PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
if you believe that would remove almost all guns, we will need to keep guns away from you, because you are stupid.......
Do YOU Prefer the Banning of Guns or the Requirement to Own Guns?
- Thread starter Libhater
- Start date
if you believe that would remove almost all guns, we will need to keep guns away from you, because you are stupid.......
The Revolution will rely heavily on destroying the lives of anyone who uses a gun in ways they dont approve of, but there will be many programs to get guns scrapped as well, as well as strict ammo control......as well as imposing a huge yearly tax (they will call it liability insurance)....as well as strict locked storage laws.
Jade Dragon
And I'm the one that jaded you.
I have a couple of swords on my wall and a hand-forged knife in a case.
Into the Night
Verified User
RQAA
Into the Night
Verified User
We're coming for the guns!
You can try, it won't work.
Into the Night
Verified User
No legislation needed, other than to conform to the 2nd amendment.
No permit needed. They are unconstitutional.
Useful, but mandating them is unconstitutional.
Elaborate.
Indeed it is.
Into the Night
Verified User
All of these rules are completely ineffective.
It's just too easy to make a gun and the ammunition for it.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
People can always tell a schizo...they just can't tell them much.
QED
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Post #14.
Only a complete asshole would try to build on a factually disproven OP. Way to go, Hawk.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Mason Michaels
Verified User
It's just a matter of time till we get the guns
Get caught with it and not only your life will be destroyed, so will the lives of your family and friends.
Pols only ban guns for fear of them being used against themselves.
This is exactly the reason they were constitutionally protected in the first place.
That's also why they are more concerned about rifles than handguns despite the fact that Giffords and Reagan were shot with handguns. Rifles allow one to be much farther away from your target and harder for the protective services to defend against.
I would prefer everyone be required to conceal or open carry. Good reason to be polite.
This is exactly the reason they were constitutionally protected in the first place.
That's also why they are more concerned about rifles than handguns despite the fact that Giffords and Reagan were shot with handguns. Rifles allow one to be much farther away from your target and harder for the protective services to defend against.
I would prefer everyone be required to conceal or open carry. Good reason to be polite.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Um, NO? As it stands, there are strict requirements in most states to have a conceal carry permit. Open carry is essentially rare in the America...and given the rash of mass shootings and gangs that can't shoot straight, its a damned good thing for both.
The OP was pure BS, as I previously proved. Silly for anyone to try and defend or build on it.
Jade Dragon
And I'm the one that jaded you.
Awesome. Tell me more. I have a few edged weapons myself.
Here's two:
Mostly Japanese swords. I have one Katana and one wakizashi. I also have a katana with ornate metal decorations.
Mason Michaels
Verified User
Now, now....it's not nice to tease the paranoid and mentally challenged.
Their guns will be gone before they know what hits them!
Mason Michaels
Verified User
Mostly Japanese swords. I have one Katana and one wakizashi. I also have a katana with ornate metal decorations.
"Live by the Sword die by the Sword"
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Seriously, you and I both know that ain't happening. The worst case scenario for our resident gunners is the re-instatement of the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994,. Even then, the little paranoids will have legal access to more guns and rifles than they could shake a stick at.