"Grrr I hate it so much when loans are forgiven"

[Flash]

OK a couple things...

1. You didn't link to the actual post, which was from 4/27/20. But I did because unlike you, I'm not a liar by omission.

2. Here's what I said on 4/8/20:



3. Is time linear? Does 4/8/20 come before or after 4/27/20?

Now, really think about this, Flash...put those few remaining brain cells you have left together and think really hard about whether or not time is linear.

Because you said "try" first is a lame excuse for claiming you did not say "cancel" later. You said both and whatever you said first does not change the fact that later you omitted the "try."

So, you thought he would "try" to cancel on 4/8/20 but by 4/27/20 you had switched to "cancel" the general election and the primaries.

This is why you are a liar. You did say he would cancel the election and the primaries. He did neither. Wrong again.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Roe was a prediction for the future I was wrong about including VP Harris, most Democrats, most constitutional scholars--like you were wrong about Trump "canceling" the election.

Sunset laws already exist. They are a waste of time because the legislation is almost always renewed.

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell flatly said that, if the Republicans win control of the Senate, sunsetting Social Security and Medicare “would not be a part of our agenda.”

While nobody knew for sure, all the trickery by the Republicans and their stacking of the Supreme Court leading to the overturn of Roe v. Wade, gay marriage and other rights was a reasonable foreseeable conclusion.

People had been worried about how far SCOTUS was leaning right for years...and for good reason as We, the People saw this year.

What bothers me the most is how the Republicans gleefully allowed corrupt Justices who perjured themselves during confirmation to sit on the Supreme Court. It's one of the main pieces of evidence supporting "I didn't leave the Republican Party. The Republican Party left me".

It also explains why, up to 75% of Americans view SCOTUS as corrupt and unfavorably.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/394103/confidence-supreme-court-sinks-historic-low.aspx
JUNE 23, 2022
Confidence in U.S. Supreme Court Sinks to Historic Low

• 25% of Americans have confidence in Supreme Court, down from 36% in 2021
• Current reading is five percentage points lower than prior record low
• Confidence is down among Democrats and independents this year

IMO, pissing off the Independents by stripping them of their freedom costs both parties, but in this case, will cost the Republicans the most.

 

[LV426]

Roe was a prediction for the future I was wrong about including VP Harris, most Democrats, most constitutional scholars--like you were wrong about Trump "canceling" the election.

Again, I said he would try to cancel the election (From 4/8/20):

Oh, I still believe Trump and the GOP are going to try to cancel the election.

Whether they are successful really depends on how much benefit of the doubt you, personally, are willing to give them.

So you keep lying about this despite the facts and the reason why you do it is entirely personal.

You hate the fact that I constantly make you look like a piece of shit here, that it's starting to have an effect on you, and that upsets you because you cannot conceive that anyone could get the better of you on anything.

 

[LV426]

Sunset laws already exist. They are a waste of time because the legislation is almost always renewed.

"Almost always", huh?

 

[Flash]

Again, you don't link to any of these posts or threads because you know that I said he would TRY to cancel the election, and everything I wrote after that is within that context.

Here's the thread: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-years/page14&highlight=trump+cancel+election

You misread it because you're too emotional to debate me.




Ah, so how come you didn't link to this thread?

I will, because I'm such a nice guy. From 4/8/2020:



This is the second time I've had to reach back into my posting history to prove you wrong about this.

The second time.

You continue to lie because I am under your skin and you can't stand that I'm better than you at everything.

You are so, so easy to unbalance and unhinge...all it takes is calling out your selfish ego and you spin out of control.

Are you now claiming this was not your post?

Step 1: Delay or cancel primaries (already happened)
Step 2: Oppose mail-in balloting by destroying the post office (already happening)
Step 3: Cancel the general election out of concerns for "safety"; concerns that could have been addressed, if not for Step #2.

I'm not sure how to link to a post, but this is clearly your post. This shows why you are such a phony. I prove you are wrong and you claim because I did not link to it that makes it untrue. Admit you are wrong LV426, you did say "cancel" without "try" in the sentence. You will resort to the wildest semantics to get out of telling the truth.

 

[LV426]

"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell flatly said that, if the Republicans win control of the Senate, sunsetting Social Security and Medicare “would not be a part of our agenda.”

Imagine trusting anything Mitch McConnell says...

 

[Flash]

"Almost always", huh?

Yes, If you think they are going to sunset Social Security you are just spouting another one of your Chicken Little predictions.

Democrats Misleadingly Claim 'Republicans' Plan' Would 'End' Social Security, Medicare - FactCheck.org

 

[LV426]

Are you now claiming this was not your post?

It's my post, which was made 19 days after this one:

Oh, I still believe Trump and the GOP are going to try to cancel the election.

Whether they are successful really depends on how much benefit of the doubt you, personally, are willing to give them.

So is time linear, Flash?

 

[LV426]

Yes, If you think they are going to sunset Social Security you are just spouting another one of your Chicken Little predictions.

Substitute "end Roe V. Wade" for "sunset Social Security" and you sound exactly like you did in 2016.

But this time you think you're right, don't you?

What makes you think that? What makes you think that they won't kill SS and Medicare if given the ability?

 

[Flash]

No, you're confusing it because you have no fucking idea what you're talking about, as usual.

Check your facts. Foreign debt is about 30+% of our public debt but only 20+% of our total debt.

You change your figures to match your current argument.

 

[Flash]

Substitute "end Roe V. Wade" for "sunset Social Security" and you sound exactly like you did in 2016.

But this time you think you're right, don't you?

What makes you think that? What makes you think that they won't kill SS and Medicare if given the ability?

Easy, it would be political suicide and you can't find many Republicans who want to end either SS or Medicare. The Supreme Court doesn't have to worry about reelection.

They will have to make necessary changes if they want to be able to pay all the benefits after about 2034.

 

[Flash]

It's my post, which was made 19 days after this one:

So is time linear, Flash?

What you said first is irrelevant. You claim you never said "cancel" but obviously you did. Because the "try" was first does not negate the second. You lied and using the first or second argument does not mean you did not. It is only a lame attempt at a convoluted argument to claim you were right.

 

[Flash]

Imagine trusting anything Mitch McConnell says...

He is certainly more accurate than you if you think they are going to abolish Social Security.

Later you will claim you said they will "try" to abolish SS.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

He is certainly more accurate than you if you think they are going to abolish Social Security.

Later you will claim you said they will "try" to abolish SS.

No more than the Liberals are trying to abolish private gun ownership.

They don't need to; all they have to do is chip away at it until the right is worthless.

It's like defunding the police. Police aren't being banned, just defunded until they can no longer function. That's the plan isn't it? Divide and tear down the country?

 

[LV426]

Check your facts. Foreign debt is about 30+% of our public debt but only 20+% of our total debt.

I just gave you links earlier showing it wasn't, meanwhile you're in "take my word for it" space again because you hardly ever source anything.

It's always presented with this air of infallibility, as if you don't HAVE to do research because you think you know it already.

Foreign Debt also includes individual foreign investors.

In December 2020, foreigners held 33% ($7 trillion out of $21.6 trillion) of publicly held US debt; of this $7 trillion, $4.1 trillion (59.2%) belonged to foreign governments and $2.8 trillion (40.8%) to foreign investors

And that was December 2020, when the debt was $21.6T...it is now $28T, but the foreign investors and governments hold the same amount they did before.

So it's not 33%, it's $7T out of $28T which would be 25%, not 33%.

And then of that $7T, about $4.1T is owned to foreign governments, which would account for 14% of the debt.

And of course the other piece of this is the fact that defaulting on those debtholders would have to be an active choice to make, it wouldn't happen organically out of circumstance.

So you're worried about defaulting on debt when it is literally impossible to do that without making the choice to do it...and who would want to choose to default on the debt.

And even IF we did default on that debt, how would those foreign governments even respond? Like, they're not gonna come over here and seize the Grand Canyon. They will just lose out too. So this whole conversation is pointless and stupid because there is literally no other way to default on the debt than making the choice to do so.

 

[LV426]

Easy, it would be political suicide and you can't find many Republicans who want to end either SS or Medicare..

Literally three days ago, Blake Masters, the AZ GOP Senate nominee, said this:

We’ve got to cut the knot at some point, though, because, I’ll tell you what, I’m not going to receive Social Security. … My kids, they’re not going to receive Social Security. And we need fresh and innovative thinking, right? Maybe we should privatize Social Security, right? Private retirement accounts, get the government out of it, past a certain point, because the government, it is just too big."
https://www.politifact.com/factchec...masters-stance-privatizing-social-security-s/

 

[LV426]

They will have to make necessary changes if they want to be able to pay all the benefits after about 2034.

The only change they have to make is to lift the cap on taxable income.

Speaking of which, do you support that?

 

[LV426]

What you said first is irrelevant.

Listen to how stupid you sound.

How is what I said first irrelevant when it establishes the context of everything I was saying thereafter?

Sounds to me like you thought I said something I didn't, dropped the exculpatory stuff because of how it makes you look, and then pushed out a lie to save face after another one of your terrible assurances was shat upon by the fascists you're so keen to defend.

It's not the first time you've done that either.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

[evince]

He is certainly more accurate than you if you think they are going to abolish Social Security.

Later you will claim you said they will "try" to abolish SS.

The right has talked about it every fucking time they have had enough power in our government


Yes it’s what the corporations want them to do


Only an idiot would deny that

 

[LV426]

You claim you never said "cancel" but obviously you did. Because the "try" was first does not negate the second.

Do you know sentence structure? I said "Oh I think Trump and the GOP are going to try to cancel the election".

You're a pretend professor, don't you know how a sentence is constructed?

"Try" what? Try to cancel the election. The direct object of the sentence.