Judge declares PA voter ID law is invalid

christiefan915 said:
And to make it more clear, I joined the ranks of drivers, students and Costco shoppers and am subject to the regulations of those groups. But the Constitution says my right to vote can't be denied or abridged.


  • 15th Amendment (1870): "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude."
  • 19th Amendment (1920): "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex."
  • 23rd Amendment (1961): provides that residents of the District of Columbia can vote for the President and Vice President.
  • 24th Amendment (1964): "The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax."
  • 26th Amendment (1971): "The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age."
Click to expand...

How does proving who you say you are deny you the right to vote?
 
christiefan915 said:
And to make it more clear, I joined the ranks of drivers, students and Costco shoppers and am subject to the regulations of those groups. But the Constitution says my right to vote can't be denied or abridged.


  • 15th Amendment (1870): "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude."
  • 19th Amendment (1920): "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex."
  • 23rd Amendment (1961): provides that residents of the District of Columbia can vote for the President and Vice President.
  • 24th Amendment (1964): "The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax."
  • 26th Amendment (1971): "The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age."
Click to expand...

Oh such delicious irony, I may need an insulin shot.
 
christiefan915 said:
The precedent in PA is NO photo ID, but I understand your limited abilities find that hard to comprehend.
Click to expand...


Sometimes you have to explain even simple concepts like "precedent" to simpletons like Defective Truth.

His double digit IQ just can't handle that kind of deep thought.
 
Truth Detector said:
That's not the debate dunce; but I will play your brain dead game of deflection right after you show me how requiring proof that you are a citizen impedes citizens from casting their votes and do not enhance the integrity of our voting systems.

The elected legislators in the state passed a law; it is not up to a partisan jurist to decide they cannot pass such laws based on flimsy anectdotal arguments.
Click to expand...


That IS the debate you pinhead.

Partisan Pennsylvanians connived to keep people from voting by cooking up a voter fraud "problem"...only thing is, there is NO EVIDENCE of in person voter fraud in PA, precisely the problem that a Voter ID would supposedly alleviate.

But you go right on ignoring the LACK OF evidence and braying your idiotic attacks and deflections.

We understand it's all you can do at this point, having lost the debate pages ago.
 
christiefan915 said:
:rolleyes: If you're suspicious of everyone who turns out to vote, no form of ID is going to make you feel safe. What if a person has a photo ID that matches his face but the other information on the card is bogus?
Click to expand...

so your defense to the argument we should prevent illegal voters is that it won't work because people will obtain ID's illegally?........tell me again how you feel about gun control.......you know, the part about how we can eliminate gun violence if we don't let people buy guns.......

okay, I suppose its possible that someone might get a fake photo voting ID.....maybe ACORN will make it a cottage industry......but at least we can make people go through that time and expense instead of just letting them run around and do it effortlessly.......
 
christiefan915 said:
And to make it more clear, I joined the ranks of drivers, students and Costco shoppers and am subject to the regulations of those groups. But the Constitution says my right to vote can't be denied or abridged.


  • 15th Amendment (1870): "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude."
  • 19th Amendment (1920): "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex."
  • 23rd Amendment (1961): provides that residents of the District of Columbia can vote for the President and Vice President.
  • 24th Amendment (1964): "The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax."
  • 26th Amendment (1971): "The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age."
Click to expand...

do they have a right to vote more than once?........do they have the right to vote in the name of someone else?.....
 
ZappasGuitar said:
That IS the debate you pinhead.

Partisan Pennsylvanians connived to keep people from voting by cooking up a voter fraud "problem"...only thing is, there is NO EVIDENCE of in person voter fraud in PA, precisely the problem that a Voter ID would supposedly alleviate.

But you go right on ignoring the LACK OF evidence and braying your idiotic attacks and deflections.

We understand it's all you can do at this point, having lost the debate pages ago.
Click to expand...

the blind man guarding the door said he saw no evidence of shoplifters leaving the store......

if you don't ask people who they are you have no fucking clue if the person who voted had the right to vote.......
 
dear fact adverse fucking idiots,



There is NO fraud of the kind these ID laws are designed to stop.

NONE


go get your evidence that this type of fraud is a problem ANYWHERE in this country.


If you can not then you are fucking dullard dupes who are traitors to this country because you want the republican party to STEAL power from the people.


Proof or shut the FUCK up
 
when someone registers to vote they show ID you fucking laying sacks of shit.

they have already proven who they are and now they are merely using their voter card to vote.

they don't need an ID because they have already proven wh they are.

SO YES



they can check and see if people were legal voters after the fact.
 
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/news/la-pn-supreme-court-rnc-voter-fraud-20130114


this is your decades long record of CHEATING voters out of their votes.







Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

January 14, 2013|By David G. Savage




WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.

The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.
 
Your fucking liars and have lied and cheated for decades.

No one with the real facts believes a fucking word you liars say
 
Ishmael Pequod said:
States make voter regulations. There is nothing in the Constitution that prevents them from requiring photo ID to vote. Suck on it.
Click to expand...

and there is nothing in the constoitution that say we have to allow your fucking cheating assed party to cheat people out of their votes so you can steal power from the people .

FUCK YOU


we will NOT take this shit anymore you fucking traitor
 
evince said:
dear fact adverse fucking idiots,

There is NO fraud of the kind these ID laws are designed to stop.

NONE

go get your evidence that this type of fraud is a problem ANYWHERE in this country.

If you can not then you are fucking dullard dupes who are traitors to this country because you want the republican party to STEAL power from the people.

Proof or shut the FUCK up
Click to expand...

evince said:
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/news/la-pn-supreme-court-rnc-voter-fraud-20130114

this is your decades long record of CHEATING voters out of their votes.

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

January 14, 2013|By David G. Savage

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.

The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.
Click to expand...

Wanna talk about election cheaters, desh ? And not from 30 fucking years ago either....
Real cheaters doing real jail time.....REAL DEMOCRATS


8 Democrats Arrested and/or Convicted of Voter Fraud

http://nationwidegazette.com/8-democ...r-voter-fraud/
---------------------------------
12 charged with voter fraud in Georgia election

http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/24/12...rgia-election/
--------------------------------
Democratic officials arrested for voter fraud in Indiana
Names, signatures faked in Indiana to put Obama, Clinton on primary ballot
http://video.foxnews.com/v/249896156...ud-in-indiana/
-------------------------------
Fort Worth woman arrested in voter fraud case
By Fort Worth Star-Telegram (TX) August 22, 2013
http://www.gopusa.com/news/2013/08/2...er-fraud-case/
-------------------------------
7 Democrats Arrested in New York for actual Voter Fraud via Absentee Ballots
Democrats arrested, charged and 4 plead guilty to actual voter fraud in New York via absentee ballots!
------------------------------
NAACP Executive Sentenced to 10 Years in Prison for Voting for Obama 10 Times in 2008
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ng/B8Xe0hnJ-YI
 
ZappasGuitar said:
That IS the debate you pinhead.

Partisan Pennsylvanians connived to keep people from voting by cooking up a voter fraud "problem"...only thing is, there is NO EVIDENCE of in person voter fraud in PA, precisely the problem that a Voter ID would supposedly alleviate.

But you go right on ignoring the LACK OF evidence and braying your idiotic attacks and deflections.

We understand it's all you can do at this point, having lost the debate pages ago.
Click to expand...

Dear shit-for-brains hyper partisan asshat; no one on this forum has shown anything remotely coherent to prove that by requiring ID to vote it is suppressing voters; unless of course you morons want to admit that Democrats must be so damned stupid and incompetent that they cannot prove who they are.

Now do you get it shit-for-brains or do we need to type it hundreds of more times for it to sink into that thick skull filled with leftist mush?

Dumbass; you dunces are well beyond mere stupid and repugnant.
 
christiefan915 said:
I am pointing and laughing at this: "You started a thread on a dishonest premise..."

What, pray tell, was the dishonest premise? The judge declared PA voter ID law to be invalid. That's a fact, not a premise. If you choose to disregard that fact and try to make a case for another interpretation of that fact, have at it but understand that playing fast and loose with the facts makes you look even more stupid than you are.

Now, snap to and explain the judge's "dishonest premise" to your eager students (ha ha) here. We need the laugh.
Click to expand...

Dear dunce; the dishonest premise is that voter ID suppresses voters rights.

God you're beyond mere stupid and repugnant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top