You can take or not take what you want. Facts don't care nor do they change based on your acceptance or denial of them.
I Agree With The Founders About Healthcare
- Thread starter Robo
- Start date
You can take or not take what you want. Facts don't care nor do they change based on your acceptance or denial of them.
They play obtuse as a tactic.
No, this is a sea-lioning tactic that Conservatives use because they can't form a coherent argument about why the General Welfare clause wouldn't apply to health care.
Do some reading on what "right-to-work" means, asshole.
It means your boss can fire you for whatever reason, or for no reason at all.
For instance, if I sent your boss all these racists posts you make on company time, your boss could terminate your employment, but not tell you why.
That's "right-to-work".
And if your boss did that, who would then pay for your health care?
You mean like the tactic to claim anything you're unwilling to do should be the responsibility of the government?
What's becoming clear is that you make up shit about yourself because you think it lends credibility to an argument that has no objective credibility, then you bristle and whine and screech when asked to verify any of the wild claims you make about yourself.
Then you go and change your story, inadvertently committing an unforced error by revealing you are one of the people who has someone else pay for their health care.
Fact is, your boss could fire your lazy, racist ass any time he wants, for any reason he wants, or for no reason at all. That's what "right-to-work" means, you fucking loser.
So if I sent all your racist posts that you made on company time to your boss, he could fire your lazy ass and not tell you why. Because that's his right.
Who would pay for your health care then?
"G-e-n-e-r-a-l W-e-l-f-a-r-e" doesn't spell "H-e-a-l-t-h-c-a-r-e".
What's clear is you continue to make statements you simply don't understand how foolish they are when you make them.
I have things that are part of the compensation received that you can only dream of and beg having.
No, it's based on the fact that you live in a state with "right to work" laws, which gives your employer the power to fire you without cause at any time.
So if I were to find out who your boss is and then send them all the racists posts you made on company time, your boss could fire your ass and not give you a reason why. Then who would pay for your health care, moocher?
This is the most moronic leftist claim on the planet. You're too stupid to comprehend how lame that is. Dunce. 
What did I say before? That you would basically argue that I should take your word for it that your boss couldn't fire you at any time, despite living in a state where labor laws allow him to do so:
So you say your boss pays for your health care, you also say that it's an impossibility that your boss could fire your lazy, racist ass at any time. So you say two things that are unverifiable on these boards, and I'm supposed to take your word for it? Why?
Well, you keep making up shit about yourself, then you change your story, then you expect me to accommodate that entitlement and take you at your word. Why the fuck should I? You've given me no reason to trust in anything you say.
The fact is that you live in a state where the labor laws make it possible for your boss to fire you for any reason, or for no reason at all, at any time.
Who would pay for your health care then if your boss decided to exercise his right to shitcan your racist, lazy ass?
Old Trapper
Verified User
I would have to take some contention with this argument recognizing that CFM, and others of his stripe, are really too ignorant, and unable to learn, to comprehend what is said. "Right to work" laws simply guarantee that one has the right to a job without the requirement of joining a union. Here in Oregon we are an “employment-at-will” state. This means that either the employer, or the employee, may end the employment relationship at any time and for any reason, unless a law or contract provides to the contrary.
Another question one might raise with the ignorant useful idiot class is why have so many employers dropped health insurance for their employees since the Bush recession of 2007?
Next question would be if the worker has so many rights why is it that approximately 45 Million workers are now working two, or thee, jobs, and still cannot earn enough to provide for their families?
Like you!?!?!
Or like the elderly, children, veterans, and the disabled?
Are those the people you're referring to?
You keep coming back to this fantasy that there are millions of people who simply don't work, yet collect benefits. And when asked to provide actual figures that support that claim, you never do.