‘Dilbert’ dropped by The Post, other papers, after cartoonist’s racist rant

BidenPresident said:
Adams, 65, also blamed Black people for not “focusing on education” during the show and said, “I’m also really sick of seeing video after video of Black Americans beating up non-Black citizens.”
Click to expand...

I agree with Adams. I am also sick of seeing video after video of Black Americans beating up on non-Black Americans.
 
Into the Night said:
Fiction.
Click to expand...

Nope. It is a fact as has been proven by many papers dropping his cartoon. He was correct. The proof is there. But it does not enter the cave of your mind. He cannot come back. He recognized what a mistake he made. Among the few that cannot, is you.
Your bigotry makes you blind.
 
Nordberg said:
Nope. It is a fact as has been proven by many papers dropping his cartoon. He was correct. The proof is there. But it does not enter the cave of your mind. He cannot come back. He recognized what a mistake he made. Among the few that cannot, is you.
Your bigotry makes you blind.
Click to expand...

Yes. The irony is that Scott Adams knew what he did was wrong. He did not try to defend it.
 
Nordberg said:
Nope. It is a fact as has been proven by many papers dropping his cartoon. He was correct. The proof is there. But it does not enter the cave of your mind. He cannot come back. He recognized what a mistake he made. Among the few that cannot, is you.
Your bigotry makes you blind.
Click to expand...

YOUR bigotry. YOUR racism. Not mine. Telling someone is racist is NOT racism, dope.
 
Joy Reid continues to have a podium to say racist things though. lovely how this hypocrisy works for the left time and time again
 
NiftyNiblick said:
I am not a felon.
I have not avoided any of my family obligations.
I've never committed murder [on this continent] or rape anywhere, ever.

See, you don't need free will to operate properly.
If you're normal and not damaged, you will behave properly, with or without free will.

If you're damaged or somehow compromised genetically, then you'll engage in anti-social behavior.

Even with likely or almost certain CTE from boxing, I'm not a recidivist criminal, regardless of whether or not I have free will.

I believe that the concept of free will was developed to blame sick people for their deviant behavior,
this because there can be no guilt without this probably invented concept of free will,
and people are programmed to blame somebody else to maintain their self-esteem.
Click to expand...

To which you've stated a few times are due to your superior genes. I get it.

Like a well programmed robot, you believe if a person has good genes then they will act properly. Again, I get it.

Understood that you believe a person with bad or defective genes will act poorly. Due to the Free Will thing, I continue to disagree.

Why do you think brain damage automatically means criminal behavior? Do you attribute your superior genes to a lack of criminal behavior despite CTE?

On the contrary, Free Will is only a part of us. There are genes, there are circumstances, there are illnesses which narrow one's Free Will. You say there is no such thing and I'm saying there is, but there can be limitations for a variety of reasons. From what you've posted, neef, you sound like a blueblood racist with your beliefs about genetic superiority AKA "good breeding".
 
Doc Dutch said:
To which you've stated a few times are due to your superior genes. I get it.

Like a well programmed robot, you believe if a person has good genes then they will act properly. Again, I get it.

Understood that you believe a person with bad or defective genes will act poorly. Due to the Free Will thing, I continue to disagree.

Why do you think brain damage automatically means criminal behavior? Do you attribute your superior genes to a lack of criminal behavior despite CTE?

On the contrary, Free Will is only a part of us. There are genes, there are circumstances, there are illnesses which narrow one's Free Will. You say there is no such thing and I'm saying there is, but there can be limitations for a variety of reasons. From what you've posted, neef, you sound like a blueblood racist with your beliefs about genetic superiority AKA "good breeding".
Click to expand...

At the end of the day, I make no claim of being sure.
What distinguishes me-- in a small way-- is that I accept nobody else's claim of being sure, either.
If I say that "I think" or "I believe," I'm not accepting anybody's claim, "I know." There is no science backing what they claim to "know."
That's really the gist of it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top