Fentoine Lum
Verified User
And tempered your comment with whataboutism.
Gee, you're left once again unsatisfied.
And tempered your comment with whataboutism.
Lol, of course it's a liberal thing. What else could it be?
Have you ever seen conservatives advocating for what pedophile enablers call "youth rights?"
I haven't.
It would appear that she did. You have to love the whole Jon Benet Ramsey analogy. I mean they had to go back a whole 22 years to find some moral equivalence to grown men handing dollar bills to an 11 year old boy dressed up in drag
Lol, of course it's a liberal thing. What else could it be?
Honest people, who don't include you, know this isn't a political thing
I can give you examples of con predators like Mark Foley.
Yourbtwo examples involve ADULTS
domtry again. And this time do better. I would hate to have to put you on ignore
I don't recall saying that I wanted to "address the parents", mature masturbator.
Then why post the article fuckhead? The only reason you have left is your usual anal attempt to trash those on the left.
You would go to any lengths to bash liberals no matter how weak and dishonest your arguments. Child exploitation means nothing but nothing to you; you just used it, and that makes you every bit as despicable as that poor kid's parents.
JonBenet is not the only child who was abused like that. You want a more current example? Check out Honey Boo Boo and her lowlife parents... a mother who let not one but TWO convicted child molesters
live with her.
Those idiotic pageants are going on to this day. Honest people, who don't include you, know this isn't a political thing
Have you ever seen conservatives advocating for what pedophile enablers call "youth rights?"
I haven't.
Sorry asshat, I understand how fucking ignorant you are, and how you have nothing, as usual, to contradict what I posted, but it has to do with beauty pageants, period.
Being put on "ignore" by someone as stupid as you would be a benefit to me. That way I would not have to see such fucking idiocy. Hmmm, or does your putting me on ignore have no affect on what I see.
But we have seen "conservatives" exploiting childrens rights, or anything else they think might give them a political leg up:
Honest people, who don't include you, know this isn't a political thing
Pointing out your fallacy is just that
This wasn’t a “pageant”. This was exploitation of a young boy who doesn’t know better and pervy, AIDS riddled fag bots getting off on it. You support it
If you don’t know how these forums function then maybe you are dumber than I thought
How is that relevant to a discussion about men paying a child to dress as a girl and dance for them, mature masturbator?
I'll understand if you can't explain.
Now, let's see if Christiecrite chastises you for politicizing the subject.
How is that relevant to a discussion about men paying a child to dress as a girl and dance for them, mature masturbator?
I'll understand if you can't explain.
Now, let's see if Christiecrite chastises you for politicizing the subject.
What is the difference between paying a child for sexual favors, or even titillation, whether it be a male, or female?
Did I say there was a "difference", mature masturbator?
Wasn't the question dumb fuck. The question was about the grooming of children. Do you have an answer, or not?
Quote Originally Posted by I Love America View Post 20
"It is an amazing sickness leftists have. While I don't agree with these child pageants they aren't designed to groom kids as sex slaves like what is happening to this poor boy by the gay lobby."
Again, then what are they being groomed for?