Just a reminder that if you took away just 2.8 million votes in California

Havana Moon said:
I bet your missus detests the Hillbillies.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't say that but she does feel uncomfortable around them. They are not hostile towards her but are usually cordially polite to her and then ignore her but she listens when they talk and being smart she can read between the lines and they make her feel very uncomfortable.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
did you know that if you gave California 150 million more votes and they all voted for Hilliary, Trump would still be president?.......
Click to expand...

did you know that if just 77,000 morons in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin hadn't thrown a childish temper tantrum on election day, we'd have an actual President today rather than the embarrassing joke we've got now?......
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Yes...god forbid a competent woman gets elected.

I’ve never understood the visceral fear and hatred many men have for Hillary that can only be explained by deep seated feelings of inadequacy and insecurity that competent professional women elicit.

I’m no fan of HC but we’d be light years better off than this oaf who is systematically dismembering our civil institutions. Dumbya incompetence almost pails in comparison to the long term damage he’s done to the vital trust in civil institutions that is required for sound government.
Click to expand...

Except she lost because many Bernie Bro's didn't vote for her and black turnout was down. Are those progressive types anti woman or have a deep seated hatred of women?

I'll offer an example on a more local level. We have never had a woman Governor in California. Never. Meg Whitman ran against Jerry Brown. Meg Whitman was CEO of EBay and a very smart woman. She was a Republican but was no right winger or ideologue. (In fact I believe she has since left the Republican Party because of Trump.) Yet Brown beat her. How does this happen in what many believe to be a progressive state? People say we need more women in office then don't want to vote for them.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
I wouldn't say that but she does feel uncomfortable around them. They are not hostile towards her but are usually cordially polite to her and then ignore her but she listens when they talk and being smart she can read between the lines and they make her feel very uncomfortable.
Click to expand...

Someone like her should be ignored.
 
Nomad said:
did you know that if just 77,000 morons in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin hadn't thrown a childish temper tantrum on election day, we'd have an actual President today rather than the embarrassing joke we've got now?......
Click to expand...

We do have a President. He won 304 - 227 regardless of the excuses you make to make yourself feel better about getting your ass kicked.

We got rid of the joke that was elected due to skin color and kept another clown from getting in the office.
 
cawacko said:
Except she lost because many Bernie Bro's didn't vote for her and black turnout was down. Are those progressive types anti woman or have a deep seated hatred of women?

I'll offer an example on a more local level. We have never had a woman Governor in California. Never. Meg Whitman ran against Jerry Brown. Meg Whitman was CEO of EBay and a very smart woman. She was a Republican but was no right winger or ideologue. (In fact I believe she has since left the Republican Party because of Trump.) Yet Brown beat her. How does this happen in what many believe to be a progressive state? People say we need more women in office then don't want to vote for them.
Click to expand...

Yup...and I understand why. Julius Caesar once said that if you give a man the keys to power they will use it to conquer and that if you give a woman the keys to power she will use it to emasculate.

But I'd like to think this isn't 43 BC. I'd also argue that the main reason Clinton lost is that she pimpled off the Great Lakes region as her advisers told her it was to lacking in diversity. I don't think the Bernie bros had any impact on the election what so ever. Hell they couldn't even beat Clinton.
 
Never forget Christchurch said:
Just a reminder that if you took away just 2.8 million votes in California, Hillary Clinton would have still won anyway.
Click to expand...
Hilary Clinton did not win. Donald Trump did. Trump won 304-227 (7 electors were faithless).

Never forget Christchurch said:
Pretty impressive right,
Click to expand...
Not impressive, but rather, irrelevant.

Never forget Christchurch said:
that she could lose that much a margin in the state with the most Americans and still come out in top.
Click to expand...
She didn't "come out on top". Trump won, 304-227.

Never forget Christchurch said:
Also if you subtracted 2.8 million votes from Trump, he would have lost by 6 million instead of 3 million.
Click to expand...
Irrelevant. Presidents in this country are not chosen by popular vote.

Never forget Christchurch said:
Just to be fair, since we're apparently playing this weird game of subtracting Californian votes from politicians, I don't see why it should go just one way.
Click to expand...
Completely irrelevant. We do not elect Presidents by popular vote.
 
Nomad said:
did you know that if just 77,000 morons in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin hadn't thrown a childish temper tantrum on election day, we'd have an actual President today rather than the embarrassing joke we've got now?......
Click to expand...

you're welcome......(though to be honest, you didn't deserve it).......
 
SoMad said:
did you know that if just 77,000 morons in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin hadn't thrown a childish temper tantrum on election day, we'd have an actual President today rather than the embarrassing joke we've got now?......
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
Nomad said:
Did Jesus tell you to elect a constantly lying, criminal pervert scumbag as President?

You fundie idiots are even stupider than we've been giving you credit for all these years.
Click to expand...

Did some monkey tell you to elect another one in 2008 and 2012?

Just a reminder that if you're going to claim you can take someone's guns and challenge them to come where you are, going into hiding after you do proves cowardice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top