How the climate change denial machine works and how it is funded

archives said:
And above I provided NASA's definition of climate change,
Click to expand...
NASA never defined 'climate change'.
archives said:
I'll got with that one,
Click to expand...
What one? NASA never defined 'climate change'.
archives said:
they put a man on the moon,
Click to expand...
Irrelevant. NASA never defined 'climate change'.
archives said:
that is enough proof to me they kinda know what they are doing
Click to expand...
Not a proof or a definition.

Please define 'climate change'.
Describe the 'greenhouse effect' without violating either the 1st or 2nd laws of thermodynamics or the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
 
archives said:
But common sense does, you keep regurgitating an aborted weird version of solipsism to deflect off of the obvious

And above I provided NASA's definition of climate change, I'll got with that one, they put a man on the moon, that is enough proof to me they kinda know what they are doing
Click to expand...

Same old bollocks over and over, so yet again I will remind you of the open letter sent to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden back in 2012 by 49 ex-personnel, including many of the top names that worked on the Apollo project, criticising the overt political stance taken by NASA GISS.

You're like a broken record Arsecheese, your needle is stuck in the groove, somebody give him a nudge!

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_1418017

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_1418017
 
archives said:
But common sense does, you keep regurgitating an aborted weird version of solipsism to deflect off of the obvious

And above I provided NASA's definition of climate change, I'll got with that one, they put a man on the moon, that is enough proof to me they kinda know what they are doing
Click to expand...

NASA GISS had nothing to do with Apollo, doddering old fool.
 
remember that study that showed Most scientists believed in the validity of global warming?


that study showed that corporate America does too


they didn't PAY for studies that used the premise that GW was not real


This tells even republican idiots that all the people they admire most FUCKING RICH ASSED CEOS would NOT WASTE MONEY on a study that began with untruths


base a study on bad info and you get bad output that is useless


The CEOs don't want useless results


Not one of the studies that corporate America pays good money for to find real results based their study on a set of facts that INCLUDED that GW was fake


ONLY idiots fall for this bullshit denier shit


CEOs don't


Scientists DONT


and even Russia doesn't


its propaganda for the brain dead
 
now who is paying off the sociopathic scientists to deny GW


4 in 100 people are sociopaths


4 percent of scientists are sociopaths


ask your self


is it more reasonable to think 3% of scientists got paid off to lie



OR


is it more reasonable to believe 97% of scientists got paid off the lie abut GW?
 
Only a brain addled fuck would think 97% of any population was Purchased and not the 3 %


for one fucking thing they greedy fucks paying would have to pay TOO MUCH to make it worth it
 
evince said:
now who is paying off the sociopathic scientists to deny GW


4 in 100 people are sociopaths


4 percent of scientists are sociopaths


ask your self


is it more reasonable to think 3% of scientists got paid off to lie



OR


is it more reasonable to believe 97% of scientists got paid off the lie abut GW?
Click to expand...

I believe its the 97% lying. the agw lie is a global totalitarian power grab and nothing more.
 
so tell us all ypu idiot deniers


how much of the oil company profits would make it worth paying off 97% of the entire worlds population of scientists ?


far too much to make it profitable


so tell us all who and how much is creating a situation you claim exists


you right wing voters are just the most gullible walking shit bricks ever
 
AssHatZombie said:
I believe its the 97% lying. the agw lie is a global totalitarian power grab and nothing more.
Click to expand...

so you believe 97% of the population is buyable ?

sounds like a message straight out of the brain of a sociopath


sociopaths look into their own hearts and see nothing but darkness


they assume all hearts are as dark as their own


this is why they will NEVER control the world


they don't understand those they attempt to control


bad information in means bad results out


Just like the CEOS who refuse to pay for science that would be worthless to them in deciding something


ypur brain pays non stop for bad information


you are incapable of understanding humans


you are broken inside


It makes you unavoidably WEAK

you are physically incapable of controlling the human population
 
evince said:
so tell us all ypu idiot deniers


how much of the oil company profits would make it worth paying off 97% of the entire worlds population of scientists ?


far too much to make it profitable


so tell us all who and how much is creating a situation you claim exists


you right wing voters are just the most gullible walking shit bricks ever
Click to expand...

it's not oil companies paying the 97%. doy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top