How the climate change denial machine works and how it is funded

There is nothing "scientific" about NASA. NASA is a government agency. Government agencies are not science.

:rofl2:

"The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA, /ˈnæsə/) is an independent agency of the United States Federal Government responsible for the civilian space program, as well as aeronautics and aerospace research."
 
After the Reagan Library burns to a crisp, MAYBE then the right wing anti-science morons will take climate change seriously.
 
EVERYBODY....

Read this post for a good laugh...

There is nothing "scientific" about NASA. NASA is a government agency. Government agencies are not science.

** Now, make note of the bolded words within the definition that tff posted...

:rofl2:

"The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA, /ˈnæsə/) is an independent agency of the United States Federal Government responsible for the civilian space program, as well as aeronautics and aerospace research."

** I told him that NASA is a government agency.
** He responded by laughing at me, then he copy and pasted a definition from Wikipedia without noting where he got that definition from, which says (and he obviously didn't realize it) that NASA is precisely what I said it is.

WOW. Just... WOW.

This is how y'all can tell that one has lost ALL ability to think for his/her self and lost all ability to form their own arguments...

Sad.
 
After the Reagan Library burns to a crisp, MAYBE then the right wing anti-science morons will take climate change seriously.

Bigotry Fallacy.
Insult Fallacy.
Inversion Fallacy.
Buzzword Fallacy.

Define "climate change". You've been speaking Liberal for so long that you've seemingly forgotten the English language. In the English language, words hold meaning.
 
That "the current warming trend is of particular significance because most of it is extremely likely (greater than 95 percent probability) to be the result of human activity since the mid-20th century and proceeding at a rate that is unprecedented over decades to millennia."

FACTS:

Nitrogen -- N2 -- 78.084%
Oxygen -- O2 -- 20.9476%
Argon -- Ar -- 0.934%
Carbon Dioxide -- CO2 -- 0.0314%
Neon -- Ne -- 0.001818%
Methane -- CH4 -- 0.0002%
Helium -- He -- 0.000524%
Krypton -- Kr -- 0.000114%
Hydrogen -- H2 -- 0.00005%
Xenon -- Xe -- 0.0000087%
Ozone -- O3 -- 0.000007%
Nitrogen Dioxide -- NO2 -- 0.000002%
Iodine -- I2 -- 0.000001%
Carbon Monoxide -- CO -- trace
Ammonia -- NH3 -- trace

29% of Earth is land mass. Of that 29% humans occupy less than 1% of that area. Of the remaining 28% about 40% is pure wilderness. 14% is true desert and 15% has desert like characteristics. 9% is Antarctica. Most of the remaining 22% are agricultural areas. There may be other areas with a human footprint of some kind.

The notion that man is causing the planet to heat up based on CO2 that amounts to less than 1% of the gas in oxygen can only be believed by morons. :rolleyes:
 
EVERYBODY....

Read this post for a good laugh...



** Now, make note of the bolded words within the definition that tff posted...



** I told him that NASA is a government agency.
** He responded by laughing at me, then he copy and pasted a definition from Wikipedia without noting where he got that definition from, which says (and he obviously didn't realize it) that NASA is precisely what I said it is.

WOW. Just... WOW.

This is how y'all can tell that one has lost ALL ability to think for his/her self and lost all ability to form their own arguments...

Sad.

:lolup:

science.nasa.gov
 
:rofl2:

"The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA, /ˈnæsə/) is an independent agency of the United States Federal Government responsible for the civilian space program, as well as aeronautics and aerospace research."

Don't see science anywhere in that statement. Government agencies are not science. You should probably look at NASA's current mission statement.

NASA 2019 mission statement said:
Drive advances in science, technology, aeronautics, and space exploration to enhance knowledge, education, innovation, economic vitality and stewardship of Earth

They are not driving any advances in science or technology.. Their aeronautics 'research' consists of an airfoil library (that hasn't changed in decades), their 'space exploration' can't even get off the ground (they have to hitch a lift from the Russians!), the remainder is just another way of saying 'we support the Church of Green and the Church of Global Warming'.

NASA is a government agency. Science is not any kind of agency, political group, university, scientist, or group of scientists. It is just the falsifiable theories themselves.

You need to come to terms with the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. You so far have not been unable to describe the 'greenhouse effect' without violating one or more of these laws.
 
Don't see science anywhere in that statement. Government agencies are not science. You should probably look at NASA's current mission statement.



They are not driving any advances in science or technology.. Their aeronautics 'research' consists of an airfoil library (that hasn't changed in decades), their 'space exploration' can't even get off the ground (they have to hitch a lift from the Russians!), the remainder is just another way of saying 'we support the Church of Green and the Church of Global Warming'.

Space exploration is not scientific? Maybe you should wait until you are 18 to post to the internet.
 
Without science, nothing could escape Earth's gravitational pull in the first place. Magellan never made it into outer space.

Gravity is not science. It is simply gravity. We simply accept that it exists.
Ferdinand Magellan never made it to space. The Magellan probe to Venus did though. That was not science. It was simply a trip to Venus. It used the laws of thermodynamics, various theories of molecular bonding (part of chemistry), Kepler's laws, Newton's Law of gravitational attraction, and Newton's law of motion to travel there. Those laws are science, not the trip itself.

Other than Kepler's laws, you use the same laws when you drive your car or ride a bus.
 
NASA does not lie.
Yes it does.
They are wedded to facts and data.
They have no facts or data about the temperature of the Earth. Learn what 'fact' means. It does not mean 'Universal Truth'. They have no data about the temperature of the Earth. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. We don't have enough thermometers.
They are thoroughly and utterly a scientific endeavor.
No. They are not. They are not God either. They are a government agency. Nothing more.
 
Back
Top