Is it crazy to distrust the official 911 story?

Just a few more FACTS the lemmings will avoid ..

Two of the hijackers LIVED with an FBI informant in San Diego who introduced them to an FBI Field Agent in order to expose them long before 9/11.

The FBI Agent who knew Bin Laden most and who was attempting to get him arrested, QUIT the agency because he was told to back off .. he left the FBI in frustration, took a job as head of security .. in the WTC Towers .. and was killed there on 9/11.

How did Bin Laden know that there would be 5 wargames going on the same day that would cover their tracks and confuse air traffic controllers?

There are a thousand unanswered questions .. including WHY DID THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION COVER UP, DESTROY, AND REMOVE CRITICAL EVIDENCE BEFORE IT COULD BE EXAMINED, WHICH HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED EVEN BY THE 9/11 COMMISSION.

I keep asking that question but the lemmings keep running.

Even if you believe the towers fell because of the impacts, given their classical indication of implosion, shouldn't the debris have been examined to ascertain that no demolition had occured .. especially given that the fire fighters at the scene reported hearing a series of implosions before the towers fell?
 
challenge argument
lol blackas a panther
what shit school did you go to UofUFO

You, "he who cannot write complete sentences", keep asking me what school I attended .. here's a clue .. I can write complete sentences, I have a degree in Information Technology, I'm an Oracle DBA but I also operate my own business, I'm also a free-lance writer, I was a leader on the national scene on the issue of the fraud of electronic voting, and I've worked for the US Congress in media and communications.

Did I mention that I can write complete sentences?

Your turn dummy :)
 
You, "he who cannot write complete sentences", keep asking me what school I attended .. here's a clue .. I can write complete sentences, I have a degree in Information Technology, I'm an Oracle DBA but I also operate my own business, I'm also a free-lance writer, I was a leader on the national scene on the issue of the fraud of electronic voting, and I've worked for the US Congress in media and communications.

Did I mention that I can write complete sentences?

Your turn dummy :)

big deel so you are one steep up from a cold caller like lori and stupor freak LOFL

get bak to me when you have a mba and becomee and inevestor.
 
Oh sorry Top, I didn't mean to step on your toes there, you go ahead, I am sure you can butcher the english language even worse than I did...and I was trying.
 
LOL A COMPUTER GEEK WHO BELIEVES IN CONSPIRACY THEORIES AND WAIT COMMIC BOOKS. BAHBHAHAH

Excuse me SpongeBob .. I didn't ask you to attempt to write a complete sentence .. which you failed at miserably .. I asked about your schooling.

Surely you can answer that given that I answered your question about mine.

By the way, feel free to paint a picture of your school instead of trying to complete a sentence which will only confuse the hell out of everyone here.
 
black as I bet you subscribe to the National Enquirer along with all your loney ufo buddies. hey those publishers need to make a living too.
 
black as I bet you subscribe to the National Enquirer along with all your loney ufo buddies. hey those publishers need to make a living too.

Let me help you out ..

"Black, I bet you subscribe to the National Enquirer along with your looney UFO buddies. Hey, those publishers need to make a living too."

OK, so that's what you were saying .. in your 8th grade kinda' way.

That's very cute, but this still does not answer the question about your schooling. You've been hounding me about my schooling and I answered your question .. why can't you answer the same question put to you?

C'mon, don't worry about the grammar .. I'll correct it for ya'.

:)
 
I laugh at anyone's schooling that hasn't raised their scope beyond believing in UFO type shit, like I said if you and Dhula don't support the National Enquirer who will.
 
Cypress
Quote:

Originally Posted by Beefy View Post
Not by Bushco. I don't believe the controlled implosion theory, or the missile/pentagon theory. But I do believe that we have been sold a bill of goods, and are far, far away from knowing what really happened.

Cypress:
"Agree."
----------------------

Now I admit to not being very familiar with Mr. Beefy ...but just judging from his belief that "we were sold some bill of goods" may need further clarification....

Cypress, I know for quite some time, here and on other cites...and I'll stick to judgement as him being a left wing moron....

I don't know what the hell bill of goods they both think they we were sold, but the fact that they agree is suspect on its face....]

If you can't get your mind around the FACT that freekin' terrorists hijacked 4 planes and ran 3 of them into buildings and one into the ground, you need professional help.....

If you imagine that this government knew before hand it was going to happen and did nothing to stop them...you need professional help....

If you imagine there was ANY type of conspiracy by this government and the WTC buildings collapsing, you need professional help....

If you imagine that the Commission investigating the attack, just might have left certain things unsaid to protect Clinton's lack of action against terrorists for 8 years and Bush's lack of action for terrorism for 8 months...you might just have a case.....but the real wackjobs go far beyond that ......

but the 'cover you ass' case protecting both Clinton and Bush might have some merit.....

Sandy the Burgler made any enlightenment on some facts unknowable ......
the guy certainly didn't steal from the Natinal Archives on a lark....

As a two-time bush voter, and lover of the iraq war, I'm not suprised you see the world in black and white, and are incapable of seeing degrees of nuance. "You're either for the conspiracy theory or you're against it!"

You lumped me and a whole host of people in with the conspiracy topic of the thread: that BushCo blew up the towers.

I've seen nothing substantive that convinces me of that. However, I do think that BushCo KNEW an attack was coming (that's an established fact) though I doubt they knew the exact location and timing, and they did little to nothing to stop it. It wasn't a priority for them (that's an established fact too).

Why wasn't it a priority for them? PNAC provides some possible answers
 
As a two-time bush voter, and lover of the iraq war, I'm not suprised you see the world in black and white, and are incapable of seeing degrees of nuance. "You're either for the conspiracy theory or you're against it!"

You lumped me and a whole host of people in with the conspiracy topic of the thread: that BushCo blew up the towers.

I've seen nothing substantive that convinces me of that. However, I do think that BushCo KNEW an attack was coming (that's an established fact) though I doubt they knew the exact location and timing, and they did little to nothing to stop it. It wasn't a priority for them (that's an established fact too).

Why wasn't it a priority for them? PNAC provides some possible answers

Just the things you said here are enough to get you labelled a "truther" by the ideological gatekeepers in the media. Welcome to the club, cypress.
 
Just a few more FACTS the lemmings will avoid ..

Two of the hijackers LIVED with an FBI informant in San Diego who introduced them to an FBI Field Agent in order to expose them long before 9/11.

The FBI Agent who knew Bin Laden most and who was attempting to get him arrested, QUIT the agency because he was told to back off .. he left the FBI in frustration, took a job as head of security .. in the WTC Towers .. and was killed there on 9/11.

How did Bin Laden know that there would be 5 wargames going on the same day that would cover their tracks and confuse air traffic controllers?

There are a thousand unanswered questions .. including WHY DID THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION COVER UP, DESTROY, AND REMOVE CRITICAL EVIDENCE BEFORE IT COULD BE EXAMINED, WHICH HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED EVEN BY THE 9/11 COMMISSION.

I keep asking that question but the lemmings keep running.

Even if you believe the towers fell because of the impacts, given their classical indication of implosion, shouldn't the debris have been examined to ascertain that no demolition had occured .. especially given that the fire fighters at the scene reported hearing a series of implosions before the towers fell?


We had an engineer who used to post here who went and looked at the evidence after I posted some sights once. He said he stayed up until three i the morning looking at the evidence and in the end desided something was VERY wrong with the official story. I cant recall his name but everyone was blown away after he made the statement.
 
I laugh at anyone's schooling that hasn't raised their scope beyond believing in UFO type shit, like I said if you and Dhula don't support the National Enquirer who will.

Excellent .. you get a "C", and I would have given you an "B" if you had ended your ignorant question with a "?" and broken your thought with appropriate commas. "like I said,"

OK, how about that schooling .. what are you ashamed of?

What's up with that?
 
keep pretending to be an english teacher while I laugh in your face for believing the 911 hysteria driven by moronsrus.com
 
We had an engineer who used to post here who went and looked at the evidence after I posted some sights once. He said he stayed up until three i the morning looking at the evidence and in the end desided something was VERY wrong with the official story. I cant recall his name but everyone was blown away after he made the statement.

Lots of engineers have come to the same conclusion. Many others are afraid to speak because of professional blowback that may occur.

You almost have to be an American to believe this bullshit, because the fraud is clearly obvious to most researchers not bound by cognitive dissonance.
 
Back
Top