Another devastatingly clever comeback.
Democrats lied about elections, encouraged terrorism, stormed capitals
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
Another devastatingly clever comeback.
no worries
Verified User
More aimless off-topic insults. Ad hominem fallacies are invalid logic.
Hint: Tantrums and name-calling are not refutation.
Try again.
They aren't?
Your orange, dear leader had his cult fooled with his name calling and tantrums.
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
fuckwit.
The one he's fooled is you.
no worries
Verified User
We aren't mentioning him. You can't stop. TDS. It's real. And you're infected.
no worries
Verified User
Really?
"Democrats lied about elections, encouraged terrorism, stormed capitals".
Teabaggers (www.teaparty.org) sure are..........................deflecting for Dotard.
1) Whataboutism fallacy.
2) A cult would be more like endlessly peddling a debunked Russian conspiracy theory while using anarchy, arson, and murder for four years straight to violently terrorize everyone out of their rights.
3) There is a difference between cleverly insulting someone while destroying their argument...and the Democrat debate strategy of offering literally nothing but off-topic personal attacks.
Try again.
Gullible, say the people who fell for:
-the Russia collusion hoax
-the "Trump told people to drink Lysol" hoax
-the Covington Catholic hoax
-the Charlottesville "very fine people" hoax
-the Roy Moore pedophile hoax
-the Kavanaugh rape gang hoax
-the "repealing Net Neutrality will destroy the Internet" hoax
-the Hydroxchloroquine hoax
-the Jussie Smollett hoax
-the "Investigating Biden's corruption is worse than Biden BEING corrupt" hoax
-the Ukraine transcript hoax
-the Duke Lacrosse team hoax
-the Trayvon Martin hoax
-the "uninsured crisis" hoax
-the multitude of college hate crime hoaxes
-the "deceptively edited video" Planned Parenthood hoax
-the "children in cages" hoax
-the Michael Cohen perjury/contacting the Russians hoaxes
-the SPLC "hate group" hoax
-the "Trump mocking people with disabilities" hoax
-the "you can keep your doctor" hoax
-the "immigrants are rapists, criminals, animals" hoax
-the Kavanaugh "white power symbol" hoax
-the "Trump asked Putin to hack the DNC" hoax
-the polar bear dying from climate change hoax
-the "Trump made it easier for the mentally ill to purchase guns" hoax
-the Scaramucci Russian bankers hoax
-the "Muslim ban" hoax
-the global warming "consensus" hoax
-the "Obama's scandal-free presidency" hoax
-the Trump Jr. WikiLeaks hoax
-the Iran nuclear appeasement hoax
-the "polls show Trump will lose" hoax
-the "Obamacare will never fund abortions or illegal immigrants" hoax
-the "Hillary exonerated" hoax
-the "white privilege" hoax
-the voter suppression hoax
-the "hands up don't shoot" hoax
-the "Trump called soldiers losers" hoax
-the "peaceful protesters" hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi eagle" hoax
-the "Trump ignored Russia putting bounties on U.S. soldiers" hoax
-the coronavirus hoax
-the "Trump used a Nazi red triangle" hoax
-the "Trump admitted to sexual assault" hoax
-the "penises cause climate change" hoax
-the "Trump denying passports to Latinos" hoax
-the "Mission Accomplished" hoax
gemini104104
Verified User
Notice how Democrats spent four years straight lying about a sitting U.S. president being a secret Russian agent to erroneously de-legitimize an election, provoking four years straight of coast-to-coast Democrat domestic terrorism, sedition, secession, anarchy, arson, and murder...which Democrats praised every step of the way (they also praised the storming of capitals, and stormed the Capitol themselves) and encouraged more of by bailing the terrorists out of jail?
Big Tech censored none of them, stripped no one of their rights or turned anyone into second class citizens for that. There was no persecution of anyone who questioned elections or expressed Democrat opinions in public, even though they ACTUALLY lied about the election, ACTUALLY supported treasonous insurrection (years of it), and ACTUALLY supported attacking capitals. Yet "conservatives" doing anything like what they have done for YEARS (in response to President Trump calling on them to peacefully resist election theft) provokes a total 180 in the response.
Are we finally ready to start acknowledging that the only real privilege here is Democrat privilege?
Democrats turn blind eye to Antifa in rush to condemn right-wing riot at U.S. Capitol
Actually shove this up your tRump kissing hide as it is what it is:
Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
The Russian government interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election with the goals of harming the campaign of Hillary Clinton, boosting the candidacy of Donald Trump, and increasing political and social discord in the United States. According to U.S. intelligence agencies, the operation — code named Project Lakhta[1] — was ordered directly by Russian President Vladimir Putin.[2] The Special Counsel's report, made public in April 2019, examined numerous contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian officials but concluded that there was insufficient evidence to bring any conspiracy or coordination charges against Trump or his associates.
The Internet Research Agency (IRA), based in Saint Petersburg, Russia and described as a troll farm, created thousands of social media accounts that purported to be Americans supporting radical political groups and planned or promoted events in support of Trump and against Clinton. They reached millions of social media users between 2013 and 2017. Fabricated articles and disinformation were spread from Russian government-controlled media, and promoted on social media. Additionally, computer hackers affiliated with the Russian military intelligence service (GRU) infiltrated information systems of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), and Clinton campaign officials, notably chairman John Podesta, and publicly released stolen files and emails through DCLeaks, Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks during the election campaign. Several individuals connected to Russia contacted various Trump campaign associates, offering business opportunities to the Trump Organization and proffering damaging information on Clinton. Russian government officials have denied involvement in any of the hacks or leaks."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections
Yes, this mentions Democrats, Captain Literacy, not President Trump. Shall we break out the crayons?
Congratulations. You posted the common knowledge part of the debate no one is talking about (with the standard left-wing Wikipedia spin of not mentioning, for instance, that the Russians were also trying to help Bernie Sanders, because the goal was to divide the country, which Democrat useful idiots like yourself executed masterfully for Putin).
Showing that Russia made a handful of Facebook posts in no way indicates that the election outcome was swayed (only a complete imbecile would even suspect that), let alone that President Trump was in on it.
Hi, I'm basic reasoning, have we met?
gemini104104
Verified User
Congratulations. You posted the common knowledge part of the debate no one is talking about (with the standard left-wing Wikipedia spin of not mentioning, for instance, that the Russians were also trying to help Bernie Sanders, because the goal was to divide the country, which Democrat useful idiots like yourself executed masterfully for Putin).
Showing that Russia made a handful of Facebook posts in no way indicates that the election outcome was swayed (only a complete imbecile would even suspect that), let alone that President Trump was in on it.
Hi, I'm basic reasoning, have we met?
When it comes to feeling the Bern or Sanders' attempt to burn America:
How Russia Is Trying To Boost Bernie Sanders' Campaign
It's 2016 all over again — at least from Russia's perspective.
Russia's state-sponsored messaging about Bernie Sanders' presidential campaign was more neutral in the fall.
But over the past six weeks, this coverage has shifted to mirror pro-Sanders talking points first used in the last presidential campaign, said Clint Watts of the Foreign Policy Research Institute, who has been monitoring Russian interference continuously.
"What's really come on strong just in the last 30 to 45 days are very similar narratives that we saw in 2016 about Sanders," Watts told NPR.
While Sanders has acknowledged on the campaign trail that he was briefed by the intelligence community about Russia's efforts to boost his campaign, he has been steadfastly opposed to that support, saying at a recent debate: "Hey, Mr. Putin, if I'm president of the United States, trust me, you're not going to interfere in any more American elections." Also how's about screwing the entire GQP that waged war on Democracy and incited insurrection, screwing tRump and after all that screw yourself, you uncivilized, worthless and deplorable excuse as human being.
https://www.npr.org/2020/03/05/812186614/how-russia-is-trying-to-boost-bernie-sanders-campaign
Considering you have a wiki problem, consider the following facts as a result of tRump being Putin's bitch and his ass kisser too!:
Senate report details Russia’s efforts to meddle in 2016, ties to Trump associates
Catch up on the developing stories making headlines.
A new bipartisan report released by a Senate panel Tuesday outlines perhaps the most detailed accounting to date of Russia’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 election while accusing the White House and others close to President Donald Trump of refusing to cooperate with an investigation into whether the president’s campaign simply benefited or sought to aid Russia’s efforts.
The nearly-1,000 page report from the Senate Intelligence Committee, its fifth and final examination of a years-long effort to probe Russian meddling in 2016, describes several episodes in which Trump and members of his campaign were keen to accept Russia’s help -- and in some instances goes further than even former special counsel Robert Mueller in detailing ties between the campaign and Russian individuals.
However, like Mueller’s report released last year, the Senate committee does not allege any criminal conspiracy between Trump or members of his campaign and Russia."
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sen...as-efforts-meddle-2016-ties/story?id=72444405
Last edited:
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
fuckwit.
China unleashes the WuFlu on the world and you're worried about Russia. Are you related to evince?
gemini104104
Verified User
What are you talking about?
no worries
Verified User
1) Whataboutism fallacy.
2) A cult would be more like endlessly peddling a debunked Russian conspiracy theory while using anarchy, arson, and murder for four years straight to violently terrorize everyone out of their rights.
3) There is a difference between cleverly insulting someone while destroying their argument...and the Democrat debate strategy of offering literally nothing but off-topic personal attacks.
Try again.
"Debunked"? By who? The lying, moron Barr?
A federal judge already said Barr was lying.
Nothing about Dotard is clever.