Holy shit, now you have started a fight.
Holy shit, now you have started a fight.
It sounds like the entire problem again all boils down to one individual acting like a child. It is up to the forum owner to either make another rule which seems silly after publicly scolding that person multiple times or handle it by other means thus solving the issue without the necessity for more hand wringing.@Damocles - I've had Dutch-Dutch on "ignore" for about a year now (he's the only one I've ever had on "ignore") for exactly the reason stated by gfm7175. He was filling my notifications and, on the previous board, squeezing out all the legitimate notifications, i.e. all I had was a full queue of crap. On this board, I am simply saved from his crap.
I would note that I reported this problem several times back on the old board and nobody cared enough to give me a response.
I would say that if everyone just put Dutch-Dutch on "ignore," you wouldn't have to make a rule, or you could make a rule that everyone is to put Dutch-Dutch on "ignore" and you wouldn't have to think of wording.
Both work.
For your convenience, if you decide to make a rule, I'll help you with the wording:
Rule XYZ: Generating phony notifications is a DoS attack that prevents users from full use of the notification system. Doing so is strictly prohibited. On the first offense, you will be incarcerated in a Turkish prison for six months. On the second offense, you will assigned to a Siberian salt mining team for two years. On the third offense, you will be transported permanently to the penal colony Fiorina 161.
hilarious .I would say that if everyone just put Dutch-Dutch on "ignore," you wouldn't have to make a rule, or you could make a rule that everyone is to put Dutch-Dutch on "ignore" and you wouldn't have to think of wording.
Both work.
So that folks are notified abundantly and often only to find that the post it links to has no mention of them. For some, they were getting a ton of notifications only to find they were never quoted... now they are getting notified that they are mentioned but are not...
Regardless, before I have to write a rule I'd just like whatever is happening that does this to end. I don't care how you do it or why I only care that it causes me grief and that folks don't like it. While they can turn off the notifications it makes it so they don't get any notifications when they like going back to the conversation, etc. They don't want to do that.
@ThatOwlWoman as you can see, I've upset Sybil even though he's so mentally whacked that he doesn't realize he's a bigger troll the @Lionfish and all of his socks.@Damocles - I've had Dutch-Dutch on "ignore" for about a year now (he's the only one I've ever had on "ignore") for exactly the reason stated by gfm7175. He was filling my notifications and, on the previous board, squeezing out all the legitimate notifications, i.e. all I had was a full queue of crap. On this board, I am simply saved from his crap.
I would note that I reported this problem several times back on the old board and nobody cared enough to give me a response.
I would say that if everyone just put Dutch-Dutch on "ignore," you wouldn't have to make a rule, or you could make a rule that everyone is to put Dutch-Dutch on "ignore" and you wouldn't have to think of wording.
Both work.
For your convenience, if you decide to make a rule, I'll help you with the wording:
Rule XYZ: Generating phony notifications is a DoS attack that prevents users from full use of the notification system. Doing so is strictly prohibited. On the first offense, you will be incarcerated in a Turkish prison for six months. On the second offense, you will assigned to a Siberian salt mining team for two years. On the third offense, you will be transported permanently to the penal colony Fiorina 161.
QED LOLIt sounds like the entire problem again all boils down to one individual acting like a child. It is up to the forum owner to either make another rule which seems silly after publicly scolding that person multiple times or handle it by other means thus solving the issue without the necessity for more hand wringing.
Not my circus, not my monkey.
@ThatOwlWoman as you can see, I've upset Sybil even though he's so mentally whacked that he doesn't realize he's a bigger troll the @Lionfish and all of his socks.
QED LOL
Fuck you!I've got that IBdamann person on ignore, as well as Legion and his various socks other than LyinFish. If LyinFish doesn't start adding worthwhile content, he's heading that way too. Mostly he's just an obsessive attention whore hot air bag like his daddy, Lesion. lol
Fuck you!
Fuck you!Not interested. Have you checked out IncelDates.com?
If you were part of it, I would have asked you. It's pretty much DU... and no, it isn't just "Legion" complaining.Pardon me for butting in, but who is the target of these complaints? Is it only Dutch? Are others involved? I occasionally use the @ feature too, and it almost always results in a reply from the person who I've tagged. I've seen his posts using the @ to tag people. The @ is always there. If he was deleting it, would I be able to see it?
It's a great tool. I hope it doesn't go away. Maybe it just has a bug in it. Or maybe certain whine-asses just like to bitch. Perhaps you could ask them to post you links to the offending posts?
What, exactly are you accusing me of, Damo? I've explained both publicy and privately what I have and haven't done. Why to you take the word of Legion and his socks, Sybil and his socks plus people like @TOP and @RB 60? Why won't you link me to the offending posts, either privately or publicly? It's like you are deliberately hiding posts of mine that you find offensive.If you were part of it, I would have asked you. It's pretty much DU... and no, it isn't just "Legion" complaining.
Why are Legion's posts not trolling, @Damocles, but you claim mine are? Is it because he's your friend? A contributor? Has so many socks that he keeps your traffic up?Fuck you!
Why are Legion's posts not trolling, @Damocles, but you claim mine are? Is it because he's your friend? A contributor? Has so many socks that he keeps your traffic up?
What, exactly are you accusing me of, Damo? I've explained both publicy and privately what I have and haven't done. Why to you take the word of Legion and his socks, Sybil and his socks plus people like @TOP and @RB 60? Why won't you link me to the offending posts, either privately or publicly? It's like you are deliberately hiding posts of mine that you find offensive.
QED. See what I mean, @Damocles? Why are the posts of these members considered legitimate, but mine are considered trolling?Look, you cowardly bastard. I never squealed on anyone for anything on this forum. Keep me out of your PM/squealing/pissing/moaning/why me bullshit.
QED. See what I mean, @Damocles? Why are the posts of these members considered legitimate, but mine are considered trolling?
Arbie, you've repeatedly lied about me. I never trust an unrepentant liar.
QED. See what I mean, @Damocles? Why are the posts of these members considered legitimate, but mine are considered trolling?
Arbie, you've repeatedly lied about me. I never trust an unrepentant liar.
IIrony
Fuck you!
Fuck you!
Show us on the doll where Trump hurt you.
Fuck you asshole. You supported the assassination of your president elect so, fuck you.
Fuck you asshole. You supported the assassination of your president elect so, fuck you.
Fuck you.