Every debate with a creationist ever

Silencio said:
said poster also has claimed to be a christian atheist, more atheist than the other claimed atheists on the board, has talked to jesus in the shower, but also doesn't call himself a christian anymore.
Click to expand...
LOL> Geebus.

The poster is the creator of most of the longest threads this board has ever seen.
 
Dixie said:
The only hyperbole is coming from the Warmers, who cling to their faith that man is causing global warming. This, in spite of the evidence to the contrary. Phil Jones himself admits, there has been no warming since 1995, and in fact, we are currently in a cooling trend. So who is being stupid, and who is recognizing scientific facts?
Click to expand...

So Phil Jones data is not good to prove global warming, but some off-hand remarks (doubtlessly misinterpreted) of his are?

NASA recently came out with a report saying that this is the warmest decade in 2000 years. NASA's data and ethics have never been called into question.
 
Dixie said:
Did NASA determine that man was causing global warming? I did not know that! Can you link me up with this finding? Because something like that might change my mind!
Click to expand...

Here comes the wack-a-mole. I smash one of his questions, so instead of defending the point, he runs off to an unrelated one.

I'll just make a little scoreboard:

WM: 1
Dix: 0


To respond to your new, unrelated non response to my question, you do not "prove" things in science. It's not a math equation. You gather evidence for scientific theories. NASA is one of the organizations that is compiling evidence for global warming. Here is information on how they and others are doing that:


  1. NASA http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/global...worldbook.html http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Fea...lWarmingQandA/ http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A2.lrg.gif (The graph)
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Climatic Data Center http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html
  3. World Meteorological Organization (WMO) http://www.wmo.ch/pages/about/wmo50/...warming_e.html
  4. American Meteorological Society http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/2007climatechange.html
  5. National Center for Atmospheric Research “How do we know Earth is warming now?” http://www.ncar.ucar.edu/research/climate/now.php
  6. Earth System Research Laboratory - Global Monitoring Division “Climate Forcing” http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/about/climate.html
  7. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research http://www.ucar.edu/research/climate/warming.jsp
  8. Jet Propulsion Laboratory - California Institute of Technology “Global Climate Change” “How do we know?” http://climate.jpl.nasa.gov/evidence/
  9. American Geophysical Union (world's largest scientific society of Earth and space scientists) “Human Impacts on Climate” http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/policy/cl..._position.html
  10. American Association for the Advancement of Science “The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now” http://www.aaas.org/news/press_room/..._statement.pdf http://www.aaas.org/news/press_room/climate_change/
  11. The United States Energy Information Administration “Greenhouse Gases, Climate Change, and Energy” http://www.eia.doe.gov/bookshelf/bro...e/Chapter1.htm
  12. Massachusetts Institute of Technology “Report: Human activity fuels global warming” http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2007/climate.html
  13. California Institute of Technology “How We Know Global Warming is Real” “The science behind human-induced climate change” http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~tapio/papers/skeptic_2008.pdf
  14. Atmospheric Sciences - University of Illinois - Champaign “Evidence continues to mount that human activities are altering the Earth’s climate on a global scale.” http://www.atmos.uiuc.edu/research/01climate.html
  15. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution “Global Warming” http://www.whoi.edu/page.do?pid=12457
  16. The UK’s Met Office Hadley Centre “Climate change - the big picture” http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...ths/index.html http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/guide/
  17. The UK’s Royal Society “Climate change controversies: a simple guide” http://royalsociety.org/page.asp?id=6229
  18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Based in Switzerland) “Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report” http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-re...r4_syr_spm.pdf
  19. Japan Meteorological Agency “Global Warming Projection Vol.7” http://ds.data.jma.go.jp/tcc/tcc/pro...7/index-e.html
  20. The Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society “Our climate has changed substantially.” “Global climate change and global warming are real and observable.” http://www.amos.org.au/publications/...t/publications
  21. Royal Society of New Zealand “The globe is warming because of increasing greenhouse gas emissions.” http://www.royalsociety.org.nz/Site/.../clim0708.aspx
  22. National Geographic Magazine http://environment.nationalgeographi...lobal-warming/
  23. Scientific American Magazine http://www.sciam.com/topic.cfm?id=gl...climate-change
 
I'd just like to point out here that Dixie has had things mathematically proved, like in a math equation, and not believed them before. Dixie's opinion is unchangeable and evidence less, like that of so many Americans today.
 
To respond to your new, unrelated non response to my question, you do not "prove" things in science. It's not a math equation. You gather evidence for scientific theories. NASA is one of the organizations that is compiling evidence for global warming. Here is information on how they and others are doing that:
Click to expand...

Okay, so you are admitting that NASA has not determined that man is causing global warming. Thank you very much, that is pretty much what I thought. As I said, you believe in a faith, nothing more. That is not a fact, not proven, not definitive. It's fine for you to have faith, I encourage people to have faith all the time, but please stop mistaking faith for proven facts, they are two entirely different things.
 
Dixie said:
Thank you very much, that is pretty much what I thought. As I said, you believe in a faith, nothing more. That is not a fact, not proven, not definitive. It's fine for you to have faith, I encourage people to have faith all the time, but please stop mistaking faith for proven facts, they are two entirely different things.
Click to expand...

Noting is definitive or proven outside of math. Trying to draw an exact equivalency in probability and evidence between all things that aren't mathematical equations is absurd. Global warming has a great deal of evidence for it. God has no evidence for it. Faith comes with evidence, not the other way around.
 
HUGO STIGLITZ said:
Noting is definitive or proven outside of math. Trying to draw an exact equivalency in probability and evidence between all things that aren't mathematical equations is absurd. Global warming has a great deal of evidence for it. God has no evidence for it. Faith comes with evidence, not the other way around.
Click to expand...

Okay, so it is "absurd" to believe it is a proven fact that man is causing global warming. Thanks for confirming that!
 
Dixie said:
Okay, so it is "absurd" to believe it is a proven fact that man is causing global warming. Thanks for confirming that!
Click to expand...

This is what i get for trying to argue dixie using complicated concepts above his grade level.

WM: infinity
Dixie: 0

WM wins the round. See you another day.
 
Ever notice that dixie doesn't ever actually reply to a question? He just responds with another question or claim. That's why it's impossible to debate him. He debates like a police interrogator.
 
what i have noticed is that these religious retards never seem to defend their own illogical viewpoints, rather their approach is to try and go "SEE YOU ARE JUST AS STUPID AS ME!" which constitutes the bulk of dixie's arguments
 
HUGO STIGLITZ said:
This is what i get for trying to argue dixie using complicated concepts above his grade level.

WM: infinity
Dixie: 0

WM wins the round. See you another day.
Click to expand...
Since the infinite is incalculable, technically you have zero as well. Nice way to tie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top