Which is the sole reason the Senate doesn't balls up and force the Declaration clause. They always get to say crap like this and pretend retardation.I am not jumping on you Cypress about the "wiggle room" comment, but I just want to send notice, that there will be NO FUCKING claims of "I didn't know what he would do with it, we didn't mean it that way" when this MF bombs, and possibly nukes Iran.
Uh oh. Is AHZ getting to you?
No, the problem with AHZ is that there are some kernels of truth in his claims, there really are in all conspiracy theories, I think? And so because he gets so crazy with them, he ends up making others look crazy when they bring up simple facts.
AIPAC has the Dems on their knees. Jews usually vote Democratic, traditionally, and there is also a lot of contribution money at stake here. Look at what happened to Hillary Clinton when she dared kiss Arafat's wife on the cheek. Oh shit, you would have thought she ate a baby!
I am not jumping on you Cypress about the "wiggle room" comment, but I just want to send notice, that there will be NO FUCKING claims of "I didn't know what he would do with it, we didn't mean it that way" when this MF bombs, and possibly nukes Iran.
But it isn't. It's not 2/3 of the Senate requirement, it isn't many things. A true Declaration actually begins the use of many laws that "authorization" under the Constitutional End-Run called the "War Powers Act" does not. Such as Sedition laws.When Congress approves or authorizes use of military force against another nation...this is in fact a 'Declared War'...Iran must and will go down...all the crying in the world by pacifists will not alter the outcome!
If I say why I think it is it will be considered impolite, because you are simply not permitted to mention this.
It is because of AIPAC.
Say what you think... it cannot possibly be more impolite than yesterday.
Darla, it was about at this point during the build-up to the Iraq war that I changed into a Libertarian. I wanted a smaller government so 'we the people' actually have a say. As you can see, there is a lot more talk than there is action when it comes to politicians, and I can't stand any of them.
Which is the sole reason the Senate doesn't balls up and force the Declaration clause. They always get to say crap like this and pretend retardation.
I can't believe that they would do this at the same time they are pretending to be trying to force Bush out of Iraq.
But it isn't. It's not 2/3 of the Senate requirement, it isn't many things. A true Declaration actually begins the use of many laws that "authorization" under the Constitutional End-Run called the "War Powers Act" does not. Such as Sedition laws.
This is NOT the same thing as a declaration, it is an "excuse" for wimpy-assed Senators who will later stand in 'shock' and 'dismay' at how he 'used' their vote.
Well, I suppose when I think about it, it really isn't that shocking... because you are right... they will simply claim they "didn't know Bush was going to bomb Iran because of this".... moveon.org will tell their idiotic followers that it is all the fault of Bush and the Reps... A few Dem Congressmen will "apologize" for "being fooled by Bush yet again" and the majority of idiots on the left will eat it.... hook, line and sinker.
I can't stand them either, but I am not a believer in the free market cures, and the social safety net, in fact, the modern welfare state, are huge moral issues for me.
That's not true. Very few of us are left who are going to buy that. I mean, I didn't buy it the first time.
Thats what I like about you.... we can both go off the deep end one day and the next you can apologize and we can go back to being friends.
It is not. As I said, this is what they call "wiggle room" only a Declaration is a Declaration.70+ for 20+ against...I do believe that makes up the 2/3 vote requirement...you may use semantics all day long but it is still a declared war!