Is it crazy to distrust the official 911 story?

deshtard, you and your bandwagon of ufo believers endorsment of creditbility is not only a non issue with me. ITs fucking laughable that you think I would care. thanks
 
deshtard, you and your bandwagon of ufo believers endorsment of creditbility is not only a non issue with me. ITs fucking laughable that you think I would care. thanks

You obviously do care. You've been carrying water for these fascist fucktards for a while now.
 
Take a look at these films Note the building 7 one with obviously timed explosions.

http://thewebfairy.com/911/demolition/controlled.htm

In the towers notice that what you see is smoke, not fire.

With WTC7 pay attention to the top center of the building and how it caves in first before the building starts to fall. Classic demolition .. center caves in first so the sides/walls of the building fall on top of what was once the roof .. falls into its own footprint.

Demolition 101

But how did they set charges without anyone noticing?

There's an answer for that too.
 
I dont know for a fact that they were demolition but I do know the commission did NOT answer all the questions. I do know for a fact if you try to talk about it people lose their minds trying to call you all sorts of names. I do know that the majority of Americans think there is something wrong with the official story. I do know that is NOT good for America.
 
I dont know for a fact that they were demolition but I do know the commission did NOT answer all the questions. I do know for a fact if you try to talk about it people lose their minds trying to call you all sorts of names. I do know that the majority of Americans think there is something wrong with the official story. I do know that is NOT good for America.

I find it extremely unlikely that Desh, the ignorant party-hack housewife that probably never finished high school, is able to tell the difference between a demolition and a collapse while the rest of the world can't see it.

Thank God we have Desh, now we can get rid of those pesky "experts" and their fancy "peer-reviewed journals"!
 
I find it extremely unlikely that Desh, the ignorant party-hack housewife that probably never finished high school, is able to tell the difference between a demolition and a collapse while the rest of the world can't see it.

Thank God we have Desh, now we can get rid of those pesky "experts" and their fancy "peer-reviewed journals"!

Who said it was just me?

This is just the shit Im talking about Gonzo. Some teenager on the internets calling me names is not going to make the evidence go away. Tell me why the 911 commission ignored building 7 entirely?
 
Who said it was just me?

This is just the shit Im talking about Gonzo. Some teenager on the internets calling me names is not going to make the evidence go away. Tell me why the 911 commission ignored building 7 entirely?

I wasn't on the 911 commission, so it would be difficult to tell you. Nor am I a teenager.
 
I find it extremely unlikely that Desh, the ignorant party-hack housewife that probably never finished high school, is able to tell the difference between a demolition and a collapse while the rest of the world can't see it.

Thank God we have Desh, now we can get rid of those pesky "experts" and their fancy "peer-reviewed journals"!

I'm starting to agree with others .. you've got to be the dumbest person here.

The "rest of the world" does not agree that these buildings melted or fell because of fire or impact, dummy. Nor do millions of Americans agree with that stupidity either.

How does localized fires cause the total collapse of WTC7 in a uniform free-fall way? Try real hard dummy and see if you can come up with a coherent answer.

Let me help you out ...

230806wtc8a.jpg


How does that uniformly melt the supports throughout the entire building?

wtc-7.jpg


Since you're the expert on demolitions .. what does that buckle in the center of the building mean to you .. and the building is already falling, where are the fires?
 
I'm starting to agree with others .. you've got to be the dumbest person here.
Haha. I'm probably the smartest person here...you just don't like that I a) don't give a fuck and b) don't spend more than a couple of minutes on any post.

The "rest of the world" does not agree that these buildings melted or fell because of fire or impact, dummy. Nor do millions of Americans agree with that stupidity either.
Really? I find the only supporters of the crazy conspiracy theory are the random nuts online.

How does localized fires cause the total collapse of WTC7 in a uniform free-fall way? Try real hard dummy and see if you can come up with a coherent answer.
Attacking my intelligence again? Well, the steel being weakened and then the tower collapsing on itself would help, I think....not to mention it is entirely possible (shock shock) for the fire to have spread beyond the point of initial impact.



Since you're the expert on demolitions .. what does that buckle in the center of the building mean to you .. and the building is already falling, where are the fires?
I'm not an expert on demolitions--- which is why I let the experts tell me what happened. Both of you aren't experts either, yet for some reason you have taken it upon yourselves to "show the world".
 
I wasn't on the 911 commission, so it would be difficult to tell you. Nor am I a teenager.

Hmmm you seem to throw insults like a teenager.

So you can condem any idea that there is a problem with the official story yet you dont really know anything about the official story? How very odd.
 
Hmmm you seem to throw insults like a teenager.
I throw insults around as a frustrated adult that cannot understand what is wrong with your brain. It isn't that you are liberal--- I respect many of the liberal posters here....it is just that you are stupid. If you were a conservative or a libertarian I would hate you just as much.

So you can condem any idea that there is a problem with the official story yet you dont really know anything about the official story? How very odd.
No, I condemn people flying in the face of science when it fits their interests and then supporting science when it likewise fits their interests.
 
Back
Top