You have to admit that Perry is very adept at using Google and Wiki.
A fake PhD is going to have to plagiarize or paraphrase the words of real PhDs to attempt to pull off the whole glorious 'biogeochem" PhD act.
You have to admit that Perry is very adept at using Google and Wiki.
How could they do that? They are me, as is Cypress.
You are overdue for listing off my eleven other socks.
LOL. Like you have ever done stratigraphy. LOL. I remember the old days drafting by hand entire columns using those Stadtler pens. And there's ZERO chance you've ever done a correlation of anything let alone a fence diagram.
You're a joke. No one believes you are a geologist. That's why you never say anything geologic. You know you'd have to google it and then you'd be shown up for not even knowing what the words meant.
Agreed. The problem for him was keeping up the persona. He couldn't handle it and broke into anger. `It was his lack of maturity that caught my attention. Highly educated people are a lot more mature and self-disciplined than he was able to consistently demonstrate.A fake PhD is going to have to plagiarize or paraphrase the words of real PhDs to attempt to pull off the whole glorious 'biogeochem" PhD act.
I deny education?
I think you will find it is you claiming that education is just indoctrination, and has no value.
Unlike you, I never claimed to be an expert, but I did take the Electrical Engineering courses when I got my Computer Engineering bachelors degree. I have the educational background to become a licensed Electrical Engineer.
I am sure you feel your elementary school understanding of mathematics and science makes you an expert, but I am here to tell you that you are wrong.
Well, I'm not an electrical engineer. Instead, I'm the guy that calls up the electrical engineer that made the print I'm looking at and tells him "What the fuck were you thinking? This screwed up worse than a soup sandwich! It's gonna be a sea of red fucking ink by the time I get this shit installed. Fuck you very much you goddamned retard!"
You might have to apologize to some electrical engineers for confusing them with poor technical writers.
LOL. I wasn't an oilfield brat like you probably were (assuming you aren't just lying about being a "geophysicist", which I think is more likely). So my sed-strat stuff didn't end up being a huge thing for me. Especially since I wound up working as a chemist rather than a geologist.
Nope. It's how we did it back in the 80's and 90's. You may be too young. As a geologist back in those days you had 3 things of supreme value for you: your statdler pens, your brunton and a nice rock hammer.
(Kudos on the googling).
You are young, obviously. I go tmy BS in '86 so we all had to do our drafting manually. It was before software and GIS. I think it gave you a better connection to the formations. When you have to draw all the little dashes for the shales you really got it in your head this was a shale. It wasn't until about '90 that I had access to a computerized system. It was a crude system written in C for entering in borehole data from coal measures in the Illinois Basin. Took old written well logs recorded by the geologists sitting the wells and it did require a bit of knowledge about the formations and correlations.
Field camp was also mapping by hand on an old Plane table and Alidade. And you drew the maps by hand afterwards.
Those who came before you spoiled brats had to do it all by hand. You wouldn't have lasted even through your undergrad if you had to do it by hand. If you think the Stadtler pens were like crayons that's because you never had to learn that skill.
I am a chemist by career. Geochemist by degree. Sorry you are confused. You wouldn't understand chemistry (as has been shown) so you wouldn't understand how one could make the jump.
You probably just sit wells and data enter. You didn't learn how REAL geology was done. LOL.
Some of us have had the pleasure over the last several months of dealing with a self-proclaimed "biogeochemist" PhD who copy-pastes from Wikipedia. Lucky us. He likes to talk about "organic carbon" ... like that's a thing.
I feel for you.
They are required by law to sign off and put their PE seal on the drawings. They're the responsible party. If their underlings are idiots and the PE signed off on it, it's the PE's fault.
Now you're just boring me.
I don't care about your imaginary 'geochem' PhD, or about your little stadtler pens and crayons you were using in some freshman class.
I spent almost 30 years using advanced stratigraphic, 3d seismic, ArcMap GIS software platforms for stratigraphic, structural, geophysical, and spatial analysis.
I don't have the interest or inclination to hear about your adventures with your stadtler pens and coloring pencils. Maybe there isn't an eight year old here you can regale with tales of your pen and coloring pencil creations. Carry on.
Some of us have had the pleasure over the last several months of dealing with a self-proclaimed "biogeochemist" PhD who copy-pastes from Wikipedia. Lucky us. He likes to talk about "organic carbon" ... like that's a thing.
I feel for you.
You are not a chemist. There is no such thing as a 'geochemist'. You are not a geologist. Stop making shit up about yourself.
You are no geologist. You are no chemist either. You are not a pilot. You are not a psychoanalyst. You are not a computer engineer. You are not an electrical engineer. Stop making shit up about yourself.
LOL. You still don't get it do you? You could (and probably did) google all the terms you put down. But I actually said something that cannot be googled. LOL.
If you are a geologist you probably suck pretty badly because even simple logic evades you.
Incorrect. You do realize that when pretending to discuss chemistry, that C does not come with any XML tags denoting orign or history. All C is equivalent.You do realize that when someone says "organic carbon" they are differentiating it from carbon in inorganics like carbonates and carbides, right?
LOL. I wasn't an oilfield brat like you probably were (assuming you aren't just lying about being a "geophysicist", which I think is more likely). So my sed-strat stuff didn't end up being a huge thing for me. Especially since I wound up working as a chemist rather than a geologist.
Nope. It's how we did it back in the 80's and 90's. You may be too young. As a geologist back in those days you had 3 things of supreme value for you: your statdler pens, your brunton and a nice rock hammer.
(Kudos on the googling).
You are young, obviously. I go tmy BS in '86 so we all had to do our drafting manually. It was before software and GIS. I think it gave you a better connection to the formations. When you have to draw all the little dashes for the shales you really got it in your head this was a shale. It wasn't until about '90 that I had access to a computerized system. It was a crude system written in C for entering in borehole data from coal measures in the Illinois Basin. Took old written well logs recorded by the geologists sitting the wells and it did require a bit of knowledge about the formations and correlations.
Field camp was also mapping by hand on an old Plane table and Alidade. And you drew the maps by hand afterwards.
Those who came before you spoiled brats had to do it all by hand. You wouldn't have lasted even through your undergrad if you had to do it by hand. If you think the Stadtler pens were like crayons that's because you never had to learn that skill.
Plagiarism. You know better than to take the works of others, in this case of King Juán Carlos of Spain, and pass it off as your own.LOL. Why don't you shut up, Sybil.