christiefan915
Catalyst
slandered and libeled her
I thought it was a rape trial
You thought wrong. The civil trial is for alleged rape defamation and battery. Read the link from The Guardian ITT.
slandered and libeled her
I thought it was a rape trial
All trials are "law suit trials". A lawsuit is a case brought before a court for adjudication. Both criminal and civil cases are lawsuits, but it is more common to hear civil cases referred to as a lawsuit. In English, we usually try not to repeat ourselves, so we would either call it a trial, or a lawsuit, but not both.
This is a civil lawsuit stemming from a rape. It can reasonably be called a rape trial, rape lawsuit, or rape civil trial.
Forbes, Associated Press, Yahoo News, Guardian, NBC, Chicago Sun Times --->
"Trump Rape Trial Begins Tuesday—Here’s What To Know"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.fo...-trial-begins-tuesday-heres-what-to-know/amp/
"Judge rejects delay in Donald Trump rape trial"
https://chicago.suntimes.com/2023/4...onald-trump-rape-trial-but-grants-concessions
"New York trial could confer new title on Donald Trump: rapist"
https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/apr/23/donald-trump-e-jean-carroll-trial-rape
Rape lawsuit trial puts spotlight back on Trump and women"
https://apnews.com/article/trump-ca...awsuit-trial-d42b3034c049cecd10718746ca87e1e4
"Jury selection to begin in Donald Trump’s civil rape trial"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.th...apr/25/donald-trump-rape-trial-jury-selection
"Donald Trump goes to trial, accused of rape"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/donald-trump-goes-trial-accused-101644437.html
"Judge denies Trump's bid to delay civil rape trial"
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna80014
Call it a banana split its irrelevant. He wont be a convicted rapist.
5 things to know as E. Jean Carroll's civil trial begins against Donald Trump
https://www.npr.org/2023/04/25/1171667259/donald-trump-e-jean-carroll-civil-trial-begins
NPR got headline right
NPR: What is the core of this suit?
Carroll claims Trump raped her in the changing room of the Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan in the 1990s.
"As a result of the pain and suffering caused by Trump's sexual assault, Carroll has not been able to sustain a romantic relationship since the day Trump raped her," Carroll's suit claims
Because it isn't necessary. In a civil trial the jury can draw any conclusion they like from the fact that trump refused to give a DNA sample.LOL
And Trump offered DNA and the Judge rejected it
Judge rejects Trump offer to provide DNA sample in E. Jean Carroll rape defamation case. A New York federal judge rejected a conditional offer by former President Donald Trump to provide a DNA sample in a lawsuit accusing him of raping a writer in a Manhattan store in the 1990s.
The judge noted that Carroll would not be entitled now to get a DNA sample from Trump, because the process of exchanging evidence, known as discovery, is completed.
“Her counsel have had plenty of opportunities in both of the two related cases to move to compel Mr. Trump to submit a DNA sample,” Kaplan wrote. “Had they done so, they almost certainly would have gotten it. But Ms. Carroll’s counsel never moved to compel Mr. Trump to submit a DNA sample. They obviously decided to go to trial without it.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/15/jud...rk federal judge,Manhattan store in the 1990s.
Great! So its a civil trial to see if she is entitled to any compensation for a possible rape that he's never been convicted of.
Your own article says that Trump's attempted rape is the core of the lawsuit.
She, and many, many other women can, and are saying rape. Their testimony is proof.
One other piece of proof is that even trump admits he does this sort of thing. We have emails sent before the trump tape became public that he likes to sexually assault women, and before the emails were made public, we have trump making a tape that he likes to sexually assault women. When multiple unconnected sources say the same thing...
She has a dress with DNA on it and trump gamed the system to keep from turning in his own DNA sample to see if they matched.
The judge instructed the jury to determine whether or not Trump raped Jean Carroll, and to determine damages if they find he did.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...p-during-his-rape-trial&p=5602125#post5602125
Are you telling me Trumps DNA is not available? Wouldn't the government have abn ex-presidents DNA on file?
It's about rape -->
Then why wasn't Trump criminally charged with rape?
Did you sleep through the #MeToo movement? Maybe you should go back and review all the statements from women about Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby and many other powerful men who took advantage of women.
She has a dress with DNA on it and trump gamed the system to keep from turning in his own DNA sample to see if they matched.
Are you forgetting that this is a civil trial for defamation, not a rape trial? She wrote about the rape and trump slandered and libeled her. The DNA was just one piece of evidence to prove that Carroll wasn't a liar when trump defamed her.
Getting a DNA sample from Clinton was a major legal undertaking, involving Starr lying about what it is for. trump has tried hard to guard his DNA.
That is good. We have no idea what is on that dress. How can you trust her when she has no clue when it happened. That makes you wonder if it ever happened