Yes cockroach, he's a liar and should have said "nearly" instead of "all."
But then you are a master of dishonest asshattery and would never let facts or reality get inthe way of your hyper partisan buffoonery.
I got two giant tortoises in my back yard. Today they were trying to have sex, although Koko (top), couldn't seem to find the sweet spot on Bob (bottom). Both these reptiles are dudes. Nature or nurture homophobes?
I got a pic of it. Koko was grunting. Bob was just chilin. Ill see if i can get the pic here.
Maybe if these 150 year old animals found Jesus, they'd refrain from oofing.
Note - Bob is ALWAYS on the bottom.
The thread is about tortoises, not marriage. But you know I've always supported gay marriage, so getting all angrified is silly.
Actually Damocles if you see the above bold you'll notice the OP is indicating that a lot of homophobic people or people who oppose homosexuality and to a greater extent gay marriage, have the opinion that homosexuality is a choice and its abnormal and unnatural.
the FACT of the matter is that public opinion is rapidly changing on this issue, and the younger demographic groups are leading the way. Gay marriage is already the law of the land in seventeen states. In seven of those, it is as a result of court action, in seven, it is as a result of legislative action by the people's elected representatives, and in three, it is as a result of the people themselves, and not their elected representatives, voting directly for it. It is only a matter of when, not if, as to whether gay marriage will become the law of the entire land.
I don't think two captive tortoises are indicative of nature. I like Beefs, and the idea is cool and funny to me, but it doesn't even follow that these two would act this way if other options were available to them.
And then after we're done destroying the family we can continue destroying Christianity and morality with the final coup de grace on the American way of life by banning all legal ownership of weapons to ensure the States supreme power and call each other Komrad as we then run evil greedy capitalist out of the country!!!
Move over Venezuela, here we KOM. LOL. Seig Heil!! Welcome to the United Socialiistic Redistributionist States of AmeriKa!! We cant all chant like robots with glazed over eyes Obama...Obama...Obama....Obama.
Interesting so are you theorizing that given their "limited environment" that their homosexual behavior is merely a product of their environment?
George Washington and Abraham Lincoln were homophobic bigots.
it really must suck to see your side losing ground on all the big issues that you have fought so hard for.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Marriage is a social construct and was never a "sacred" union. It was only made that way when religious institution started defining union. A large part of the Judeo-Christian world (including Islamic) had multiple wives. Marriage is not even a natural part of human procreation hence is why marriage is a social construct. Society psychological, lawfully, defines the parameters of what a union is. In this particular case in answering you, disregarding gays to marry is unconstitutional.
And notice your contradictory flaw:
You said: "no one cares what two homos want to do in their private time."
Then you said: "Now if you want to explain why men are different from women and how two men butt fucking was the way God or nature intended, I'm all eyes; go for it."
So obviously you care and immediately want me to explain to you how two men engage in anal sex. Honestly that is very homoerotic of you. Sorry I don't "get off" talking about other dudes sexual acts. Perhaps you want to ask someone else to explain to you.
You remind me of a rat at a city dump bragging about being king of the world.
seventeen states.... suck on it.
Interesting so are you theorizing that given their "limited environment" that their homosexual behavior is merely a product of their environment?
Edit: Damocles I invite you to read about the desert tortoise and homosexual "mounting" behavior.
it really must suck to see your side losing ground on all the big issues that you have fought so hard for.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
More likely their natural drive to mate and limited options. I don't think a bran the size of their eyeball has it in it to understand that the drive would net a different result if more selection of available "mates" was available.
Remember the famous captive penguin gay couple? They mate for life, etc. They were moved to a new zoo, one meets an unattached female and one of the couple moved on immediately while the other was depressed. I don't think it was "choice" either time, they have a drive to mate even if there are no available females.
Seventeen out of fifty-seven with two more to go not including Alaska or Hawaii; got it dunce :wink wink:
You remind me of a rat at a city dump bragging about being king of the world.