moon
Satire for Sanity
All your text is predictable, maggot. Self-serving establishment tripe.
Greta Thunberg
- Thread starter anonymoose
- Start date
All your text is predictable, maggot. Self-serving establishment tripe.
Iolo/Penderyn
Verified User
Terri4Trump
Verified User
What an embarrassment you are. You sound like a sniveling bitch. Your father should beat the shit out of you
moon
Satire for Sanity
You sound like a propaganda pimp for everything that thinking folk despise.
Terri4Trump
Verified User
Well you are NOT thinking folk so shut your gonad gargling yap, moron
moon
Satire for Sanity
Oh I'm thinking folk alright, addlepate- as you'll soon appreciate.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Taichiliberal,
Many of the Parkland kids AND THEIR SUPPORTERS AND PEERS will be voting in 2020.
First they marched for their lives, next they will be voting for their lives.
Many of the Parkland kids AND THEIR SUPPORTERS AND PEERS will be voting in 2020.
First they marched for their lives, next they will be voting for their lives.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello moose,
No, Google is definitely NOT your friend.
I do NOT consider it very friendly to follow you around everywhere you go, making notes and keeping records on you to be sold to marketeers and political action committees, NOR to control what you see, deciding FOR YOU what you want. No. Google is definitely NOT your friend. Google does not work for you. It works for very rich people to extract your wealth and give it to the super-greedy.
Where Google is on your case, you cannot have a private life.
No, Google is definitely NOT your friend.
I do NOT consider it very friendly to follow you around everywhere you go, making notes and keeping records on you to be sold to marketeers and political action committees, NOR to control what you see, deciding FOR YOU what you want. No. Google is definitely NOT your friend. Google does not work for you. It works for very rich people to extract your wealth and give it to the super-greedy.
Where Google is on your case, you cannot have a private life.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
NASA only offers up a circular definition of the phrase 'climate change' on their website. Circular definitions do not work; they are meaningless, as they make reference to nothing outside of themselves. Any argument based upon a circular definition is thus rendered a void argument, in violation of logic. So, I ask again, define "climate change".
Useless definition, as it is based upon words which themselves are undefined. Define "climate change". Define "global warming". There is no "the climate", as Earth has many varying climates.
Ignored on sight, as this is an Appeal To False Authority Fallacy. 'Scientific American' and 'Science Daily' are not science. You need to look at the theories of science themselves.
See above.
See above.
See above.
No, you are showing ignorance of the theories of science which stand in the way of your religious belief.
I am quite aware of the logic, science, and math which stand in the way of the "global warming" hysteria.
I've given you a rational response. I suggest becoming literate in logic, science, and mathematics.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Taichiliberal,
If moose had a good argument it would be used; and there would be no attempt to exaggerate or twist what you say.
If moose had a good argument it would be used; and there would be no attempt to exaggerate or twist what you say.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
A vulgar woman holding a stupid sign?
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Apparently she needs to study how "won't" should have a " ' " between the n and the t.
Sad how she's claiming to study while considering it a waste of time.
It's obvious she won't have a future. Perhaps fast food for her.
You have been insulting my intelligence by attempting to insinuate that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas and that humans are not having an impact on the climate. The fact that you were reduced to time-traveling back to 2007 to post an obscure article written by an obscure German chemist, which has been debunked in the ensuing years, does not even even meet the qualifications of tepid and weak.
I have no inclination to debate whether CO2 is a greenhouse gas anymore than I am inclined to debate whether Elvis Presley faked his death.
A debate like that is fertile terrain for the dishonest and the dumb.
Your attempt to insinuate that humans have no impact on the climate and that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas can only be attributable to one or more of the following>
You like to indulge in childish trolling.
You are willfully dishonest.
You are shockingly uninformed about this topic.
Rather than demanding that obscure posters on obscure message boards explain greenhouse warming and climate change to you, here is my suggestion:
Get your nose out of obscure rightwing Denier blogs, and go to the websites of prestigious and internationally-recognized science organizations with expertise in climate.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello TOP,
They are many.
Besides reducing personal carbon footprints, we need to vote for leaders who support the transition from carbon heavy tech to carbon neutral or carbon negative tech. We all need to understand the changes we need to make as a society. We need to welcome and embrace a new way of doing things. This may be daunting, like a kid going to school for the first time, a new world, but once we get into it, we will find that it will be a finer life. We will have cleaner air and more secure and reliable energy sources. There will be multitudes of new jobs and money to be made for the willing and able.
They are many.
Besides reducing personal carbon footprints, we need to vote for leaders who support the transition from carbon heavy tech to carbon neutral or carbon negative tech. We all need to understand the changes we need to make as a society. We need to welcome and embrace a new way of doing things. This may be daunting, like a kid going to school for the first time, a new world, but once we get into it, we will find that it will be a finer life. We will have cleaner air and more secure and reliable energy sources. There will be multitudes of new jobs and money to be made for the willing and able.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Why do we need to make such changes?
saltydancin
Verified User
Oh no, it's the back to the future "serve the Pope or die" megalomaniacal Star Trek Inquisition from the 9/11 supreme swastika up Uranus court of Islam oil dhimmitude servitude Christiananality pedophilia based on fabricated misnomers of immaculate conceptions; translated into Islamophobia Christian suicidal super ego homicidal sociopsychopathiliogical environmental human farming mass extinctions avoidance - acceptance playing Chinese checkers with life.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
You have no intelligence to insult.
It's not.
What "impact"? The Earth has MANY differing climates; there is no "global climate".
Yes, we are all well aware that you are a fundamentalist believer in your "global warming" faith...
Nah, that's you good buddy.
There is no "the climate"; the Earth has many differing climates.
It's not.
False Dichotomy Fallacy.
I don't.
I'm not.
I am quite informed.
Instead, it might be attributable to my knowledge of the logic, science, and mathematics which stands in the way of "global warming" hysteria.
Bulverism Fallacy.
There are no "greenhouse gases".
Define "climate change".
I don't read blogs.
Science is not consensus, peer-review, an organization, a website, etc... Science is simply a set of falsifiable theories. I suggest that you learn the theories themselves and why AGW theory is not possible.
