The US has already used them- so we can forget about any reluctance on the part of the West.
The Russians being responsible and trying to avoid nuclear WW3 is being taken as Russian weakness....The Americans continue to think and behave as thugs.....the Russians continue to be the better people.
I agree- the activities of the US-led NATO have been shameful. Putting the European desires of neoNazi Ukrainians over the welfare of Europe- perhaps the whole world- has been crass, egotistical stupidity from the outset. The likes of McCain of course, believe crass, egotistical stupidity to be in America's interests. Many pockets have been lined.
True,...The United States did use them on Japan,....a GOOD thing IMO. It ended the war. But you are comparing apples to oranges by comparing using a Nuke in 1945 Vs using a Nuke in 2024. First,......The U.S had no competition at the time it was used. There was no threat of a retaliatory strike being launched against us from ANYONE. Second,....there was only one method of delivering the payload back then,......by plane. Much harder to do for obvious reasons then ICBM launches from land or sea. Especially by sea. Lastly,......comparing the Nukes available in 1945 to the Nukes available in 2024 is like comparing an old flintlock to a modern minigun mounted on a A-10 warthog.
Those things matter,.....A LOT.
It isn't the difference in competition, delivery or lethality which has a bearing on the willingness of US nuclear aggression- it is the mindset of those in a position to make a first strike. That hasn't changed. There are no changed spots for the US nuclear leopard.True,...The United States did use them on Japan,....a GOOD thing IMO. It ended the war. But you are comparing apples to oranges by comparing using a Nuke in 1945 Vs using a Nuke in 2024. First,......The U.S had no competition at the time it was used. There was no threat of a retaliatory strike being launched against us from ANYONE. Second,....there was only one method of delivering the payload back then,......by plane. Much harder to do for obvious reasons then ICBM launches from land or sea. Especially by sea. Lastly,......comparing the Nukes available in 1945 to the Nukes available in 2024 is like comparing an old flintlock to a modern minigun mounted on a A-10 warthog.
I'm glad the US used the nukes on Japan. My dad was in the Philippines and was preparing to invade Japan. We would have lost a lot of soldiers in the invasion of Japan. We have nukes that are 70-80 times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb.True,...The United States did use them on Japan,....a GOOD thing IMO. It ended the war. But you are comparing apples to oranges by comparing using a Nuke in 1945 Vs using a Nuke in 2024. First,......The U.S had no competition at the time it was used. There was no threat of a retaliatory strike being launched against us from ANYONE. Second,....there was only one method of delivering the payload back then,......by plane. Much harder to do for obvious reasons then ICBM launches from land or sea. Especially by sea. Lastly,......comparing the Nukes available in 1945 to the Nukes available in 2024 is like comparing an old flintlock to a modern minigun mounted on a A-10 warthog.
Weirdo.
Of course you are. You're a genocidal weirdo.
Exactly.
More bullshit from our resident Russian, anti-Semitic troll.Zelensky is no longer president of Ukraine- he is a war-lord. His tenure has ended.
What would Washington- or London/Paris do if a war-lord was striking them with missiles provided by Russia ?
Zelenskyy urges Biden to allow Ukraine to hit Russian airfields to stop Kremlin bombing campaign
Ukraine needs U.S. permission to use ATACMS to hit Russian bases where bomb-dropping aircraft are based.www.politico.eu
You are not a sane person. You are an obsessive compulsive monster with one singular thought, issue, purpose, and position. I wouldn't let you water my plants much less control nuclear weapons.
Are you looking forward to WWIII, Ms. Moon?
Putin made his choice. He invaded a sovereign country. In fairness, hellfire should rain down on your Motherland. Russians should experience the same grief and devastation that they have inflicted on Ukrainians.
You mean appease the tyrant who hopes to conquer Europe? You don't know much about history, do you?
You say this a lot. And I've told you a lot that you're saying the wife's beating is justified because she angered her husband. You are deplorable.
Say the guy that names himself after a pollutant.
We're already in it, you perverted klutz.
Where's the nuclear flashes, Ms. Moon? Over Tehran? LOL