How do you determine who is illegal?

ExpressLane said:
I'm not sure what state you live in but in Texas it is a misdemeanor to drive without a valid driver's license on your person. And it is also against the law to fail to give your correct name and date of birth when asked to buy the police. If you have a warrant at the time the penalty is increased.
Click to expand...
It is not against the law to remain silent. You have that right.
 
volsrocks said:
From a real law firm

leppardlaw.com

Improper Entry by Illegal Immigrants - Leppard Law - Top Rated Orlando DUI Lawyers & Criminal Attorneys in Orlando

ON THIS PAGE: Understanding Improper Entry by Illegal Immigrants Common Methods of Illegal Entry Penalties for Improper Entry Special Cases: Marriage and Commercial Enterprise Fraud What is improper entry by illegal immigrants? What are the penalties for improper entry? What constitutes marriage...
leppardlaw.com leppardlaw.com
Click to expand...
You are trusting some guy's legal advertisement as a source? No wonder you voted for trump, you are a fucking idiot.
 
Jarod said:
Illegal immigration is not bank robbery.

This has strayed from my point, in order to round masses such as trump talked about pre-election, one would need to violate many long held principals that we hold dear. I know it was mostly just campaign hyperbole, but why do idiots fall for that so easily?

That is the point.
Click to expand...

It is costing the Taxpayers 708 Billion Dollars... PER YEAR!

No bank robbery has ever netted a Billion Dollars.

-
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I'm not suggesting in the least police start randomly stopping people walking down the sidewalk, going door-to-door, or anything like that. If in the course of your normal business in public you have reason to need identification to do something, we should make the requirement that it be a Real ID. If a state wants to issue non-Real ID to illegals and let them drive in that state, more power to them. They can do that. If a state doesn't want to play along, the federal government should withhold funding in general because that state is really shielding criminals and should be made to enforce the laws like everybody else is doing.

Imagine this: A state starts refusing to respond to bank robberies. The state claims that's a federal responsibility and they want no part in that. That is EXACTLY what a sanctuary city, state, whatever, is doing. It is selectively enforcing laws and ignoring those it doesn't like. We shouldn't put up with anyone or government entity refusing to enforce the laws as written.

So, while immigration is a federal responsibility, like bank robbery, state and local government should be helping to enforce those laws and one way to do that is when in the course of normal business they have reason to suspect someone is here illegally, they have a duty to try and determine whether that is the case or not and assist the federal government in the arrest of such persons for the crime(s) they've committed.
Click to expand...
Even worse, to use your simile, is not only refusing to respond to bank robberies, but actively protect bank robbers from the feds.

It is the same with those that willingly violate immigration law. Every single one of these officials and businesses should be prosecuted under the fullest extent of the law.
 
Jarod said:
where do you want me to start?

The 5th Amendment or 14th Amendment due process clause?
Click to expand...
Who is saying they shouldn't get due process?

You have to prove you are a citizen for many things. You have to show ID for many things. For some reason you marxists are against people providing proof showing who they are.

You have no problem with our country being invaded?

I mean how many oranges can you possibly eat? Can't your kids go work in those orange groves for spending money? Builds character
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top