Global fry-up.

This is not normal: what's different about the NSW mega fires

I write this piece reluctantly, because there are still possible fire victims unaccounted for; people have lost loved ones; and hundreds of families have lost their homes. My heart goes out to them. I don’t want to detract in any way from the vital safety messages that our fire commissioners and Premier will be making about Tuesday’s fire potential.

“Unprecedented” is a word that we are hearing a lot: from fire chiefs, politicians, and the weather bureau. I have just returned from California where I spoke to fire chiefs still battling unseasonal fires. The same word, “unprecedented”, came up.

Unprecedented dryness; reductions in long-term rainfall; low humidity; high temperatures; wind velocities; fire danger indices; fire spread and ferocity; instances of pyro-convective fires (fire storms – making their own weather); early starts and late finishes to bushfire seasons. An established long-term trend driven by a warming, drying climate. The numbers don’t lie, and the science is clear.
If anyone tells you, “This is part of a normal cycle” or “We’ve had fires like this before”, smile politely and walk away, because they don’t know what they’re talking about.

In NSW, our worst fire years were almost always during an El Nino event, and major property losses generally occurred from late November to February. Based on more than a century of weather observations our official fire danger season is legislated from October 1 to March 31. During the 2000s though, major fires have regularly started in August and September, and sometimes go through to April.

The October 2013 fires that destroyed more than 200 homes were the earliest large-loss fires in NSW history – again, not during an El Nino.

This year, by the beginning of November, we had already lost about as many homes as during the disastrous 2001-2002 bushfire season. We’ve now eclipsed 1994 fire losses.

fca6cdb194254db8eeb53e10c1b026055bc1dc49


On Friday, the NSW Rural Fire Service sent out an alert that fires were creating thunderstorms – pyro-convective events. In my 47 years of fighting fires I don’t remember this happening much. Now it happens quite regularly. On Friday, the atmosphere was relatively stable and therefore shouldn’t have been conducive to these wildly unpredictable and dangerous events. Yet it happened. Unprecedented.

The drought we are facing is more intense than the Millennium Drought, with higher levels of evaporation due to higher temperatures. This has dried out the bush and made it easier for fires to start, easier for them to spread quickly, and as we saw on Friday, enabling spot fires to start twice as far ahead of the main fires as we would normally expect.

Together with 22 other retired fire and emergency service chiefs, I spoke out earlier this year. We felt we had a duty to tell people how climate change is super-charging our natural disaster risks. I wish we were wrong, but we’re not.

I’m confident that our national government, when the smoke and dust settles, will finally see the obvious and understand the word “unprecedented”. I’m sure it will then start to take decisive action to tackle the base cause – greenhouse emissions - then use the high moral ground to lean on other countries to also do the right thing.

In the meantime, please, please play it safe, and act on the vital fire service warnings.

Greg Mullins is a former Fire and Rescue NSW commissioner and a councillor on the Climate Council.


https://www.smh.com.au/national/thi...0rXL6DgJnWKxiemkyvkmomokatyGIMwnrn4noxfyKwVyU






........................................................................................................................................................
About which Greta Thunberg pointed out in her tweet:
"The numbers don’t lie, and the science is clear.
If anyone tells you, 'This is part of a normal cycle' or 'We’ve had fires like this before', smile politely and walk away, because they don’t know what they’re talking about."

There's that word again- ' unprecedented '.
 
So why don't you post them instead of trying to be contrary and making yourself look stoopid.

No, that would be YOU. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. There are not enough thermometers. You are denying mathematics again.
 
Global warming brings ' record ' everything, you dumb British cluck, record heat, record cold, record wet, record dry.

Now go wave your infamous cut-and-pastes from your certifiable mushroom-farmer. Haw, haw............................haw.

Define 'global warming'.
 
That's right.
It's global warming!!!!! ... because... well... it just is. Just have faith, okay? ;) ;)

The global climate is changing.
There is no such thing as a "global climate". Earth has NUMEROUS climates.

Try thinking of these concepts separately; 1) Globe. 2) Climate 3) Change.
See how easy it is without trolls and their socks farting their contrarian gas ?
Define "global climate". Define "climate change".

Now- you don't come across as a self-serving, attention-seeking troll of the obnoxious kind- so here's a list of terms that you can expect to see turning up in weather descriptions from all over the world from here on in which might help your focus;
Let's see them...

extraordinary
Subjective. Not quantifiable.

Subjective. Not quantifiable.

unparalleled
Subjective. Not quantifiable.

Subjective. Not quantifiable.

Subjective. Not quantifiable.

anomalous
Subjective. Not quantifiable.

Subjective. Not quantifiable.

Subjective. Not quantifiable.

preternatural
Subjective. Not quantifiable.

Subjective. Not quantifiable.

Enjoy them while you may- because the conditions they describe will soon become the new ' normal '.
Define "normal" weather.

It will be open season on climate deniers at that point.
It would be "open season" for you too, dumbass... The Goddess 'Climate' will not save you from your 'carbon sins'.
 
It would be "open season" for you too, dumbass... The Goddess 'Climate' will not save you from your 'carbon sins'.


You misunderstand, dumbass sock. ' Open season ' is a hunting term. You and your ilk will change from dangerous ecocidal morons into prey. Or do you think that climate victims will just sit around and let you get away with it ?

Haw, haw...........................haw.
 
You misunderstand, dumbass sock.
YALIF. YALSA.

' Open season ' is a hunting term.
Correct.

You and your ilk will change from dangerous ecocidal morons into prey.
Threatening those who do not adhere to your religion... Interesting...

Or do you think that climate victims will just sit around and let you get away with it ?
We would ALL be "climate victims", dumbass... Define "climate victims".

Haw, haw...........................haw.
laughter of a trollish moron... priceless.
 
You misunderstand, dumbass sock. ' Open season ' is a hunting term. You and your ilk will change from dangerous ecocidal morons into prey. Or do you think that climate victims will just sit around and let you get away with it ?

Haw, haw...........................haw.

What 'climate victims'? Define 'climate change'.
 
Climate change: Bigger hurricanes are now more damaging

_109616573_gettyimages-510976041.jpg


The biggest and most damaging hurricanes are now three times more frequent than they were 100 years ago, say researchers.

Using a new method of calculating the destruction, the scientists say the increase in frequency is "unequivocal".

Previous attempts to isolate the impact of climate change on hurricanes have often came up with conflicting results.

But the new study says the increase in damage caused by these big cyclones is linked by global warming.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-50380431
 
Climate change: Bigger hurricanes are now more damaging

_109616573_gettyimages-510976041.jpg


The biggest and most damaging hurricanes are now three times more frequent than they were 100 years ago, say researchers.

Using a new method of calculating the destruction, the scientists say the increase in frequency is "unequivocal".

Previous attempts to isolate the impact of climate change on hurricanes have often came up with conflicting results.

But the new study says the increase in damage caused by these big cyclones is linked by global warming.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-50380431

Define "climate change". Define "global warming".
 
Climate change: Bigger hurricanes are now more damaging

_109616573_gettyimages-510976041.jpg


The biggest and most damaging hurricanes are now three times more frequent than they were 100 years ago, say researchers.

Using a new method of calculating the destruction, the scientists say the increase in frequency is "unequivocal".

Previous attempts to isolate the impact of climate change on hurricanes have often came up with conflicting results.

But the new study says the increase in damage caused by these big cyclones is linked by global warming.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-50380431

I knew even before I read the byline that this was another bullshit article by Matt McGrath. Even the IPCC states that there is no increase in hurricanes.
h.
 
Back
Top