So? Everything is part of nature.
Is a Public Philosophy Still Possible?
- Thread starter Hume
- Start date
You insist on pulling things out of your ass. My question is how did they get there?
How did what get where?
Kant tells us it's about pleasure.
I see. You again embarrass yourself by proving you know nothing about Kant. Back to you being an asshole.
Yeah, I don't actually know myself if Phi has any basis in physical reality and ontology, or whether it's a curious mathematical relationship that is embedded in the Fibonacci sequence.
The Fibonacci numbers themselves are definitely found in natural phenomena, though nobody really knows what that means, though speculations abound.
I added Phi to your list of irrational numbers. My contribution to your thread.
My thread.
Obtenebrator
Verified User
LOL. Thanks for FINALLY accepting my position. Gosh that took a long time. But I get it, your ego was threatened and you had to process what I've been saying over and over and over again.
It's probably time you wined to the mods to ban me from THIS thread since I've pointed this out.
My bad. It was Cypress who set you straight.
Obtenebrator
Verified User
How does it move the conversation forward? We hadn't even finished with pi.
You are a babbling buffoon.
Obtenebrator
Verified User
In the VERY same way that it is part of nature to accept that a thing is what it is and not some other thing.
This is a basic. A given.
For some reason we have "thinkers" on this forum who seem to demand that these relationships (like Pi) be DEFINED by some external intelligence rather than simply being what they are.
Obtenebrator
Verified User
Now the insults start. This is how it always goes.
Push either Hume or Cypress into a corner and you will be met NOT with reasoned argument or debate but with insults and persecution complexes.
It shows that math and nature are hand in hand.
Obtenebrator
Verified User
And what does that actually mean?
Nature and math have a better chance at survival when they evolve.
CIA TOTALITARIANISM
Verified User
liberty results from fighting for what is right.
'might makes right' is actually a wrong philosophy.
ONly a righteous violence guided by reason and morality is just.
Obtenebrator
Verified User
Well, now you're just stringing words together.
Care to explain what you mean by math "evolving"? And how does that get at the essence of what mathematical statements actually mean?
It's been a while since I read about the golden ratio and if or where it is expressed in natural phenomena