In My Opinion The Only Way.......

Yes! any prohibitive action by others including government are a violation of rights and a worthy and righteous cause for restitution or insurrection.



For honest, informed patriotic people they do absolutely. That leaves you out commie!

Fund the word 'inalienable', dolt, or shutvthe fuck up
 
No deflection, moron. "Fundamental" and "inalienable" were your words. I see you like to cherry pick that Declaration. Love the 'inalienable', gonna ignore that 'creator'. If rights are inalienable, they must transcend human intervention, musn't they?

The 9th says something about inalienable rights?

our rights are inalienable because we are human. end of story. those that want to believe that rights come from a creator are welcome to do so, but rights aren't given by ANY entity, they just are. that is what makes them fundamental and inalienable. Now, you want to cherry pick about words and if they are not anywhere listed, then they dont exist, but that would absolutely have to mean that 'shall not be infringed' means NO FUCKING INFRINGEMENT AT ALL!!!!! But i'm betting that you like your gun laws and would argue against that.
 
(laughing)

More cut and paste from the moron.

If life, Liberty and the pursuit were so inalienable, why was it that those very rights were denied to slaves by many of the very signers of the Declaration? I'll tell you why (again), idiot. Because they ARE alienable and I just proved it.

Flail, fuckwad, flail.

once again you prove yourself the moron of epic proportions we see here on this thread. tell us what slaves were during the time of the framing of the constitution.
 
our rights are inalienable because we are human. end of story. those that want to believe that rights come from a creator are welcome to do so, but rights aren't given by ANY entity, they just are. that is what makes them fundamental and inalienable. Now, you want to cherry pick about words and if they are not anywhere listed, then they dont exist, but that would absolutely have to mean that 'shall not be infringed' means NO FUCKING INFRINGEMENT AT ALL!!!!! But i'm betting that you like your gun laws and would argue against that.

"They just are". Are you fucking kidding me? THEY JUST ARE!!!! Holy shit!

Glad you brought up the gun laws, moron. THEY JUST ARE, before guns were ever invented? Or THEY JUST ARE because guns were thought to provide a first defense against a tyrannical government or invading force in the 18th century?

THEY JUST ARE. So why do countries like Japan, or almost every other nation on earth, not recognize the THEY JUST ARE gun rights? Because, fucktard, they are not JUST ARE. They are creations of government by the governed. Legislative, idiot. NOT discoveries, as you would portray.

Hey, idiot, let me clue you in about "shall not be infringed". Guess what, tard? They are. And even that laughable hero of yours, Scalia, said so in Heller.

Schooled again, halfwit.
 
once again you prove yourself the moron of epic proportions we see here on this thread. tell us what slaves were during the time of the framing of the constitution.

Slaves were property, moron. Not created equal, were they, shit-for-brains?

Let's see. They were deprived of their liberty and, hence, their pursuit of happiness. Many were deprived of life. And certainly, the other right that Locke professed, which Jefferson paraphrased, was property. It appears that people like Jefferson were allowed to possess property - slaves - but not the reverse.
 
"They just are". Are you fucking kidding me? THEY JUST ARE!!!! Holy shit!

Glad you brought up the gun laws, moron. THEY JUST ARE, before guns were ever invented? Or THEY JUST ARE because guns were thought to provide a first defense against a tyrannical government or invading force in the 18th century?
the amendment says arms, does it not? which means ANY weapons. knives, swords, hammers, and yes.....guns.

THEY JUST ARE. So why do countries like Japan, or almost every other nation on earth, not recognize the THEY JUST ARE gun rights? Because, fucktard, they are not JUST ARE. They are creations of government by the governed. Legislative, idiot. NOT discoveries, as you would portray.
wrong again, moron. unlike all the other countries of the world, WE THE PEOPLE wrote the constitution that created the government. the government did not create the bill of rights, we the people did. not through a legislative body either, but through selected representatives at the constitutional convention. i'm amazed you've survived this long with such an aberrant rendition of historical facts.

Hey, idiot, let me clue you in about "shall not be infringed". Guess what, tard? They are. And even that laughable hero of yours, Scalia, said so in Heller.
and it's because of slave loving statists like yourself, that this is even possible. The inalienable and uninfringable right still exists. It's just that you're sorry excuse for a human being is happy that the government is doing such.

Schooled again, halfwit.
you were, indeed, schooled again. let me know when you want to learn more about the constitution you seem to revile.
 
Slaves were property, moron. Not created equal, were they, shit-for-brains?

Let's see. They were deprived of their liberty and, hence, their pursuit of happiness. Many were deprived of life. And certainly, the other right that Locke professed, which Jefferson paraphrased, was property. It appears that people like Jefferson were allowed to possess property - slaves - but not the reverse.
you seem to know that property cannot have inalienable rights, but are too shit for brained stubborn and stupid to acknowledge how wrong you are.
 
the amendment says arms, does it not? which means ANY weapons. knives, swords, hammers, and yes.....guns.

wrong again, moron. unlike all the other countries of the world, WE THE PEOPLE wrote the constitution that created the government. the government did not create the bill of rights, we the people did. not through a legislative body either, but through selected representatives at the constitutional convention. i'm amazed you've survived this long with such an aberrant rendition of historical facts.

and it's because of slave loving statists like yourself, that this is even possible. The inalienable and uninfringable right still exists. It's just that you're sorry excuse for a human being is happy that the government is doing such.

you were, indeed, schooled again. let me know when you want to learn more about the constitution you seem to revile.

(laughing)

I'm still trying to get over the laughable "THEY JUST ARE" bullshit and then you show your complete ignorance about the Second Amendment. Knives? Hammers? Swords? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME???? NOBODY can be that ignorant about the origin of the Second.

Buy a clue, idiot. "We" IS the government, whether a moron like you is able to recognize that. Our representatives are "WE". That's EXACTLY who wrote the B of R and the Constitution. A "legislative body" IS a set of "selected representatives". How fucking illiterate are you?

I see you can't argue the problem of the slave issue, where they were deprived of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness by the very author and signers of the Declaration. Do you know what cognitive dissonance is, moron?

You got schooled again, idiot. On every point. Keep flailing. It's amusing to watch.
 
Last edited:
you seem to know that property cannot have inalienable rights, but are too shit for brained stubborn and stupid to acknowledge how wrong you are.

(laughing)

That's your defense of slavery and that slaves were abrogated of those so-called inalienable rights? Rights that CANNOT be abrogated?

What a fucking idiot!
 
I know, but I love it when leftist morons make assholes out of themselves. the only reason I converse with the asshole in this thread is because TV sucks and he's better entertainment even though he blows.

I love how the "compassionate liberals" immediately go for the homosexual insults, the minute they get their asses handed to them; especially since they have declared themselves the champions of the gay community.

:facepalm:
 
Please reveal my "cut and paste" lying commie!

Other than your cut and paste signature, idiot, you've gone on and on about a creator. A specific cut and paste?

Read the Declaration moron. "All men are created equal and endowed by their creator WITH CERTAIN INALIENABLE RIGHTS and among those rights are LIFE, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS."
 
(laughing)

More cut and paste from the moron.

If life, Liberty and the pursuit were so inalienable, why was it that those very rights were denied to slaves by many of the very signers of the Declaration? I'll tell you why (again), idiot. Because they ARE alienable and I just proved it.

Flail, fuckwad, flail.

Actually commie moron, Our founders were, (like the slaves), born into the slavery culture imported here by the fucking British and taught from birth that people of color were less than human and not endowed with certain inalienable rights and women were actually property awarded rights by their husbands and or fathers. Note the Declaration says "all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights."

The American culture changed, (again by revolution), and shed its absurd notions about people of color and women as property. We became a nation accepting the truth that all humans are created equal relative to how they must be treated by governments and their fellow humans and the word "men" in the Declaration is now accepted by the vast, vast majority to identify all humans.

When you need to know more truths commie, just ask me.
 
Fund the word 'inalienable', dolt, or shutvthe fuck up

It's nicely used in the Declaration which is the cause, the why, the principles for this nation and the reason for the rule of law the Constitution commie.

When you need to know more truths, just ask me commie. I have ALL of the truthful answers.
 
I love how the "compassionate liberals" immediately go for the homosexual insults, the minute they get their asses handed to them; especially since they have declared themselves the champions of the gay community.

:facepalm:

The greatest humor of this thread is the village moron can't muster a single ally to back his moronic ass up in this thread. the lowest life leftist are even ignoring his fucking clueless absurdities.
 
Actually commie moron, Our founders were, (like the slaves), born into the slavery culture imported here by the fucking British and taught from birth that people of color were less than human and not endowed with certain inalienable rights and women were actually property awarded rights by their husbands and or fathers. Note the Declaration says "all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights."

The American culture changed, (again by revolution), and shed its absurd notions about people of color and women as property. We became a nation accepting the truth that all humans are created equal relative to how they must be treated by governments and their fellow humans and the word "men" in the Declaration is now accepted by the vast, vast majority to identify all humans.

When you need to know more truths commie, just ask me.

You just said absolutely nothing, idiot. That you would equate the aristocracy of most of the founders with true slavery is abominable. You are are a true idiot and ignoramus. My 4 year old grandson has a better understanding of these concepts than you.

Have someone drain your drool cup, idiot.
 
The greatest humor of this thread is the village moron can't muster a single ally to back his moronic ass up in this thread. the lowest life leftist are even ignoring his fucking clueless absurdities.

Why do you need allies, tard? Can't stand on your own two feet?
 
Back
Top