Judge reprimands Trump during his rape trial

Walt said:
She, and many, many other women can, and are saying rape. Their testimony is proof.

One other piece of proof is that even trump admits he does this sort of thing. We have emails sent before the trump tape became public that he likes to sexually assault women, and before the emails were made public, we have trump making a tape that he likes to sexually assault women. When multiple unconnected sources say the same thing...
Click to expand...
When he was raping children with Epstein, he would send Cohen to threaten the victims if they sued.

I don't think he can trick anyone into that job anymore, given that he tossed Cohen right under the bus.
 
christiefan915 said:
Nice attempt to sidestep this info from the article. trump dragged out producing a DNA sample until it was too late. If he has nothing to hide why didn't he provide it three years ago? Then if it didn't match what was on the dress, trump would have had reason to call her a liar, have the case dismissed and perhaps force her to pay the legal fees.

Carroll never sued him for rape because of the statute of limitations. She sued because he defamed her over her accusation. All of trump's actions show he's guilty a f and we both know it.

"Donald Trump missed his chance to use his DNA to try to prove he did not rape the writer E Jean Carroll, a federal judge said on Wednesday, clearing a potential roadblock to an April trial...

The judge, Lewis A Kaplan, rejected the 11th-hour offer by Trump’s legal team to provide a DNA sample to rebut claims Carroll first made publicly in a 2019 book...

Carroll’s lawyers have sought Trump’s DNA for three years to compare it with stains found on the dress Carroll wore the day she says Trump raped her in a department store dressing room in late 1995 or early 1996. Analysis of DNA on the dress concluded it did contain traces of an unknown man’s DNA...

After refusing to provide a DNA sample, Trump’s lawyers switched tactics, saying they would provide one if Carroll’s lawyers turned over the full DNA report on the dress...

https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/apr/26/trump-rape-trial-e-jean-carroll-testify
Click to expand...

If she has evidence of rape, why did she choose to not pursue it?

BECAUSE SHE DID NOT HAVE ANY SUCH EVIDENCE.

I SIDESTEPPED NOTHING; I GOT RIGHT TO THE POINT.

Trump CALLED HER BLUFF, and SHE BLINKED.


SHE IS A LIAR, with rape fantasies.
 
christiefan915 said:
Did you sleep through the #MeToo movement? Maybe you should go back and review all the statements from women about Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby and many other powerful men who took advantage of women.
Click to expand...

Sorry; not buying the refused to report multiple rapes for decades.

NO WITNESSES, NO VERFIABLE TIMELINE.

Same horseshit as Blasey-Ford.

You believe what you want.

SHE IS A LIAR.
 
christiefan915 said:
She has a dress with DNA on it and trump gamed the system to keep from turning in his own DNA sample to see if they matched.
Click to expand...

LOL




And Trump offered DNA and the Judge rejected it


Judge rejects Trump offer to provide DNA sample in E. Jean Carroll rape defamation case. A New York federal judge rejected a conditional offer by former President Donald Trump to provide a DNA sample in a lawsuit accusing him of raping a writer in a Manhattan store in the 1990s.

The judge noted that Carroll would not be entitled now to get a DNA sample from Trump, because the process of exchanging evidence, known as discovery, is completed.

“Her counsel have had plenty of opportunities in both of the two related cases to move to compel Mr. Trump to submit a DNA sample,” Kaplan wrote. “Had they done so, they almost certainly would have gotten it. But Ms. Carroll’s counsel never moved to compel Mr. Trump to submit a DNA sample. They obviously decided to go to trial without it.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/15/jud...rk federal judge,Manhattan store in the 1990s.
 
Last edited:
Althea said:
He's going to settle and call it a win.

As he did with trump University.

As he did with his father when they agreed to make remuneration for their racist housing policies.
Click to expand...

MONEY IS ALL THIS IS ABOUT....SHE MUST BE BROKE.
 
Grokmaster said:
If she has evidence of rape, why did she choose to not pursue it?

I SIDESTEPPED NOTHING; I GOT RIGHT TO THE POINT.

Trump CALLED HER BLUFF, and SHE BLINKED.


SHE IS A LIAR, with rape fantasies.
Click to expand...

Lol. trump didn't call her bluff; he slandered and libeled her and the result is this trial.

Aren't you the man, claiming she had rape fantasies. Comments like this are why so many women keep quiet about their attacks. Get woke already, grokweenie.
 
Grokmaster said:
Sorry; not buying the refused to report multiple rapes for decades.

NO WITNESSES, NO VERFIABLE TIMELINE.

Same horseshit as Blasey-Ford.

You believe what you want.

SHE IS A LIAR.
Click to expand...

Are you okay? Only fundamentalist mullahs preaching Shari'ah law say that a rape has to have four witnesses. Good lord.
 
christiefan915 said:
Lol. trump didn't call her bluff; he slandered and libeled her and the result is this trial.

Aren't you the man, claiming she had rape fantasies. Comments like this are why so many women keep quiet about their attacks. Get woke already, grokweenie.
Click to expand...

She had the chance to produce "DNA EVIDENCE OF RAPE" and failed to do so, and refused to pursue it further,
.
She also had the chance to report her "rape" over 20 years ago, and failed to do so, as she also failed to do with Moonves, after his alleged attack on her in an elevator in the 90's..

All of this is to promote book sales, with her as the irresistible femme fatale...

SERIAL LIAR, reputed to have been promiscuous, in that time frame.

If she has DNA evidence, why did she not present it?

SHE IS A LIAR , is the only feasible answer.

 
volsrock said:
LOL

So thats the ONLY way to get DNA is if someone agrees to give a sample?

And Trump offered DNA and the Judge rejected it
Click to expand...

You can fool someone into giving a sample, like picking up a cup they drank out of. What ways are you thinking of?

The judge rejected the DNA because trump delayed giving it until his time was up. As he well knew when he used that ploy.
 
christiefan915 said:
Are you okay? Only fundamentalist mullahs preaching Shari'ah law say that a rape has to have four witnesses. Good lord.
Click to expand...

And Blasey-Ford showed as that, yes, women will LIE THEIR ASSES OFF, with the proper motivation.

In her case , a FAT GoFundMe account.

Caroll is the same person...
 
Grokmaster said:
She had the chance to produce "DNA EVIDENCE OF RAPE" and failed to do so, and refused to pursue it further,
.
She also had the chance to report her "rape" over 20 years ago, and failed to do so, as she also failed to do with Moonves, after his alleged attack on her in an elevator in the 90's..

All of this is to promote book sales, with her as the irresistible femme fatale...

SERIAL LIAR, reputed to have been promiscuous, in that time frame.
Click to expand...

Are you forgetting that this is a civil trial for defamation, not a rape trial? She wrote about the rape and trump slandered and libeled her. The DNA was just one piece of evidence to prove that Carroll wasn't a liar when trump defamed her.
 
Grokmaster said:
MONEY IS ALL THIS IS ABOUT....SHE MUST BE BROKE.
Click to expand...
All civil trials are about money.

Often it's just punitive, but justice is justice.

This might open the door for his myriad rape victims to step back into the light, provided the statute of limitations hasn't passed.

His bully Cohen is no longer threatening the lives of the children trump raped.
 
christiefan915 said:
It's a civil trial for defamation, not a criminal trial for rape. Hopefully he loses and has to pay her off bigly.
Click to expand...
The beauty of these trials is that evidence is now entered into the record. His financial crimes in NY will unearth quite a bit of discovery to be used at later criminal trials.
 
Grokmaster said:

And Blasey-Ford showed as that, yes, women will LIE THEIR ASSES OFF, with the proper motivation.

In her case , a FAT GoFundMe account.

Caroll is the same person...
Click to expand...

Blasey Ford had witnesses to her attack ICYMI. Kavanaugh's pal Mark Judge even wrote a book about what a pig Kavanaugh was towards women. So how about them apples?

Blasey Ford got death threats from people like you and had to keep moving for awhile, I'm sure that took a toll on her finances.
 
Althea said:
The beauty of these trials is that evidence is now entered into the record. His financial crimes in NY will unearth quite a bit of discovery to be used at later criminal trials.
Click to expand...

Horseshit. All that is "being exposed" is the desperation of the Stalinist democrats, who enacted a law in New York , just so that this suit could still be allowed in court, long after it would have been allowed....JUST TO "GET TRUMP"

Another fucking Witch Hunt
 
Grokmaster said:
Horseshit. All that is "being exposed" is the desperation of the Stalinist democrats, who enacted a law in New York , just so that this suit could still be allowed in court, long after it would have been allowed....JUST TO "GET TRUMP"

Another fucking Witch Hunt
Click to expand...

You've got the trump talking points down, grokweenie. Let's see if they help him at the trial.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top