonies
2) Free markets, limited government that lives within its means, and following the Constitution is only "loony" to Marxist loonies.
"Hence teabaggers?"
Having the word "tea" in it REQUIRES you to turn it into some homophobic slur that you would be hyperventilating in fetal position in your little vagina hat if someone did to you?
Nice logic there, Socrates.
1) *defend, support (learn English, imbecile).
2) And yes, they support him, as any sane, thinking adult would.
View attachment 19353
View attachment 19354
Compare and contrast if you are able, low-IQ emotional hysteric.
1) Theft still isn't winning, no matter how many times you repeat it.
2) Telling your supporters to peacefully resist election theft is NOTHING LIKE the last four years of non-stop Democrat support for insurrection.
Yet Democrats are the only ones banning books, unilaterally enacting laws without Congress, breaking records with executive orders, threatening the news media, using soldiers and corporations to attack dissent, stealing elections, and surrounding themselves with walls and armies of sycophants.
Ridiculous propaganda from the same pathological liars who just had to admit their last fabricated Trump quote was an outright lie.
Remember the other obviously false, cartoonishly unrealistic Disney villain Trump "quote" you embarrassingly parroted on here without question, about him demanding that they find votes in Georgia (which is a hilarious thing to even bring up with the unprecedented avalanche of Democrat cheating that blasted this election from every possible direction)?
I guess your "news" sources left out the part about the media doing a 180 and admitting they “misquoted Trump’s comments on the call based on information provided by a source.”
But your "take my word for it" smear about Trump praising the communist dictator he's at war with...THAT one ISN'T a lie, right?
Ever heard of critical thinking?
Yet Democrats are the only ones banning books, unilaterally enacting laws without Congress, breaking records with executive orders, threatening the news media, using soldiers and corporations to attack dissent, stealing elections, and surrounding themselves with walls and armies of sycophants.
Well yeah, treason is a pretty serious crime there, brainiac.
Did you forget the last four years of treasonous Democrat attempts to jail, impeach, persecute, and overthrow their opponents (committing actual, serious crimes in the process) before hurling this hilariously self-unaware smear, or are you just too intellectually impaired to notice the contradiction?
What else you got?
Behold, what we mean when we say Democrats are easily manipulated by obviously fake news and incapable of independent thought.
The "I know you are, but what am I" defense? What are you eight years old? [If so, have you been molested by Resident Biden yet?]
View attachment 19364
Behold, what passes for a serious counterpoint among Democrats.
Being an illegitimate usurper, what else?
And the dishonest fallacy you're relying on this time is the "if some judge doesn't agree with you, then the already proven cheating must not have happened" non-sequiter.
View attachment 19365
What "evidence' has already been provided?
Are you looking for evidence like the hundreds upon hundreds of affidavits sworn out under penalty of perjury by registered Republicans AND Democrats saying they personally witnessed Democrats feeding the same ballots into the machines over and over hundreds of times and filling dumpsters with military ballots?
Or more like the suitcases of fake ballots that were caught on video being wheeled into secure vote counting places while Republicans were not allowed in?
Or more like all the postal workers who signed sworn statements under penalty of perjury stating that they were instructed to fraudulently back-date truckloads of fake votes?
Or more like the literal mathematical impossibility of Biden losing minorities in droves, losing all the counties Obama gained, losing badly in Congress, while also somehow getting more votes than any person in human history (while hiding in his basement and never campaigning)...all at 3:00 in the morning when things shut down only in notorious Democrat-run voter fraud precincts...WHILE there were somehow 20 million more votes than voters?
Which kind of evidence would you like? There are so many kinds. You have to narrow it down to which plethora of proof you require.
Being a dishonest moron 101...
Step 1: Make no demands for proof.
Step 2: Condemn the lack of proof that you never demanded.
Unless it's never considered due to standing. Shall I break out the crayons and explain it a third time or can you grasp it this time around?
Say the only people who would ever need that explained.
You know, the same evidence-impaired gullible morons who fell for:
-the Trump demanded Georgia ballots hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax
Cheating still isn't winning, no matter how many times you repeat it. And how many votes do you think it costs a person to:
-be framed as a secret Russian agent for four years straight,
-be impeached for wanting to investigate Biden's already proven blackmail and bribery of Ukraine,
-have the news media bury massive bombshell scandals against your opponent,
-have Google ban all conservative sites for 90 days leading up to the election so no one can get multiple sides of the story,
-have social media ban everyone to the right of Karl Marx from getting to express opinions in public,
-and have illegal immigrants voting Democrat?
Just think, Biden had ALL THAT RIGGING on his side and STILL had to blatantly steal the presidency in broad daylight. THAT'S what a massive landslide defeat this was for him.
Is anything you say EVER accurate or honest?
More accurate and honest than ANY THING you have EVER posted.
You can't prove a word of it.
LIES on top of LIES, then you LIE about LYING.
Typical teabagger (www.teaparty.org)
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
While "Republican" is both a noun and an adjective [and now a vile obscenity], "Democrat" is only a noun. The applicable adjective is 'Democratic."
Your posts are ludicrous, but even stupidity can be expressed in actual English.
1) Covering your ears, closing your eyes, and screaming, "It's lies! All lies, I tell you!" over all the facts already presented in no way refutes what has been claimed. The proof is right there in front of you and you impotently and childishly choose blind denial.
Typical hate-filled Demagogue Party psycho. Learn how to debate and try again.
2) And again, Democrats are the only ones here with an established record of incessant pathological lying.
Hence:
-the Trump demanded Georgia ballots hoax
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax
Notice how Democrats spent four years straight lying about a sitting U.S. president being a secret Russian agent to erroneously de-legitimize an election, provoking four years straight of coast-to-coast Democrat domestic terrorism, sedition, secession, anarchy, arson, and murder...which Democrats praised every step of the way (they also praised the storming of capitals, and stormed the Capitol themselves) and encouraged more of by bailing the terrorists out of jail?
Big Tech censored none of them, stripped no one of their rights or turned anyone into second class citizens for that. There was no persecution of anyone who questioned elections or expressed Democrat opinions in public, even though they ACTUALLY lied about the election, ACTUALLY supported treasonous insurrection (years of it), and ACTUALLY supported attacking capitals. Yet "conservatives" doing anything like what they have done for YEARS (in response to President Trump calling on them to peacefully resist election theft) provokes a total 180 in the response.
Are we finally ready to start acknowledging that the only real privilege here is Democrat privilege?
Democrats turn blind eye to Antifa in rush to condemn right-wing riot at U.S. Capitol
All true.
Behold, the party of "diversity," "tolerance," and "civility" spewing blind, aimless partisan hatred at anyone who isn't exactly like them.
Except for the fact that they are anti-democracy in every conceivable way, hence the refusal of sane, thinking adults to ever refer to them as "democrat-IC."
Then you should have no problem refuting them.
Last edited:
gemini104104
Verified User
Notice how Democrats spent four years straight lying about a sitting U.S. president being a secret Russian agent to erroneously de-legitimize an election, provoking four years straight of coast-to-coast Democrat domestic terrorism, sedition, secession, anarchy, arson, and murder...which Democrats praised every step of the way (they also praised the storming of capitals, and stormed the Capitol themselves) and encouraged more of by bailing the terrorists out of jail?
Big Tech censored none of them, stripped no one of their rights or turned anyone into second class citizens for that. There was no persecution of anyone who questioned elections or expressed Democrat opinions in public, even though they ACTUALLY lied about the election, ACTUALLY supported treasonous insurrection (years of it), and ACTUALLY supported attacking capitals. Yet "conservatives" doing anything like what they have done for YEARS (in response to President Trump calling on them to peacefully resist election theft) provokes a total 180 in the response.
Are we finally ready to start acknowledging that the only real privilege here is Democrat privilege?
Democrats turn blind eye to Antifa in rush to condemn right-wing riot at U.S. Capitol
In your case, its a shame to be a fool one time but to be a Putin puppet and tRump ass kisser of a fool two times, with three times making more of a fool out of yourself seriously goes against the nature of having some type of intellectual competence. Now consider the facts versus your trolling fiction:
Prosecutors: There's ‘Clear, Overwhelming’ Evidence Trump Incited Insurrection
WASHINGTON - Impeachment prosecutors contended Thursday that there was “clear and overwhelming” evidence that former President Donald Trump incited insurrection by sending a mob of his supporters to the U.S. Capitol last month to confront lawmakers as they were certifying that he had lost the November election to Democrat Joe Biden.
In closing arguments, the lead impeachment manager, Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, told the 100 senators acting as jurors at Trump’s impeachment trial that they should use “common sense on what happened here.”
“It is a bedrock principle that no one can incite a riot” in the American democracy, Raskin said.
But he argued that Trump urged hundreds of his supporters to march to the Capitol on January 6 and then — when they stormed the building, smashed windows, ransacked offices and scuffled with police — “did nothing for at least two hours” to end the mayhem that left five people dead, including a Capitol Police officer.
“He betrayed us,” Raskin said of the former U.S. leader, whose four-year term ended January 20 as Biden was inaugurated as the country’s 46th president. “He incited a violent insurrection against our government. He must be convicted.”
Raskin and eight other impeachment managers, all Democrats in the House of Representatives, concluded their case after about 12 hours spread over two days of presenting arguments and evidence against Trump."
https://www.voanews.com/usa/us-poli...rwhelming-evidence-trump-incited-insurrection