Do you still support America's genocide in the Middle East?

I am not hollering and screaming. In fact, my posts are far more rational than yours.

Maybe in the delusional world you've created for yourself; because you've done nothing but dismiss everything that anyone else has presented and then you continue to chant your mantra of "genocide - genocide - genocide".
 
Politicians in Iraq have called for the permanent exile of the Iraqi defector, codenamed Curveball by his US and German handlers, who admitted to the Guardian he lied about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi said he invented stories about Saddam Hussein's non-existent bioweapons programme in order to "liberate" Iraq.

But if he thought that his mea culpa would make him a hero, it seems he was wrong. "He is a liar, he will not serve his country," one Iraqi politician said in response to Curveball's claim to want to build a political career in his motherland.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/feb/16/curveball-exile-wmd-lies-iraq-politicians
 
Afganistan is one of the fastest growing economies in the world. America has rebuilt everything we blew up and has been doing massive infrastructure projects. We have built lots of roads, hospitals, power plants, schools, power lines. We have reimbursted people for destruction of property. America creates lots of jobs in Afganistan. We bribe people which allows them to hire more workers. We fund education and send lots of medical supplies. America funnels a lot of donations to Afganistan. A lot Less people are dying now then in the 90
s.
Then theirs Iraq. Saddam only commited genocide and used weapons of mass destruction. Lots of people died under his rain. A lot Less people are dying now then under Saddam. America caused rapid economic growth in Iraq. We rebuilt everything we destroyed and massively invested in the countries infrastructure. Economically Iraq and Afganistan are better off that we invaded them. Educationally, Infrastructure is better off because of U.S. Afganies and Iraqies have more freedom and money now.




Seriously...I reimbursted one of my friends once and they didn't really like it very much. They said it hurt. The wimps.
Oh and what kind of rain was it? Was it like acid rain or something? I'm so confused.
 
Looks like Egypt is going to keep some of the blood off our hands in Libya. Meanwhile, the Somalians continue the killing on their own.
 
O.K., so now that we are killing people in five countries, often women and children, often non-millitants, is it time to revisit this topic?
 
O.K., so now that we are killing people in five countries, often women and children, often non-millitants, is it time to revisit this topic?

Yeah, let's discuss what we do about this now that we can't hold the president accountable because that would be racist? Let's talk about how getting rid of 'Cowboy Diplomat' Bush and electing a Democrat, didn't bring the peace and love liberal mush-brains promised? Let's revisit "exit strategies" and how they are essential? Let's revisit what "victory" looks like? Let's talk about when you and the people who elected Obama, are going to hold him accountable for the flag-draped coffins returning to America daily, and why there is no "timeline for withdrawal?" Let's talk about how we don't see the Vietnam-style protests on the Mall anymore? Yep, I think it's a great time to revisit this!
 
Let's discuss how we managed to get involved in war with three more countries and no one in Congress passed a declaration of war or authorized military action? Let's talk about how we've not heard peep one from the MSM on any of this? Let's revisit "unilateral action" without the approval of the UN, or any goddamn body else? Seems when Bush was president, all this stuff I'm bringing up was a really big deal, and now it's not!

Do you REALLY want to revisit this? OR... Do you just want to act like you're 8-years old and lob insults at me?
 
Let's discuss how we managed to get involved in war with three more countries and no one in Congress passed a declaration of war or authorized military action? Let's talk about how we've not heard peep one from the MSM on any of this? Let's revisit "unilateral action" without the approval of the UN, or any goddamn body else? Seems when Bush was president, all this stuff I'm bringing up was a really big deal, and now it's not!

Do your REALLY want to revisit this? OR... Do you just want to act like you're 8-years old and lob insults at me?
You do understand that I agree with you right
 
You have to admit, that is a difficult thing for me to comprehend. Has this EVER happened before in the history of the universe?

Never.
Now back to our regular sheduled argument;
Depite Obama's admitted flaws and failures, Mitt will make the situation worse.
Betwen his hawkish views on Iran, his complete lack of foriegn policy experience and his obvious allegiance to corporatism (MIC) the killing in the ME will surely increase under his rule.
 
Yeah, let's discuss what we do about this now that we can't hold the president accountable because that would be racist? Let's talk about how getting rid of 'Cowboy Diplomat' Bush and electing a Democrat, didn't bring the peace and love liberal mush-brains promised? Let's revisit "exit strategies" and how they are essential? Let's revisit what "victory" looks like? Let's talk about when you and the people who elected Obama, are going to hold him accountable for the flag-draped coffins returning to America daily, and why there is no "timeline for withdrawal?" Let's talk about how we don't see the Vietnam-style protests on the Mall anymore? Yep, I think it's a great time to revisit this!
all valid points. Democratic silence,and even worse electioneering on simplistic "we got bin Laden" we got Gadaffi" makes me puke.
I can't believe I was a life long Democrat. That party died with Paul Wellstone/Kuchinick.

The only other time I left the Democratic Party was during LBJ's destruction in Vietnam. Obama is righ up ther with him, not carpetbombing, but endless widespread war.
Amazing how the Dem's don't hear themselves, on this - i think they (most ) do, but would rather just stick their heads in the sand.
 
Never.
Now back to our regular sheduled argument;
Depite Obama's admitted flaws and failures, Mitt will make the situation worse.
Betwen his hawkish views on Iran, his complete lack of foriegn policy experience and his obvious allegiance to corporatism (MIC) the killing in the ME will surely increase under his rule.

If Obama gets re-elected and then attacks Iran, I will so LOL on this board about it. :D
 
If Obama gets re-elected and then attacks Iran, I will so LOL on this board about it. :D

Oh, both of them are going to end up playing war games in the middle east. Nobody is denying that Obama is bad. The left's position is that Romney would be worse, though looking at it, I can hardly see how.
 
Oh, both of them are going to end up playing war games in the middle east. Nobody is denying that Obama is bad. The left's position is that Romney would be worse, though looking at it, I can hardly see how.

Why don't you go ahead and post Romney's position(s) on the ME. LOL
 
Why don't you go ahead and post Romney's position(s) on the ME. LOL

Same as Obama's, Israel will be backed at all cost, invade countries we don't like, claim dictators need deposing and quietly fund the dictators and regimes that let us do business. Don't let the Iranians get nukes and make faces at the Syrians.

Romney wants to play "hard ball" with the chinese but that appears to be his only point up on Obama, and Obama might decide he has to be a hard ball player too at any point.
 
Back
Top