Althea
Althea told me...........
That's a fact.Blue states pay for the tab for the uneducated white xtian run jesusland states, Fact
That's a fact.Blue states pay for the tab for the uneducated white xtian run jesusland states, Fact
They don't.Why should Texas's votes count more than others?
He'd be shot down like an animal when he tried to hurt a child or rape a woman.In his environment. He wouldn't last long in modern cities.
We have a system that supports rule by the minority. Most Americans don't support the laws rammed through by the minority in the nation. An overwhelming majority in this nation supports common sense gun control. Supports the right of a woman to control her own body. Supports fair tax policy. I could go on. There will never be any meaningful changes, given the current system. Especially given that the dumbest people in the nation seem to have too much control over elections.Polls show that most American support abolishing the EC mess. But can you even begin to imagine the money that will be spent to make sure that that never happens? We could have cheap/free universal health care for what the parties would spend to keep it in place, esp. the MAGAT party. We could have free two-year college/trade school for kids for what they would spend to keep it in place.
There is a reason why they want to keep it, and it isn't for our benefit.
They would count more without the EC due to sheer population anyway. Moot point. We're stuck on stupid for the rest of our lives anyway.Why should Texas's votes count more than others?
You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.Most Americans support this,
I already know you ignore the Constitution.and there is really no justification for elections being decided by the electoral college.
They don't.Why should some votes count more than others?
I don't give a shit if people outside the country don't read the Constitution.People always talk about how candidates will ignore some states without the electoral - but do they understand the irony of that? Candidates literally spend all of their time in a minority of "swing" states right now.
Outside of our country, people do not understand how more people can vote for someone, but they still lose the election. This archaic system was a concession to the slave states, and it's time to move on from it.
Paradox. Irrational.California's votes wouldn't count more. Everyone's vote would be counted equally.
States have no color. California has effectively seceded. It's current form of government is dictatorship. It no longer recognizes the Constitution of the United States nor the Constitution of the State of California.It's time for Red States to secede from the Union. It's just not working for us anymore.
Blatant lie. The Constitution, however, serves also to protect the minority.We have a system that supports rule by the minority.
You don't get to speak for everyone. You are not God. Omniscience fallacy.Most Americans don't support the laws rammed through by the minority in the nation.
You don't get to speak for everyone. You are not God. Omniscience fallacy. Gun control laws are unconstitutional.An overwhelming majority in this nation supports common sense gun control.
There is no right to murder. The child she is killing for convenience is NOT HER OWN BODY!Supports the right of a woman to control her own body.
DEMOCRATS don't. DEMOCRATS want to 'tax the rich' (which is unconstitutional). DEMOCRATS want communism.Supports fair tax policy.
I already know you despise the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions.I could go on. There will never be any meaningful changes, given the current system.
The reason we have the 1st amendment is so we know who the idiots are.Especially given that the dumbest people in the nation seem to have too much control over elections.
DON'T TRY TO BLAME DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD ON TRUMP!Hell...trump panders to them.
States that are solidly locked in by one party are all that way. With a popular vote, it would only mean politicians would stop bothering with parts of the country that are solidly behind their party. For example, a Democrat running for something like Senate or President wouldn't bother with large solidly blue cities.Right now, California gets ignored. Completely.
Why should an Iowans vote count more than a Californian's?
I was just responding to your idiocy with some sarcasm.You really are very ignorant, ain'tcha, son?
If you are so enamored with cavemen, why not just chuck it all and head into the wilderness? Why not live on berries and rodents then clothe yourself in their skins?
states are regional areas. measured in space.Most Americans support this, and there is really no justification for elections being decided by the electoral college.
Why should some votes count more than others? People always talk about how candidates will ignore some states without the electoral - but do they understand the irony of that? Candidates literally spend all of their time in a minority of "swing" states right now.
Outside of our country, people do not understand how more people can vote for someone, but they still lose the election. This archaic system was a concession to the slave states, and it's time to move on from it.
of course....You really are very ignorant, ain'tcha, son?
If you are so enamored with cavemen, why not just chuck it all and head into the wilderness? Why not live on berries and rodents then clothe yourself in their skins?
Why would he do that? More likely he'd try to hide from the vehicles and the noise and/or steal food.He'd be shot down like an animal when he tried to hurt a child or rape a woman.
Exactly.I am truly beginning to believe that nothing short of a revolution will eliminate the electoral college. There's just too much money and power wrapped up in it.
To do so, those states that benefit the most from the EC would have to vote to abolish it. I don't see that happening. Unless we give cattle the vote. Then they would love the popular vote.I am truly beginning to believe that nothing short of a revolution will eliminate the electoral college. There's just too much money and power wrapped up in it.
no it isn't.That's a fact.
Um...only POTUS would be affected by popular vote. Senators are ALREADY elected that way. They already count the regions that vote for their party as in their pockets.States that are solidly locked in by one party are all that way. With a popular vote, it would only mean politicians would stop bothering with parts of the country that are solidly behind their party. For example, a Democrat running for something like Senate or President wouldn't bother with large solidly blue cities.
I'd also bet that gerrymandering by every party would become more extreme to block out areas so they become one-party voting blocks.
you want illegals voting instead.To do so, those states that benefit the most from the EC would have to vote to abolish it. I don't see that happening. Unless we give cattle the vote. Then they would love the popular vote.