John Brennan’s Plot to Infiltrate the Trump Campaign

Wrong
Carter Page was under investigation since 2013, liar
DOJ Documents Show Carter Page Helped FBI Catch Russian Spies
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/chris...-page-helped-fbi-catch-russian-spies-n2444651
Another question raised by these documents concerns why Comey’s FBI would have considered Page to unquestionably be a Russian agent: If Page cooperated with the FBI in 2013 and provided them information that ultimately aided the DOJ’s successful prosecution of a third Russian spy who had worked with Sporyshev and Podobnyy (Evgeny Buryakov), why would Russian intelligence have trusted Page enough to hire him as an asset in a major intel operation directed against the U.S. government and one of its major political parties? Wouldn't Russian intelligence have put out a notice to avoid Page as an unreliable and potentially dangerous contact?
 
David Corn and Michael Isikoff, authors of Russian Roulette, gingerly refer to this anti-Trump spying operation as the “working group at Langley,” an undertaking so outré that even Brennan called it an “exceptionally sensitive issue.”

Since they are engaged in propaganda and stenography rather than investigative journalism, Corn/Isikoff and the Times are content to leave this part of the story fuzzy. As the most crucial period in this debacle — the period that would bring out its unfounded, partisan origins the most clearly — they don’t want to look too closely at it. Better to dispatch it all quickly with the Times’s line, “Intelligence agencies began collaborating to investigate that operation.”

But make no mistake about it: that the FBI and the CIA, on little more than the say-so of a virulent Trump hater like Brennan, were meeting to spy on the campaign of Hillary’s opponent makes Watergate look like a tenth-rate burglary. Nixon, at his most Machiavellian, wouldn’t have thought to form a “working group at Langley” against McGovern. But Obama, via Brennan, did the equivalent for Hillary.

For all intents and purposes, Crossfire Hurricane did not begin in July 2016 but at the moment Trump emerged as Hillary’s rival. Brennan, shortly thereafter, was bringing CIA agents, FBI agents, NSA agents, and an assortment of Obama’s political aides together in one room at CIA headquarters to bat around ideas on how to smoke out the campaign of Hillary’s opponent. Out of these meetings came the plot to infiltrate the Trump campaign.

Notice the timing of all the grooming and entrapment of George Papadopoulos, a twentysomething Trump campaign volunteer in London whom the Australian ambassador, Alexander Downer, suddenly wanted to meet in May 2016 for an evening of sozzled political chitchat. That timing corresponds perfectly with the brainstorming meetings of Brennan’s Langley group.

British intelligence, through various planted stories, has bragged about its role in helping Brennan spy on the Trump campaign. It must have served as the bridge between Brennan and Downer. Famous for greasing the wheels of the Clinton Foundation, Downer was looking for ways to ingratiate himself with what he presumed was the next administration. So he was happy to serve as a cog in Brennan’s dirty machine.

One can only laugh at the sheer brazenness of the propaganda in the Times’s opener about Downer:

Within hours of opening an investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia in the summer of 2016, the F.B.I. dispatched a pair of agents to London on a mission so secretive that all but a handful of officials were kept in the dark.

Their assignment, which has not been previously reported, was to meet the Australian ambassador, who had evidence that one of Donald J. Trump’s advisers knew in advance about Russian election meddling. After tense deliberations between Washington and Canberra, top Australian officials broke with diplomatic protocol and allowed the ambassador, Alexander Downer, to sit for an F.B.I. interview to describe his meeting with the campaign adviser, George Papadopoulos.

First of all, Downer had no “evidence.” All he had was the memory of speculative remarks (the kind anybody following the news could have made) that he had pumped out of a minor campaign volunteer during a meeting he set up, according to the Daily Caller.

The threadbare character of this episode (not to mention the possibility that Papadopoulos might have simply been regurgitating speculation fed to him by a mole) is almost too stupid for words. But then Brennan’s Langley group needed something, anything, to get the dolts over at the FBI to open up a formal probe. Presumably, it was Brennan and other Obama political appointees who participated in the “tense deliberations between Washington and Canberra.” Or did Obama himself get on the phone with the Australian PM to discuss how to break through a diplomatic impasse touching on a matter as grave as the Downer-Papadopoulos pub crawl?

What a farce. But it is an entirely plausible one given the partisan progenitor at the heart of it, John Brennan, whose idea of a normal day at the CIA was to turn its offices into the Clinton War Room.
https://spectator.org/crossfire-hurricane-category-5-political-espionage/
 
I'm sorry,
I'm having trouble getting over the fact that CARTER PAGE WAS A KNOWN RUSSIAN ASSET.


Forget names, the fact that the presidential campaign of a nominee for a major political party--any nominee, any party--would be employing an individual as a SENIOR FORIEGN POLICY ADVISOR who was already known by U.S. intelligence to have had numerous contacts with intelligence operatives from a hostile foreign government.....that absolutely blows my mind.

Should the FBI have been on that like white on rice?

You bet your ass they should.

Why are we even debating this?

Lest I remind you again, these are what prominent Kremlin insiders were bragging about while Page was in Moscow....

russia is not, and was not, our enemy. The 1980's are calling and asking for their foreign policy back
 
FOUR (4) REPUBLICAN Appointed FISA JUDGES

this isn't about republican vs. democrat. Get out of the 1990's. It's about globalists vs. nationalists, and deepstaters vs. outsiders. In case you had your head under a rock in 2016, a vast chunk of the republican establishment was against trump. Is this so hard for you to understand? It means absolute dick that they were republicans
 
Brennan dimly understood that there would be hell to pay if it came out that Hillary partisans in the U.S. government were spying on her opponent’s campaign, making use of opposition research that she had purchased. But Brennan, who was auditioning to be Hillary’s CIA director and choking on his anger at the thought of Trump as president, couldn’t help himself apparently. From April 2016 to July 2016, according to leaked stories in the British press, he assembled a multi-agency taskforce that served as the beginnings of a counterintelligence probe into the Trump campaign. During these months, he was “personally briefing” Obama on “Russian interference” — Brennan’s euphemism for spying on the Trump campaign — and was practically camped out at the White House. So in all likelihood Obama knew about and had given his blessing to Brennan’s dirt-digging.

The FBI’s liaison to Brennan was Peter Strzok, whose hatred for Trump equaled Brennan’s. But even Strzok knew that Brennan was blowing smoke about Trump-Russian collusion. Strzok would later tell his mistress that he sensed the probe would prove a crock — that “there’s no big there there.”

What’s valuable about the Corn/Isikoff account is that it inadvertently provides a picture of Brennan running an anti-Trump spying operation right out of Langley. Even after the FBI probe formally began in July 2016, Brennan was bringing CIA agents, FBI officials, and NSA officials into the same room at CIA headquarters to pool their anti-Trump hunches. To give these outrageous meetings a patina of respectability, Brennan invoked the post-9/11 rationale of interagency cooperation. Corn and Isikoff, obviously supportive of Brennan’s operation, use absurdly sanitized language to describe these meetings, but the shocking political import of them is still unmistakable: ...

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
 
I always have to laugh when liberal liars whine about presumed lying. Or when they are okay with Obama's eight years of lies. ]

That's funny, anytime you see a conservative accuse another individual of lying you just got to laugh, their man is setting Olympian records for flat out lying and their labeling another a liar, beautiful

 
this isn't about republican vs. democrat. Get out of the 1990's. It's about globalists vs. nationalists, and deepstaters vs. outsiders. In case you had your head under a rock in 2016, a vast chunk of the republican establishment was against trump. Is this so hard for you to understand? It means absolute dick that they were republicans

Oh, so when Trump says Mueller is biased against him because he has a staff packed with Democrats the claim is bogus because it "isn't about Republocans and democrats," ain't often you see a conservative admit Trump I'd full of it
 
Brennan dimly understood that there would be hell to pay if it came out that Hillary partisans in the U.S. government were spying on her opponent’s campaign, making use of opposition research that she had purchased. But Brennan, who was auditioning to be Hillary’s CIA director and choking on his anger at the thought of Trump as president, couldn’t help himself apparently. From April 2016 to July 2016, according to leaked stories in the British press, he assembled a multi-agency taskforce that served as the beginnings of a counterintelligence probe into the Trump campaign. During these months, he was “personally briefing” Obama on “Russian interference” — Brennan’s euphemism for spying on the Trump campaign — and was practically camped out at the White House. So in all likelihood Obama knew about and had given his blessing to Brennan’s dirt-digging.

The FBI’s liaison to Brennan was Peter Strzok, whose hatred for Trump equaled Brennan’s. But even Strzok knew that Brennan was blowing smoke about Trump-Russian collusion. Strzok would later tell his mistress that he sensed the probe would prove a crock — that “there’s no big there there.”

What’s valuable about the Corn/Isikoff account is that it inadvertently provides a picture of Brennan running an anti-Trump spying operation right out of Langley. Even after the FBI probe formally began in July 2016, Brennan was bringing CIA agents, FBI officials, and NSA officials into the same room at CIA headquarters to pool their anti-Trump hunches. To give these outrageous meetings a patina of respectability, Brennan invoked the post-9/11 rationale of interagency cooperation. Corn and Isikoff, obviously supportive of Brennan’s operation, use absurdly sanitized language to describe these meetings, but the shocking political import of them is still unmistakable: ...

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...

Why would anyone "read more at spectator.org?"

You are always jumping in with "documentation" on some conspiracy from noted right wing sites, if I showed you an article from say "Mother Jones" that debunked everything you posted would you accept it? Would you "read more?"

What you fail to understand that all these partisan sites, left and right, are framing the facts to support the narrative they are attempting to make
 
Oh, so when Trump says Mueller is biased against him because he has a staff packed with Democrats the claim is bogus because it "isn't about Republocans and democrats," ain't often you see a conservative admit Trump I'd full of it
when prosecutors contribute to a partisan camapaign, that's more then incidental politics
 
Why would anyone "read more at spectator.org?"

You are always jumping in with "documentation" on some conspiracy from noted right wing sites, if I showed you an article from say "Mother Jones" that debunked everything you posted would you accept it? Would you "read more?"

What you fail to understand that all these partisan sites, left and right, are framing the facts to support the narrative they are attempting to make
OP:
Both before and after the FBI’s official probe began in late July 2016, Brennan was bringing together into the same room at CIA headquarters a cast of Trump haters across the Obama administration whose activities he could direct — from Peter Strzok, the FBI liaison to Brennan, to the doltish Jim Clapper, Brennan’s errand boy, to an assortment of Brennan’s buddies at the Treasury Department, Justice Department, and White House
why would you not want to be informed?
Did you know about the Brennan war room? Corn/Ishakoff mentions it in passing in their book as "interagency cooperation" but when you look at the players -the are ALL hostile to Trump; including Brennan.
This was no attempt at a post 9-11 style meeting. This was a partisan war room
AS fleshed it out.

Buld up your knowledge bass,and you can see the spin -either right or left - but never dismiss anything because of the source.

I read WAPO and NYT with a jaundiced eyes, because I know they purvey fake news -
but they are still a prime online source
 
That's funny, anytime you see a conservative accuse another individual of lying you just got to laugh, their man is setting Olympian records for flat out lying and their labeling another a liar, beautiful

Oh, so when Trump says Mueller is biased against him because he has a staff packed with Democrats the claim is bogus because it "isn't about Republocans and democrats," ain't often you see a conservative admit Trump I'd full of it

:lolup: Lying snowflake eruption. Thar she blows!! :rofl2:

WARNING…….Trump Derangement Syndrome.…….WARNING! :rofl2:
 
:rofl2::rofl2:

get the fuck outta here. He was attempted to be recruited, and had business ties..
not a "Russian asset" :palm:

Besides we are now seeing the Brennan shenanigans preceeded even the Page warrant, and the Papa bar brags

Carter Page and Michael Caputo last night...........................

 
It doesn't shock me. They are into overreach, overkill, beyond limits of the Constitution, unlimited range of investigations not just Mullet, but also by any and all inferior little assistant U.S. Attorney mullets he cares to appoint, etc. in every facet of this swampy mess begun by Clinton, Brennan, Clapper, Mullet and Comey.
 
It doesn't shock me. They are into overreach, overkill, beyond limits of the Constitution, unlimited range of investigations not just Mullet, but also by any and all inferior little assistant U.S. Attorney mullets he cares to appoint, etc. in every facet of this swampy mess begun by Clinton, Brennan, Clapper, Mullet and Comey.
yeppers. good description of the Deep State and its "overkill"...
They made themselves into an active branch of power, instead of serving the executive branch's legit intelligence needs
 
yeppers. good description of the Deep State and its "overkill"...
They made themselves into an active branch of power, instead of serving the executive branch's legit intelligence needs

And after all......they needed all those spies/informants because they were only trying to PROTECT Trump. :laugh:

What do think of a 2nd Special Counsel?

 
Back
Top