Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
^^^
Sybil be cray-cray and lives in a paranoid universe.
Hospitals Across U.S. Stop Transitioning Children After Trump Signs Order Protecting Kids
- Thread starter volsrock1
- Start date
Sybil be cray-cray and lives in a paranoid universe.
AProudLefty
Adorable how loser is screeching for attention. :)
You didn't answer the question. What is the end game?
You said a 17 year old was a "child" when you were attacking Gaetz.
But of course words mean what you want them to mean at any moment.
AProudLefty
Adorable how loser is screeching for attention. :)
Did I?
Sure I did - you just lack the intelligence and honesty to acknowledge the answer.
Some events cause the democrat party to become so deranged that their carefully crafted facade cracks and you see them in all their evil. Such is the case with the Anti-Grooming bill in Florida that stops public school teachers from sexualizing 4 and 5 year olds. The democrats have decided this is the hill they will die on, grooming now and forever.
But why?
"democrats just want to diddle kiddies" is the stock answer. But is that really it? Are all 81 million democrats, living and dead pedophiles? Some are to be sure, Joe Biden. But for the most part this misses the mark of what the democrats are trying to do.
Ultimately the goal of democrats is the destruction of America and the establishment of totalitarian dictatorship. democrats are Stalinists, fascists. What this is, is critical theory in action. Young children are brought into the public schools and divided into oppressors, the hated whites, and oppressed, everyone else. A 4 or 5 year child is brought into the viper pit that is the public schools and either taught that they are an oppressed minority who should hate white oppressors or they are white and evil oppressors.
A 5 year old white child has no understanding of "oppression." They only know that teacher says they're bad, and they don't know what they did, they just want to please teacher. But they are the oppressor, they are bad and nothing they do can make it better.
Until one day teacher tells them that trans and non-binary kids are special and good like the non-white kids, all they have to do is be trans, and they will no longer be hated, but beloved oppressed minorities.
You see, it has nothing to with democrats wanting to diddle kids, the democrats are creating Hitler Youth, they are destroying the cultural identity of children and replacing it with one they can control and manipulate.
It is CRITICAL that the Stalinists indoctrinate children at an extremely young age for this to work. This is why children as young as 4 are targeted.
Yes, you and every drone of the Hive.
AProudLefty
Adorable how loser is screeching for attention. :)
Less than 1% of the population?
If your rant of a claim is true, then they are failing miserably.
Are you aware that some MAGAts are known pedophiles?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
It's the law, Sybil. Get a fucking grip. Read up on Statutory Rape before you support a Pedophile for President.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Germans?
I've learned to only ridicule Sybil and to never try to reason with him for the simple reason being that he's certifiably irrational.
Sybile be cray-cray.
Historically - but grooming has done enormous damage.
{The study found people 13 to 25 accounted for a disproportionately largely share of the transgender population. While younger teenagers were just 7.6 percent of the total U.S. population, they made up roughly 18 percent of transgender people. Likewise, 18- to 24-year-olds made up 11 percent of the total population but 24 percent of the transgender population.}
Report Reveals Sharp Rise in Transgender Young People in the U.S. (Published 2022)
New estimates based on C.D.C. health surveys point to a stark generational shift in the growth of the transgender population of the United States.
Grooming works - as Pavlov showed - as Hitler showed - as democrats show.
Sadly not.
I'm aware of your 12b violation.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Disagreed, but feel free to report it and see what Damo thinks.
BTW, Matt Gaetz is a MAGAt and he's a pedophile just like the Pedo President.
Does it matter? No elective life altering surgery for children. I think we can all agree on this.
Let's say your 16 year old daughter wants her breasts removed... should you be the one to make that irreversible decision for her, or would it be okay for her to have to wait until she turns 18 (possibly 19 I think) to get it done?
AProudLefty
Adorable how loser is screeching for attention. :)
I agree that they should wait on mastectomy.
The claim that it's being done on "children" is misleading.
Right up until the moment that someone makes a comment about how good looking a girl is from that age group, then they are "children" all day long and twice on Easter. To me they are still too young to make these kinds of permanent life altering decisions and nobody should make such a decision in their behalf.
Anyone in their minority... It should be that nobody can make such a decision on the behalf of anyone in their minority years. They will just have to wait for surgeries and medical intervention until they are old enough to make such decisions on their own.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Ever? Again, I'm against blanket laws. Consider a psych research paper I read several years ago where a boy suffered a life-altering surgical accident during circumcision. After discussion with parents, it was decided to castrate him and raise him as a girl. The paper only covered up to age 9, IIRC. With a blanket law against "life-altering surgery", not only would this procedure not be allowed but it would probably ban circumcision. That runs into religious issues too.
Again, although MAGAts and LWLs see the world in Black & White, realistic people see it as a world of Grays with Black and White being the extremes.
As for the scenario, I'm against allowing optional sex change operations for minors. It becomes fuzzier if the girl asks for estrogen suppressors. More so if she asks for testosterone injections.
Circumcision is rarely life altering, and for some it is not elective. You are getting into religious freedoms and I think the argument is a bit weak. Pointing out a rare exception during some other procedure that has nothing to do with this topic doesn't change what we are actually talking about.
As for what happened to the kid... I can tell you what happened to the twin who was raised as a girl after such an accident. The guy doing the "research" (sick man, seriously sick, abusively so, he had them acting out sex acts with the other in his office kind of sick) kept records all the way up until puberty, called it a "great success" however he was a suicidal teen, the kid found out, was seriously shocked as they had "felt different" all their lives, got the surgery "reversed" and later wound up killing himself. Gender isn't a "social construct" even being raised as 100% girl didn't make that kid okay with what happened to him.
Here's a link...
Health Check: The boy who was raised a girl
The incredible story of the boy who was raised as a girl after a tragic accident burnt off his penis.
www.bbc.com
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Not a weak argument if you pass a blanket law banning "life altering surgery". You blinked, Damo. Why not agree with me that blanket laws are authoritarian and anti-libertarian?
Some kids are shocked to find out they are adopted. Yes, as you described, it sounds perverted.
Here's a link to the story of "David" who was formerly "Brenda"... without the additional data I provided about the sicko who called himself a "doctor" and used this as a "test case" for transgenderism. They still cite him in books on the subject as "it was a success"... It wasn't.
Health Check: The boy who was raised a girl
The incredible story of the boy who was raised as a girl after a tragic accident burnt off his penis.
www.bbc.com
AProudLefty
Adorable how loser is screeching for attention. :)
If there was a case against circumcision, this would be it.
It is a weak argument. When you have to go outside of the subject at hand to find some odd case that is an exception to a rule, you've lost the argument. Once there is damage that happens, making medical decisions is no longer "elective" though I am sure David would have loved having the option of plastic surgery on his burned penis to restore it to a more normal appearance rather than having to go through the torture of Dr. Money and his sick perversions.