When it all comes down to it, the word "Islamofascist" is borne out of necessity because of pinheads who have a comprehension problem. We start with the "War on Terror" which was quickly rebuked by pinheads claiming, rightly so, that "terror" is a tactic, therefore, you can't wage war on a tactic. Then we attempted to explain "radical Muslim extremism" to you, and were met with the incredulous assertion that we just hate all Muslims and are racists. Next we transgressed into an idiotic debate over what exactly is "terrorism", as if it can be attributed to almost any act of violence against perceived innocent people.
So, in an attempt to get you pinheads to fully understand the weight of the situation and the serious nature of the threat we face, the amalgamation of radical Islamic extremism and theocracy was merged with the iron-fisted nature of tyranny and dictatorship, and the word "Islamofascist" emerged. You have no one but your pinheaded self to blame. Most of us were happy and content with "terrorists" to describe who the enemy is, but since nothing we tried to articulate was resonating, and every argument became a parsing of words and nuanced definitions, a better descriptor was needed.
And I don't understand why you are all of a sudden concerned with Chavez and Castro, you've never been too concerned before. In fact, most of you idiots laude these people as some sort of great leaders and fine examples of Liberal/Socialist Ideology. They are your true heroes.
