Is Climate Change Possible Redux

[IBDaMann]

You can measure a sample of gas and it WILL be a measure of a larger volume of gas because gases mix and fill all space they can fill.

Yes. That is the definition of a gas.

Nonetheless, gases are not evenly distributed. You cannot extrapolate from any sample.

Stefan-Boltzmann has nothing to do with how gasses distribute themselves.

Correct. Stefan-Boltzmann has everything to do with the earth's average global equilibrium temperature remaining unaffected by changes in atmospheric composition. If you examine Stefan-Boltzmann closely, you'll see that it has no "atmospheric composition" parameter. Do you have any idea what that means?

Your religious faith commands you to deny science and believe that earth is able to leverage the mystical, magical superpower of greenhouse gas to violate thermodynamics and/or Stefan-Boltzmann. Your religious faith is very WACKY.

 

[IBDaMann]

So, what somebody thinks they saw becomes reality?

What do the affidavits say? They were eye witnesses. You were asleep the whole time.

 

[IBDaMann]

WTF are you talking about?

You caught ZenMode pivoting and he was successful in confusing you. If you don't bring him back to the subject, he will carry you onto an entirely different and completely irrelevant topic instead just to get you off the topic he cannot defend.

 

[Lao Tse]

Nope. You conspiracy theories are completely separate from reality.

it's all bullshit.

you cant prove otherwise.

you just like green austerity and mass murder.

is Nazi mass murdering liars in charge a possibility?

if you believe not, have you noticed how the world bends over for big pharma, most of which were IG Farben, the German Nazi mass murder cartel?

 

[Lao Tse]

Huh? What are you talking about?

the federal government would not allow glen youngkin to remove non-citizens from voter rolls.

 

[Lao Tse]

What do the affidavits say? They were eye witnesses. You were asleep the whole time.

only neocon globalist dipshits are as dumb as zenmode.

 

[ZenMode]

What do the affidavits say? They were eye witnesses. You were asleep the whole time.

Getting it on the record, again, that this is a response, not an answer to my question.

Trying again....

So, what somebody thinks they saw becomes reality?

 

[Lao Tse]

Getting it on the record, again, that this is a response, not an answer to my question.

Trying again....

So, what somebody thinks they saw becomes reality?

or just is reality.

should eye witness testimony be admissable in court?

or you only like hearsay?

 

[ZenMode]

the federal government would not allow glen youngkin to remove non-citizens from voter rolls.

SUSPECTED non-citizens, not verified non-citizens. There's a difference between "citizenship not verified" and actual "non-citizen".

Georgia just went through the same thing with "suspected" non-citizens on voter rolls and intimately found a total of 20 non-citizens registered to vote out of 8.2 million registered voters.

 

[Lao Tse]

SUSPECTED non-citizens, not verified non-citizens. There's a difference between "citizenship not verified" and actual "non-citizen".

Georgia just went through the same thing with "suspected" non-citizens on voter rolls and intimately found a total of 20 non-citizens registered to vote out of 8.2 million registered voters.

they're non-citizens.

Georgia is a different state.

how fucking dumb are you?

 

[Lao Tse]

SUSPECTED non-citizens, not verified non-citizens. There's a difference between "citizenship not verified" and actual "non-citizen".

Georgia just went through the same thing with "suspected" non-citizens on voter rolls and intimately found a total of 20 non-citizens registered to vote out of 8.2 million registered voters.

let's start with one basic question:

do you believe non-citizens should have the right to vote?

 

[ZenMode]

they're non-citizens.

Georgia is a different state.

how fucking dumb are you?

I'm not so dumb that I would advocate removing 1600 people from voter rolls who are SUSPECTED non-citizens. The difference between Georgia and Virginia is that Georgia actually took the time to verify, otherwise they would be removing legal voters.

 

[Lao Tse]

I'm not so dumb that I would advocate removing 1600 people from voter rolls who are SUSPECTED non-citizens. The difference between Georgia and Virginia is that Georgia actually took the time to verify, otherwise they would be removing legal voters.

that's a different state and a different story.

do you think non-citizens should have the right to vote?

 

[ZenMode]

let's start with one basic question:

do you believe non-citizens should have the right to vote?

Anyway, back to the actual topic.....

Virginia has 1,600 people who are SUSPECTED of being non-citizens on voter rolls. Youngkin, with less than a month before the election, was going to give those 1600 people 14 days to verify citizenship or remove them. It's too close to the election to do something like that. That's something that should be done a year before the election.

Virginia election officials on Monday asked the Supreme Court to block a ruling by a federal judge that would bar them from reviving a program put in place in August by the state’s Republican governor intended to remove suspected noncitizens from the state’s voting rolls.
..........
In an executive order on Aug. 7, Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin ordered state election officials to expedite the use of data from the state’s department of motor vehicles to identify and cancel the voter registration of suspected noncitizens unless they could verify their citizenship within 14 days.

A federal court found that that the database flagged and canceled the registration of at least some eligible citizens and that those voters were unaware of the fact that they were no longer able to vote.

Virginia asks Supreme Court to allow voter rolls purge before election - SCOTUSblog

Virginia election officials on Monday asked the Supreme Court to block a ruling by a federal judge that would bar them from reviving a program put in place in August by the state’s Republican governor intended to remove suspected noncitizens from the state’s voting rolls. U.S. District Judge Patr

www.scotusblog.com

 

[Lao Tse]

Anyway, back to the actual topic.....

Virginia has 1,600 people who are SUSPECTED of being non-citizens on voter rolls. Youngkin, with less than a month before the election, was going to give those 1600 people 14 days to verify citizenship or remove them. It's too close to the election to do something like that. That's something that should be done a year before the election.

this is the topic.

you believe non-citizens should be voting and it shows.

you neocon globalists are getting kicked out with the rest of the trash.

 

[ZenMode]

or just is reality.

should eye witness testimony be admissable in court?

or you only like hearsay?

Eye witness testimony should be admissable, but that doesn't mean it's accurate. Giuliani thought he witnessed magical suitcases of Biden ballots being pulled from under a table in Georgia. He was wrong. What he thought he saw wasn't what was happening. He admitted he was wrong and he's now giving his penthouse to the innocent people he wrongly accused.

 

[ZenMode]

this is the topic.

you believe non-citizens should be voting and it shows.

you neocon globalists are getting kicked out with the rest of the trash.

No, only citizens should be able to vote. Now back to the topic....

Are you ok with Youngkin removing legal voters from the rolls a month before the election?

Virginia election officials on Monday asked the Supreme Court to block a ruling by a federal judge that would bar them from reviving a program put in place in August by the state’s Republican governor intended to remove suspected noncitizens from the state’s voting rolls.
..........
In an executive order on Aug. 7, Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin ordered state election officials to expedite the use of data from the state’s department of motor vehicles to identify and cancel the voter registration of suspected noncitizens unless they could verify their citizenship within 14 days.

A federal court found that that the database flagged and canceled the registration of at least some eligible citizens and that those voters were unaware of the fact that they were no longer able to vote.

 

[Lao Tse]

Eye witness testimony should be admissable, but that doesn't mean it's accurate. Giuliani thought he witnessed magical suitcases of Biden ballots being pulled from under a table in Georgia. He was wrong. What he thought he saw wasn't what was happening. He admitted he was wrong and he's now giving his penthouse to the innocent people he wrongly accused.

but you're trying to stop it from being admitted to this discussion.

should non-citizens have the right to vote?

just answer the question to prove you're arguing in good faith.

or keep being a dodging skuzzball.

 

[ZenMode]

but you're trying to stop it from being admitted to this discussion.

should non-citizens have the right to vote?

just answer the question to prove you're arguing in good faith.

or keep being a dodging skuzzball.

I'm not trying to stop it from being admitted. You and others are are accepting eyewitness testimony, in many cases from a single person, as unquestioned reality, while ignoring all information to the contrary.

On the topic of non-citizens voting (also posted above):

No, only citizens should be able to vote. Now back to the topic....

Are you ok with Youngkin removing legal voters from the rolls a month before the election?

Virginia election officials on Monday asked the Supreme Court to block a ruling by a federal judge that would bar them from reviving a program put in place in August by the state’s Republican governor intended to remove suspected noncitizens from the state’s voting rolls.
..........
In an executive order on Aug. 7, Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin ordered state election officials to expedite the use of data from the state’s department of motor vehicles to identify and cancel the voter registration of suspected noncitizens unless they could verify their citizenship within 14 days.

A federal court found that that the database flagged and canceled the registration of at least some eligible citizens and that those voters were unaware of the fact that they were no longer able to vote.

 

[IBDaMann]

Getting it on the record, again, that this is a response, not an answer to my question.

Getting it on the record that I have answered your question many times in the past. We have also reviewed excerpts from the affidavits, so your disingenuous question should not be asked.

Getting it on the record that the affidavits answer your question and support every statement I have made on the subject.

Getting it on the record, again, that this is a response, not an answer to my question.

Trying again ...

What do the affidavits say?