Greta Thunberg

Ralph said:
Everything was created to "DIE".....everything, everyone has a "best if used by label", tis the problem with the leftist mindset, they pretend they are immortal, self professed gods (with a little g), they can't seem to wrStarted by sorting clothing hangers & advanced to inventory shipment checking & stocking plus sales floor experience along with authorized returns, ordering goods, invoice payments, payroll checks, bank deposits, tax filing, plus window displays with a Dunn & Bradstreet listed business rating. Jack of all trades doing outdoor painting, indoor remodeling of store with drop ceilings & fluorescent lighting, 2 x 4 walls & partitions with paneling & drywall, windows, chair molding, baseboard trim, carpet & underpad, plumbing additions + new electrical fuse panel, wiring & outlets.ap their heads around the fact that they are dying from the very moment they are created, its the state of the natural world.
Thus the need that is innate in all human beings.....to seek out the very reason they "feel" immortal, innately knowing that some part of them indeed is "eternal", never coming to realize that need, that desire, that compulsion cannot be found in the physical world, its an innate Spiritual force that animates the body human, a very UN-NATURAL eternal force that cannot be defined or measured (quantified) through the laws of physical reality. Life and Love are beyond quantification via algorithms.
Life can never be CREATED by the physical....life can only be PROCREATED within preexisting species. Love can only be "experienced"...it is beyond definition (some attempt to define the symptoms of love...and call it a definition, but in reality....love is a force unto itself, it cannot be directed....only enjoyed, accepted or rejected.
Thus the left wing paradox......they feel like they are going to live forever, they feel like they are directors of their own moral compass.....then one day, they finally have an epiphany....they were born to die, they will die regardless of wealth, fame, social status, power....etc., Some deal with that reality.....others do not, they hide from it, they are called social progressives and they refuse to accept that innate desire that defines their own knowledge of mortality. Some "snap" when they realize....nothing they have been taught is real, its all an illusion. There are countless examples of famous, arrogant assholes that have lived their lives screwing everything in front of them and shitting on everything behind them.....in the end they take their own lives with that sudden realization that nothing can save them from their fate. They are arrogant cowards while living, and to cowardly to face that which is natural....death, they snap and eat a bottle pills chasing it with a 1/5th of courage and punch their own ticket...they have nothing to live for...…...:bigthink: they have never encountered that which is truly eternal....love actual....they lived loving only themselves. Such a waste. There is a formula....Love is Life....Life is Love. Life is not to be wasted...it never belonged to you in the first place, you exist only due to the eternal love of that which created you. Call it what you will....I and my people call it the creator....you ignore that innate reality at your own risk.
Click to expand...

Everything was created to "DIE".....everything, everyone has a "best if used by label",
Obviously Greta comprehends the earth best used by date has expired from those survival of the fittest fascists Christiananality pedophilia mentality business as usual game.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Havana Moon said:
Maybe if you differentiated between AGW and GW you might sound more lucid? What the argument really boils down to is how much of an AGW signal is present. I, along with many distinguished climate scientists, believe that the signal is tenuous at best and a doubling of CO2 will lead to around 1.2C of warming from 1780, the start of the Industrial Age. You, on the other hand, are scared witless by climate models that predict all kind of calamities which are simply not justified by empirical evidence. Here is the equation used by the IPCC, please note that there is a logarithmic not a linear relationship.

e36cc031b0e6d6b47508b2ae11126abee86f2de8


where C is the CO2 concentration in parts per million by volume and C[SUB]0[/SUB] is the reference concentration.[SUP][8][/SUP] The relationship between carbon dioxide and radiative forcing is logarithmic,[SUP][9][/SUP] at concentrations up to around eight times the current value, and thus increased concentrations have a progressively smaller warming effect.
Click to expand...

A random equation produced without any reference is useless.

What units is 'forcing' in? Where does the 5.35 constant come from? Why is the equation based on a base rate fallacy? How does CO2 relate to watts? It is not energy or power. What theory is this equation formalized from? How is that theory falsifiable?

Any idiot can write an equation. It has to mean something to be of any real use though.
 
moon said:
The global climate has changed over geological time. Human activity has forced the current changes and is continuing to do so under the moronic gaze of self-serving ecocidal criminals such as you.

Greta's gonna getcha.
Click to expand...

Circular definition. Define 'climate change'.
 
Havana Moon said:
Fuck the world, the only evidence is scientific not what a bunch of ignorant Millennials think.
Click to expand...

There is no such thing as 'scientific' evidence. Science is a set of falsifiable theories, not evidence. There is simply evidence, or there is not. There is nothing 'scientific' about any evidence.
 
Into the Night said:
There is no such thing as 'scientific' evidence. Science is a set of falsifiable theories, not evidence. There is simply evidence, or there is not. There is nothing 'scientific' about any evidence.
Click to expand...

Obviously oceans warming from absorbing excess CO2 & rising higher due to glacial melting is falsifiable pseudoscience & not evidence with nothing scientific about it from a chronological timeline; theoretically like Galileo & medieval Ptolemaic theory.
 
Into the Night said:
A random equation produced without any reference is useless.

What units is 'forcing' in? Where does the 5.35 constant come from? Why is the equation based on a base rate fallacy? How does CO2 relate to watts? It is not energy or power. What theory is this equation formalized from? How is that theory falsifiable?

Any idiot can write an equation. It has to mean something to be of any real use though.
Click to expand...

The equation tells you that the forcing is in watts per square metre. As for the rest I'm sorry but anybody that is incapable of understanding basic physics and spouts utter bullshit about the laws of thermodynamics is not going to get any respect from me.
 
Phantasmal said:
I’ve seen the response to her. She is greatly admired.
Click to expand...

Depends. She's admired by those that lied to her that the world is ending in 12 yrs. She's also greatly pitied. She admits her "childhood and dreams were stolen by your lies". I still believe there's hope for her with intense cognitive therapy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top