I had lunch today with Bill Barr.

Libertarian: Conservative Republican who likes drugs and sex. :laugh:

hey, you remember a LEFT leaning Libertarian by the name of Socrtease?????

I know several left leaning Libertarians as well as Right leaning ones........so what we really have here is just another low IQ leftist, that would be you, making stupid generalizations to deflect from being wrong.
 
Barr was instrumental in the breaking down of the walls between executive and justice branches. He was supposed to be America's Atty and he was instead simply Trump's. He covered up for Trump and was clumsy about it.
 
No Democrat who yelled 'grab em by the pussy', fucked porn stars, and paid them hush money would ever have the slightest prayer of competing for the Democratic presidential nomination, let alone winning it

bill clinton comes pretty close............so i'm sticking with lies, plus, you practically drooled when the FBI brought out the word 'careless' instead of 'negligent' to prevent hillary from being indicted.......

so don't even try it. You loser liberals are every bit as corrupt as the conservatives when it comes to forgiving and forgetting criminal violations of the law if it will help you beat the other side.
 
bill clinton comes pretty close............so i'm sticking with lies, plus, you practically drooled when the FBI brought out the word 'careless' instead of 'negligent' to prevent hillary from being indicted.......

so don't even try it. You loser liberals are every bit as corrupt as the conservatives when it comes to forgiving and forgetting criminal violations of the law if it will help you beat the other side.

Bill Clinton does not come 'close' to Trump, and no rank and file Democrat ever cast a vote for Bill Clinton with the knowledge of his affair with Monica Lewinsky. Clinton was elected in 1992, reelected in 1996, and public knowledge of Monica Lewinsky did not occur until 1998.

That was also 30 years ago in the 20th century. So you are yet again jumping into the way back time machine to find a Democrat to complain about
 
Bill Clinton does not come 'close' to Trump, and no rank and file Democrat ever cast a vote for Bill Clinton with the knowledge of his affair with Monica Lewinsky. Clinton was elected in 1992, reelected in 1996, and public knowledge of Monica Lewinsky did not occur until 1998.

bill clinton had sex with, or sexually assaulted, numerous women during his political career and paid them hush money. You might have read about them.

https://www.businessinsider.com/the...ault-allegations-against-bill-clinton-2017-11
 
Barr was instrumental in the breaking down of the walls between executive and justice branches. He was supposed to be America's Atty and he was instead simply Trump's. He covered up for Trump and was clumsy about it.

Yes, and he believes in that.
 
bill clinton had sex with, or sexually assaulted, numerous women during his political career and paid them hush money. You might have read about them.

https://www.businessinsider.com/the...ault-allegations-against-bill-clinton-2017-11

The title of your own article says 'allegations'.

You are routinely jumping into your time machine to time travel back to the 20th century to track down a Democrat to complain about.

That tells me the modern 21st century Democratic party is largely above reproach and reasonably clean.
 
Maybe, but did he lie about it in official documents filed with the Government?

not the point.........you know this. But I know, you'll sit here and say there was no proof, no indictment, no charges, so it obviously was all lies because it's a democrat. you don't give people of other political parties that benefit.
 
not the point.........you know this. But I know, you'll sit here and say there was no proof, no indictment, no charges, so it obviously was all lies because it's a democrat. you don't give people of other political parties that benefit.

No, I disagree with him. He is wrong and it’s harmful, but I’ll give him honesty.
 
Now tell us, what does Janet Reno have to do with Bill Barr?

Guys like this still get a hardon over Waco. He's the guy most likely to blow up a Federal building. I'm comforted by the fact that the FBI is almost certainly watching him.
 
No, I simply do not agree with your claims about Reno.

I think Reno got bad intel and made a decision based on that bad intel. Either way, Waco is a mecca for the anti-government far right extremists like STY. He needs to be watched very carefully, although I suspect he is too big a coward to come out from behind his keyboard.
 
Back
Top